Suppr超能文献

选择用于动作的对象对:主动对象总是排在第一位吗?

Selecting object pairs for action: Is the active object always first?

作者信息

Laverick Rosanna, Wulff Melanie, Honisch Juliane J, Chua Wei Ling, Wing Alan M, Rotshtein Pia

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK,

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2269-81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4296-7. Epub 2015 May 1.

Abstract

Perception is linked to action via two routes: a direct route based on affordance information in the environment and an indirect route based on semantic knowledge about objects. The present study explored the factors modulating the recruitment of the two routes, in particular which factors affecting the selection of paired objects. In Experiment 1, we presented real objects among semantically related or unrelated distracters. Participants had to select two objects that can interact. The presence of distracters affected selection times, but not the semantic relations of the objects with the distracters. Furthermore, participants first selected the active object (e.g. teaspoon) with their right hand, followed by the passive object (e.g. mug), often with their left hand. In Experiment 2, we presented pictures of the same objects with no hand grip, congruent or incongruent hand grip. Participants had to decide whether the two objects can interact. Action decisions were faster when the presentation of the active object preceded the presentation of the passive object, and when the grip was congruent. Interestingly, participants were slower when the objects were semantically but not functionally related; this effect increased with congruently gripped objects. Our data showed that action decisions in the presence of strong affordance cues (real objects, pictures of congruently gripped objects) relied on sensory-motor representation, supporting the direct route from perception-to-action that bypasses semantic knowledge. However, in the case of weak affordance cues (pictures), semantic information interfered with action decisions, indicating that semantic knowledge impacts action decisions. The data support the dual-route account from perception-to-action.

摘要

感知通过两条途径与行动相联系

一条是基于环境中可供性信息的直接途径,另一条是基于关于物体的语义知识的间接途径。本研究探讨了调节这两条途径启用的因素,特别是哪些因素影响配对物体的选择。在实验1中,我们在语义相关或不相关的干扰物中呈现真实物体。参与者必须选择两个可以相互作用的物体。干扰物的存在影响了选择时间,但不影响物体与干扰物的语义关系。此外,参与者首先用右手选择主动物体(如茶匙),然后经常用左手选择被动物体(如杯子)。在实验2中,我们呈现了相同物体的图片,有无手握、一致或不一致的手握。参与者必须决定这两个物体是否可以相互作用。当主动物体的呈现先于被动物体的呈现时,以及当握法一致时,行动决策会更快。有趣的是,当物体在语义上但功能上不相关时,参与者的反应较慢;这种效应在握法一致的物体上会增强。我们的数据表明,在存在强烈可供性线索(真实物体、握法一致的物体图片)的情况下,行动决策依赖于感觉运动表征,支持了从感知到行动的直接途径,该途径绕过了语义知识。然而,在可供性线索较弱(图片)的情况下,语义信息会干扰行动决策,表明语义知识会影响行动决策。这些数据支持了从感知到行动的双途径解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验