Suppr超能文献

髌骨骨折内固定取出后的功能结局:我们真的在帮助患者吗?

Functional outcomes after removal of hardware in patellar fracture: are we helping our patients?

作者信息

Greenberg Arieh, Kadar Assaf, Drexler Michael, Sharfman Zachary T, Chechik Ofir, Steinberg Ely L, Snir Nimrod

机构信息

Joint Arthroplasty and Sports Medicine Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weitzman Street, 6423906, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Mar;138(3):325-330. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2852-2. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Functional outcomes after Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) of the patella are variable. Common complications of patella ORIF include persistent anterior knee pain, limited range of motion and symptomatic hardware. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if removal of hardware is beneficial to symptomatic patients after patellar fracture fixation.

METHODS

Patients who presented to our institution between December 2006 and November 2014 with patella fractures treated with ORIF were eligible for inclusion. Patella ORIF was performed using (1) K-wires (KW) with a tension band construct or (2) Cannulated Screws (CS) with a tension band construct. Radiological analyses included (1) AO classification and (2) measurements of prominent hardware length. Patient medical charts were reviewed for demographic and intraoperative data as well as peri/postoperative complications. All patients completed the SF-12 score, visual analog scale, Kujala score, Lysholm score and questionaries' regarding return to previous activity levels.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. The average time from fracture fixation to removal of hardware was 15.8 (SD ± 14.9) months. The mean follow-up was 43.1 (SD ± 27.1) months. Patella fixation was accomplished using tension band constructs with KW in 28 patients (59.5%) or with CS in 19 patients (40.5%). Patient reported quality of life and pain outcomes improved significantly after removal of hardware (p = 0.001, and p = 0.002 respectively). Functional outcome scores (Kujala and Lysholm) did not improve significantly after hardware removal in the KW or CS groups. Significantly more patients in the KW group returned to pre-injury activity (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Hardware removal after patella ORIF significantly improves patient reported pain and quality of life outcomes but not functional outcomes. Patients should be counseled regarding the expected outcome of hardware removal following patella ORIF and diabetic patients should be given special consideration before undergoing this procedure.

摘要

目的

髌骨切开复位内固定术(ORIF)后的功能结果存在差异。髌骨ORIF的常见并发症包括持续的前膝疼痛、活动范围受限和有症状的内固定物。本研究的目的是评估取出内固定物对髌骨骨折固定术后有症状的患者是否有益。

方法

2006年12月至2014年11月期间到我院就诊并接受ORIF治疗髌骨骨折的患者符合纳入标准。髌骨ORIF采用(1)克氏针(KW)张力带结构或(2)空心螺钉(CS)张力带结构进行。放射学分析包括(1)AO分类和(2)突出内固定物长度的测量。查阅患者病历以获取人口统计学和术中数据以及围手术期/术后并发症。所有患者均完成了SF-12评分、视觉模拟量表、库贾拉评分、利绍尔评分以及关于恢复到先前活动水平的问卷。

结果

47例患者符合纳入标准。从骨折固定到取出内固定物的平均时间为15.8(标准差±14.9)个月。平均随访时间为43.1(标准差±27.1)个月。28例患者(59.5%)采用KW张力带结构进行髌骨固定,19例患者(40.5%)采用CS张力带结构。患者报告取出内固定物后生活质量和疼痛结果有显著改善(分别为p = 0.001和p = 0.002)。KW或CS组取出内固定物后功能结果评分(库贾拉和利绍尔)没有显著改善。KW组中显著更多的患者恢复到受伤前的活动水平(p = 0.005)。

结论

髌骨ORIF后取出内固定物可显著改善患者报告的疼痛和生活质量结果,但不能改善功能结果。应向患者咨询髌骨ORIF后取出内固定物的预期结果,糖尿病患者在接受此手术前应给予特别考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验