a School of Physiotherapy , Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
b Department of Rehabilitation , Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Apr;41(7):833-839. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1407969. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
To assess the factor structure, related constructs and internal consistency of the Child Activity Limitation Interview 21-Child version for use in Dutch-language countries.
Cross-sectional validation study: After forward and back translation of the Dutch version of the Child Activity Limitation Interview 21-Child adolescents (11-21 years old) with chronic musculoskeletal pain completed an assessment. The assessment contained the Dutch Child Activity Limitation Interview, and questionnaires about demographics, pain intensity, functional disability, anxiety and depression. Internal consistency and construct validity were evaluated through exploratory factor analysis (principal axis factoring with oblique rotation) and hypotheses testing using pain intensity, activity limitations, anxiety and depression as comparative constructs.
Seventy-four adolescents completed the assessment. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a two-factor structure, explaining 50% of the variance. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's α = 0.91 total scale, α = 0.90 Factor 1, α = 0.80 Factor 2). All nine hypotheses were confirmed.
The Dutch version can be used to assess pain-related disability in Dutch-speaking adolescents comparable to the study sample. Scores on both subscales provide insight into the severity of the pain-related disability in both daily routine and more physically vigorous activities. Implications for Rehabilitation Chronic pain is a disabling disorder which not only impacts physically but restricts quality of life. This study provides clinicians a questionnaire to measure pain-related disability and quantify the impact of pain on the daily living of adolescents. The advantage of the Dutch version of the Child Activity and Limitations Interview over other measurements is that it can distinguish limitations in daily activities from more physically vigorous activities.
评估儿童活动限制访谈 21-儿童版在荷兰语国家使用的结构因素、相关结构和内部一致性。
横断面验证研究:对患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的荷兰语版儿童活动限制访谈 21-青少年(11-21 岁)进行正向和反向翻译后,完成评估。评估包括荷兰儿童活动限制访谈和关于人口统计学、疼痛强度、功能障碍、焦虑和抑郁的问卷。通过探索性因子分析(主轴因子分析与斜交旋转)和使用疼痛强度、活动受限、焦虑和抑郁作为比较结构的假设检验来评估内部一致性和结构有效性。
74 名青少年完成了评估。探索性因子分析产生了一个两因素结构,解释了 50%的方差。内部一致性良好(总量表 Cronbach's α=0.91,因子 1 的 Cronbach's α=0.90,因子 2 的 Cronbach's α=0.80)。所有九个假设均得到证实。
荷兰语版可用于评估荷兰语青少年与研究样本相似的与疼痛相关的残疾。两个分量表的得分均提供了对日常活动和更剧烈身体活动中疼痛相关残疾严重程度的了解。
慢性疼痛是一种使人丧失能力的疾病,不仅会对身体造成影响,还会限制生活质量。本研究为临床医生提供了一种测量与疼痛相关的残疾的问卷,并量化了疼痛对青少年日常生活的影响。与其他测量方法相比,儿童活动和限制访谈的荷兰语版的优势在于它可以区分日常活动和更剧烈身体活动中的限制。