Reneman Michiel F, Kleen Marco, Trompetter Hester R, Schiphorst Preuper Henrica R, Köke Albère, van Baalen Bianca, Schreurs Karlein M G
aDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen bOCRN Child and Youth Psychiatry, Groningen cFaculty of Behavioural Sciences, University of Twente dRoessingh Research and Development, Enschede eAdelante Rehabilitation Center, Hoensbroek fRijndam Rehabilitation Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Jun;37(2):125-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000044.
Psychometric research on widely used questionnaires aimed at measuring experiential avoidance of chronic pain has led to inconclusive results. To test the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of a recently developed short questionnaire: the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II-pain version (AAQ-II-P). Cross-sectional validation study among 388 adult patients with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain admitted for multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation in four tertiary rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands. Cronbach's α was calculated to analyze internal consistency. Principal component analysis was performed to analyze factor structure. Construct validity was analyzed by examining the association between acceptance of pain and measures of psychological flexibility (two scales and sum), pain catastrophizing (three scales and sum), and mental and physical functioning. Interpretation was based on a-priori defined hypotheses. The compound of the seven items of the AAQ-II-P shows a Cronbach's α of 0.87. The single component explained 56.2% of the total variance. Correlations ranged from r=-0.21 to 0.73. Two of the predefined hypotheses were rejected and seven were not rejected. The AAQ-II-P measures a single component and has good internal consistency, and construct validity is not rejected. Thus, the construct validity of the AAQ-II-P sum scores as indicator of experiential avoidance of pain was supported.
针对旨在测量对慢性疼痛的经验性回避的广泛使用的问卷进行的心理测量学研究,结果尚无定论。为了检验最近开发的一份简短问卷:接纳与行动问卷第二版疼痛版(AAQ-II-P)的结构效度、内部一致性和构想效度。在荷兰四个三级康复中心接受多学科疼痛康复治疗的388名成年慢性非特异性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中进行横断面验证研究。计算克朗巴哈α系数以分析内部一致性。进行主成分分析以分析因子结构。通过检查疼痛接纳与心理灵活性测量指标(两个量表及总分)、疼痛灾难化(三个量表及总分)以及心理和身体功能之间的关联来分析构想效度。解释基于预先定义的假设。AAQ-II-P的七个项目的复合量表显示克朗巴哈α系数为0.87。单一成分解释了总方差的56.2%。相关性范围为r = -0.21至0.73。预先定义的假设中有两个被拒绝,七个未被拒绝。AAQ-II-P测量单一成分且具有良好的内部一致性,构想效度未被拒绝。因此,支持了AAQ-II-P总分作为疼痛经验性回避指标的构想效度。