Department of Psychiatry, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Suite 1450, Miami, FL, USA.
Barrow Neurological Institute, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2018 Feb 1;39(5):374-381. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx661.
Despite patient reports of neurocognitive disorders with lipid-lowering treatments (LLTs), large clinical trials have found no significant association between neurocognitive disorders and LLTs. We assessed incidence of neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from 14 Phase 2 and 3 trials of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor alirocumab.
Patients (most on background maximally tolerated statin) received alirocumab 75/150 mg every 2 weeks (n = 3340; 4029 patient-years of exposure), placebo (n = 1276), or ezetimibe (n = 618). Data were pooled by the control used. Neurocognitive TEAEs were reported by 22 (0.9%) alirocumab-treated patients vs. 9 (0.7%) with placebo in placebo-controlled trials [hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-2.68] and 10 (1.2%) with alirocumab vs. 8 (1.3%) with ezetimibe in ezetimibe-controlled trials (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.32-2.08). Rates of neurocognitive TEAEs were similar in patients receiving alirocumab with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels <25 mg/dL (<0.65 mmol/L; n = 5/839; 0.6%; 0.5/100 patient-years) vs. ≥25 mg/dL (n = 26/2501; 1.0%; 0.8/100 patient-years). One patient (0.1%; ezetimibe-controlled pool) receiving alirocumab had a neurocognitive TEAE leading to discontinuation vs. two (0.2%) patients receiving placebo and three (0.4%) patients receiving ezetimibe. Neurocognitive TEAE incidence was also similar between alirocumab and controls when stratified by age.
Neurocognitive TEAE incidences were low (≤1.2%), with no significant differences between alirocumab vs. controls up to 104 weeks. No association was found between neurocognitive TEAEs and LDL-C <25 mg/dL based on the completed Phase 2 and 3 trials examined, although long-term effects of very low LDL-C levels induced by PCSK9 inhibitors are currently unknown.
尽管有患者报告降脂治疗(LLT)后出现神经认知障碍,但大型临床试验并未发现神经认知障碍与 LLT 之间存在显著关联。我们评估了前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素/ kexin 9(PCSK9)抑制剂阿利西尤单抗的 14 项 2 期和 3 期试验中神经认知治疗出现的不良事件(TEAEs)的发生率。
患者(大多数正在接受最大耐受剂量的他汀类药物治疗)接受阿利西尤单抗 75/150mg,每 2 周一次(n=3340;4029 患者年暴露)、安慰剂(n=1276)或依折麦布(n=618)治疗。按所用对照药物汇总数据。在安慰剂对照试验中,22 例(0.9%)阿利西尤单抗治疗患者和 9 例(0.7%)安慰剂治疗患者报告有神经认知 TEAEs[风险比(HR)1.24,95%置信区间(CI)0.57-2.68];在依折麦布对照试验中,10 例(1.2%)阿利西尤单抗治疗患者和 8 例(1.3%)依折麦布治疗患者报告有神经认知 TEAEs(HR 0.81,95%CI 0.32-2.08)。在 LDL 胆固醇(LDL-C)水平<25mg/dL(<0.65mmol/L;n=5/839;0.6%;0.5/100 患者年)的患者中,阿利西尤单抗组的神经认知 TEAEs 发生率与 LDL-C 水平≥25mg/dL(n=26/2501;1.0%;0.8/100 患者年)的患者相似。在接受阿利西尤单抗治疗的患者中,有 1 例(0.1%;依折麦布对照药物组)因神经认知 TEAEs 导致停药,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者有 2 例(0.2%)和接受依折麦布治疗的患者有 3 例(0.4%)。按年龄分层时,阿利西尤单抗与对照药物之间的神经认知 TEAEs 发生率也相似。
神经认知 TEAEs 的发生率较低(≤1.2%),在 104 周内,阿利西尤单抗与对照组之间无显著差异。根据已完成的 2 期和 3 期试验,未发现神经认知 TEAEs 与 LDL-C<25mg/dL 之间存在关联,但目前尚不清楚 PCSK9 抑制剂引起的 LDL-C 极低水平对长期的影响。