Suppr超能文献

用于房颤导管消融术后完全抗凝患者静脉止血的8字缝合法

Figure-of-eight suture for venous hemostasis in fully anticoagulated patients after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

作者信息

Lakshmanadoss Umashankar, Wong Wai Shun, Kutinsky Ilana, Khalid M Rizwan, Williamson Brian, Haines David E

机构信息

LSUHSC, Shreveport, LA, United States.

Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, United States.

出版信息

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(5):134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Limited data exists for types of venous closure and its associated complications in patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. We evaluated the subcutaneous figure-of-eight closure (FO8) for achieving venous hemostasis after AF catheter ablation compared to manual pressure.

METHODS

284 consecutive patients that underwent AF catheter ablation by two operators were included. All patients received continuous therapeutic warfarin or interrupted novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and heparin (ACT300-400 s) without reversal. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) sheaths were left in place and pulled once ACT < 180 s, with hemostasis being achieved with manual pressure (MP); and 2) a subcutaneous FO8 suture closed the venous access site immediately after the ablation on each groin site and sheaths were removed immediately after the ablation despite full anticoagulation with heparin and warfarin or interrupted NOAC. Sutures were removed after four hours, and the patients laid flat for an additional two hours.

RESULTS

The MP group (n = 105) was similar to the FO8 group (n = 179). Time in bed was 573 ± 80 min for MP group vs. 373 ± 49 min for FO8 group (p < 0.0001). Eleven hematomas were seen in the MP group compared to seven in the FO8 group (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In fully anticoagulated patients undergoing AF catheter ablation, excellent hemostasis was achieved with figure-of-eight sutures, with no major vascular complications, a lower hematoma rate, and a significantly shorter flat-time-in-bed compared to manual pressure.

摘要

引言

关于心房颤动(AF)导管消融术后患者静脉闭合类型及其相关并发症的数据有限。我们评估了与手动压迫相比,皮下8字缝合法(FO8)在AF导管消融术后实现静脉止血的效果。

方法

纳入284例由两名操作者进行AF导管消融的连续患者。所有患者均接受持续治疗性华法林或间断新型口服抗凝药(NOAC)以及肝素(活化凝血时间[ACT] 300 - 400秒)且未进行逆转。患者分为两组:1)保留鞘管,一旦ACT < 180秒即拔出鞘管,通过手动压迫(MP)实现止血;2)在每个腹股沟部位消融后立即用皮下8字缝合法封闭静脉穿刺部位,尽管使用肝素和华法林或间断NOAC进行了充分抗凝,消融后仍立即拔出鞘管。4小时后拆除缝线,患者再平躺2小时。

结果

MP组(n = 105)与FO8组(n = 179)相似。MP组卧床时间为573 ± 80分钟,而FO8组为373 ± 49分钟(p < 0.0001)。MP组出现11例血肿,而FO8组为7例(P = 0.041)。

结论

在接受AF导管消融的充分抗凝患者中,与手动压迫相比,8字缝合法实现了良好的止血效果,无主要血管并发症,血肿发生率较低,且卧床时间显著缩短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6145/5652276/5b406cb7d3d8/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验