Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Andrology. 2018 Jan;6(1):136-141. doi: 10.1111/andr.12446. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
Neglected side effects after radical prostatectomy have been previously reported. In this context, the prevalence of penile morphometric alterations has never been assessed in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy series. We aimed to assess prevalence of and predictors of penile morphometric alterations (i.e. penile shortening or penile morphometric deformation) at long-term follow-up in patients submitted to either robot-assisted (robot-assisted radical prostatectomy) or open radical prostatectomy. Sexually active patients after either robot-assisted radical prostatectomy or open radical prostatectomy prospectively completed a 28-item questionnaire, with sensitive issues regarding sexual function, namely orgasmic functioning, climacturia and changes in morphometric characteristics of the penis. Only patients with a post-operative follow-up ≥ 24 months were included. Patients submitted to either adjuvant or salvage therapies or those who refused to comprehensively complete the questionnaire were excluded from the analyses. A propensity-score matching analysis was implemented to control for baseline differences between groups. Logistic regression models tested potential predictors of penile morphometric alterations at long-term post-operative follow-up. Overall, 67 (50%) and 67 (50%) patients were included after open radical prostatectomy or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, respectively. Self-rated post-operative penile shortening and penile morphometric deformation were reported by 75 (56%) and 29 (22.8%) patients, respectively. Rates of penile shortening and penile morphometric deformation were not different after open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [all p > 0.5]. At univariable analysis, self-reported penile morphometric alterations (either penile shortening or penile morphometric deformation) were significantly associated with baseline international index of erectile function-erectile function scores, body mass index, post-operative erectile function recovery, year of surgery and type of surgery (all p < 0.05). At multivariable analysis, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was independently associated with a lower risk of post-operative penile morphometric alterations (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.16-0.93). Self-perceived penile morphometric alterations were reported in one of two patients after radical prostatectomy at long-term follow-up, with open surgery associated with a potential higher risk of this self-perception.
根治性前列腺切除术后被忽视的副作用以前有报道过。在这种情况下,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术系列中从未评估过阴茎形态学改变的患病率。我们旨在评估接受机器人辅助(机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术)或开放性根治性前列腺切除术的患者在长期随访中阴茎形态学改变(即阴茎缩短或阴茎形态学变形)的患病率和预测因素。接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术或开放性根治性前列腺切除术的有性生活的患者前瞻性地完成了一份 28 项问卷,其中包括与性功能相关的敏感问题,即性高潮功能、射精和阴茎形态特征的变化。仅纳入术后随访时间≥24 个月的患者。排除接受辅助或挽救性治疗或拒绝全面完成问卷的患者。实施倾向评分匹配分析以控制组间基线差异。逻辑回归模型测试了长期术后随访中阴茎形态学改变的潜在预测因素。总体而言,开放性根治性前列腺切除术或机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术分别纳入 67(50%)和 67(50%)例患者。分别有 75 例(56%)和 29 例(22.8%)患者报告术后自我评估的阴茎缩短和阴茎形态学变形。开放性根治性前列腺切除术和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的阴茎缩短和阴茎形态学变形率无差异[均 p>0.5]。单变量分析显示,自我报告的阴茎形态学改变(阴茎缩短或阴茎形态学变形)与基线国际勃起功能指数-勃起功能评分、体重指数、术后勃起功能恢复、手术年份和手术类型显著相关(均 p<0.05)。多变量分析显示,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与术后阴茎形态学改变的风险降低独立相关(OR:0.38;95%CI:0.16-0.93)。在长期随访中,有 1/2 的前列腺根治性切除术患者报告自我感知的阴茎形态学改变,开放性手术与这种自我感知的潜在更高风险相关。