• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于错误校正输出编码的数字图像纹理和颜色特征的自动 VSS 烧伤疤痕评估。

Automated VSS-based Burn Scar Assessment using Combined Texture and Color Features of Digital Images in Error-Correcting Output Coding.

机构信息

Linkoping University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 58283, Linkoping, Sweden.

Linkoping University Hospital, Linkoping Burn Centre, 58185, Linkoping, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 1;7(1):16744. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16914-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-16914-0
PMID:29196632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5711872/
Abstract

Assessment of burn scars is an important study in both medical research and clinical settings because it can help determine response to burn treatment and plan optimal surgical procedures. Scar rating has been performed using both subjective observations and objective measuring devices. However, there is still a lack of consensus with respect to the accuracy, reproducibility, and feasibility of the current methods. Computerized scar assessment appears to have potential for meeting such requirements but has been rarely found in literature. In this paper an image analysis and pattern classification approach for automating burn scar rating based on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was developed. Using the image data of pediatric patients, a rating accuracy of 85% was obtained, while 92% and 98% were achieved for the tolerances of one VSS score and two VSS scores, respectively. The experimental results suggest that the proposed approach is very promising as a tool for clinical burn scar assessment that is reproducible and cost-effective.

摘要

烧伤瘢痕评估在医学研究和临床环境中都是一项重要的研究,因为它可以帮助确定烧伤治疗的反应并规划最佳的手术程序。瘢痕评分既可以通过主观观察,也可以通过客观测量设备进行。然而,目前的方法在准确性、可重复性和可行性方面仍然缺乏共识。计算机化的瘢痕评估似乎有可能满足这些要求,但在文献中很少见。本文提出了一种基于温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)的自动烧伤瘢痕评分的图像分析和模式分类方法。使用儿科患者的图像数据,获得了 85%的评分准确率,而对于 VSS 评分的容差为 1 分和 2 分的情况,分别达到了 92%和 98%的准确率。实验结果表明,该方法作为一种可重复、经济有效的临床烧伤瘢痕评估工具具有很大的应用前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bce/5711872/5fb2a04655c0/41598_2017_16914_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bce/5711872/5fb2a04655c0/41598_2017_16914_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bce/5711872/5fb2a04655c0/41598_2017_16914_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Automated VSS-based Burn Scar Assessment using Combined Texture and Color Features of Digital Images in Error-Correcting Output Coding.基于错误校正输出编码的数字图像纹理和颜色特征的自动 VSS 烧伤疤痕评估。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 1;7(1):16744. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16914-0.
2
Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.使用改良版温哥华瘢痕量表评估小儿烧伤瘢痕时评估者间信度的测定
J Burn Care Res. 2007 May-Jun;28(3):460-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013E318053D3BB.
3
Changes in subjective vs objective burn scar assessment over time: does the patient agree with what we think?随着时间推移主观与客观烧伤瘢痕评估的变化:患者是否认同我们的判断?
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003 Jul-Aug;24(4):239-44; discussion 238. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000075842.55039.03.
4
What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers.温哥华瘢痕量表的多少分算作增生性瘢痕?北美烧伤护理提供者调查的结果。
Burns. 2015 Nov;41(7):1442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
How to evaluate scar colour after burn injuries - A clinical comparison of the Mexameter® and the subjective scar assessment (POSAS/VSS).如何评估烧伤后疤痕的颜色——Mexameter®与主观疤痕评估(POSAS/VSS)的临床比较。
Burns. 2024 Apr;50(3):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
6
Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.定量评估烧伤瘢痕特性的可重复性和可靠性的直接比较。
Burns. 2021 Mar;47(2):466-478. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
7
Health professionals' and consumers' opinion: what is considered important when rating burn scars from photographs?健康专业人士和消费者的看法:根据照片对烧伤疤痕进行评级时,哪些因素被认为是重要的?
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):275-85. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31820aaf09.
8
Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume.肥厚性瘢痕消退的评估:温哥华瘢痕量表与瘢痕体积的比较
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000 May-Jun;21(3):205-12. doi: 10.1067/mbc.2000.104750.
9
A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.烧伤瘢痕评分量表用于临床和研究的质量的系统评价。
Burns. 2012 Feb;38(1):6-18. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
10
Implementation of a burn scar assessment system by ultrasound techniques.
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:2328-31. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260018.

引用本文的文献

1
The clinical application effects of artificial dermis scaffold and autologous split-thickness skin composite grafts combined with vacuum-assisted closure in refractory wounds.人工真皮支架联合自体刃厚皮复合移植与负压封闭引流技术在难愈性创面中的临床应用效果。
Int Wound J. 2023 Aug;20(6):2113-2120. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14086. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Efficacy and Safety of 0.25% Timolol Gel in Healing Split-Thickness Skin Graft Site.0.25%噻吗洛尔凝胶用于愈合中厚皮片供皮区的疗效与安全性。
Iran J Pharm Res. 2021 Summer;20(3):178-186. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.114565.14915.
3
Optimization of psoriasis assessment system based on patch images.

本文引用的文献

1
Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表评估面部皮肤移植瘢痕的价值。
Ann Dermatol. 2016 Oct;28(5):615-623. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.5.615. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
2
Smart phones make smart referrals: The use of mobile phone technology in burn care - A retrospective case series.智能手机实现智能转诊:烧伤护理中移动电话技术的应用——一项回顾性病例系列研究
Burns. 2017 Feb;43(1):190-194. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
3
A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.
基于斑块图像的银屑病评估系统优化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 13;11(1):18130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97211-9.
客观烧伤瘢痕测量的系统评价。
Burns Trauma. 2016 Apr 27;4:14. doi: 10.1186/s41038-016-0036-x. eCollection 2016.
4
Can spectral-spatial image segmentation be used to discriminate experimental burn wounds?光谱-空间图像分割能否用于鉴别实验性烧伤创面?
J Biomed Opt. 2016 Oct 1;21(10):101413. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.10.101413.
5
The Semi-Variogram and Spectral Distortion Measures for Image Texture Retrieval.用于图像纹理检索的半变异函数和光谱失真度量。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2016 Apr;25(4):1556-65. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2016.2526902. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
6
Burn wound healing and treatment: review and advancements.烧伤创面愈合与治疗:综述与进展
Crit Care. 2015 Jun 12;19:243. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0961-2.
7
A review of scar assessment scales.瘢痕评估量表综述。
Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2015 Mar;34(1):28-36. doi: 10.12788/j.sder.2015.0125.
8
Outcomes of ablative fractional laser scar treatment.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015 Apr;49(2):88-94. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2014.919927. Epub 2014 May 21.
9
Quantifying fibrosis in head and neck cancer treatment: An overview.头颈部癌症治疗中纤维化的量化:概述
Head Neck. 2015 Aug;37(8):1225-31. doi: 10.1002/hed.23722. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
10
Digital imaging analysis to assess scar phenotype.用于评估瘢痕表型的数字成像分析
Wound Repair Regen. 2014 Mar-Apr;22(2):228-38. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12141.