• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证了台湾版 ID 疼痛问卷(ID Pain-T)。

Development and validation of a Taiwan version of the ID Pain questionnaire (ID Pain-T).

机构信息

Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2018 Jan;81(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcma.2017.06.019
PMID:29198549
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain (NeP) is distinct from nociceptive pain and has different underlying mechanisms requiring specific treatment strategies. To aid diagnosis, self-administered screening questionnaires (such as ID Pain) have been developed to help physicians identify patients with NeP. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a translated ID Pain questionnaire for Taiwanese subjects (ID Pain-T).

METHODS

ID Pain, a 6-item self-administered questionnaire, score ranged from -1 to 5, was translated from English into Mandarin Chinese using local terms and back-translated by an expert panel. A prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study was performed in four medical centers in Taiwan. Patients aged over 18 years with pain other than headache for more than 30 days in either neurology or pain clinic were prospectively recruited. They completed the ID Pain-T questionnaire themselves. The study investigators, blinded to the subjects' ID Pain-T scores, examined subjects using a standardized clinical and neurological diagnostic procedure. The ID Pain-T questionnaire scores were verified and validated.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients completed the study. Clinical diagnosis of NeP was given for 189 (60%) patients, mixed pain diagnosed in 7 (2%) patients, and nociceptive pain in 121 (38%) patients. The reliability and consistency of the ID Pain-T were acceptable, with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.6. Statistical analysis of the ID Pain-T questionnaire calculated an optimal cut-off score of ≥2 for determining NeP with 77% sensitivity and 74% specificity for predicting NeP. Ordinary least squares regression analysis showed significant predictive accuracy of the ID Pain-T questionnaire for NeP (P < 0.0001). These results are comparable to other studies that have translated the ID Pain questionnaire into other languages.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that the ID Pain-T questionnaire is a valid and reliable self-administered screening tool to identify NeP in Taiwanese patients.

摘要

背景

神经病理性疼痛(NeP)与伤害性疼痛不同,其发病机制也不同,需要采用特定的治疗策略。为了帮助诊断,已经开发了一些自我管理的筛查问卷(如 ID Pain),以帮助医生识别患有 NeP 的患者。本研究旨在开发和验证一种适用于台湾患者的翻译版 ID Pain 问卷(ID Pain-T)。

方法

ID Pain 是一种 6 项自我管理的问卷,评分范围为-1 至 5 分,采用当地术语从英文翻译成中文,并由专家小组进行回译。在台湾的四家医疗中心进行了一项前瞻性、非随机、多中心研究。在神经科或疼痛诊所就诊、疼痛持续超过 30 天且疼痛非头痛的 18 岁以上患者被前瞻性招募。他们自行完成 ID Pain-T 问卷。研究调查员在不了解患者 ID Pain-T 评分的情况下,使用标准化的临床和神经学诊断程序对患者进行检查。验证和验证了 ID Pain-T 问卷的评分。

结果

共有 317 名患者完成了这项研究。189 名(60%)患者的临床诊断为 NeP,7 名(2%)患者的混合性疼痛诊断为 NeP,121 名(38%)患者的伤害性疼痛诊断为 NeP。ID Pain-T 的可靠性和一致性可接受,Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.6。对 ID Pain-T 问卷的统计分析计算出一个最佳临界值≥2,用于确定 NeP,其对 NeP 的敏感性为 77%,特异性为 74%。最小二乘回归分析显示,ID Pain-T 问卷对 NeP 具有显著的预测准确性(P<0.0001)。这些结果与其他已将 ID Pain 问卷翻译成其他语言的研究相当。

结论

本研究表明,ID Pain-T 问卷是一种有效的、可靠的自我管理筛查工具,可用于识别台湾患者的 NeP。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a Taiwan version of the ID Pain questionnaire (ID Pain-T).开发并验证了台湾版 ID 疼痛问卷(ID Pain-T)。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2018 Jan;81(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
2
Development and validation of a Taiwan version of the DN4-T questionnaire.发展并验证台湾版 DN4-T 问卷。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Aug;82(8):623-627. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000129.
3
Validity and reliability of Arabic version of the ID Pain screening questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain.阿拉伯语版 ID 疼痛筛查问卷用于评估神经性疼痛的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0192307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192307. eCollection 2018.
4
Linguistic adaptation, validation and comparison of 3 routinely used neuropathic pain questionnaires.3 种常用神经性疼痛问卷的语言适应性、验证和比较。
Pain Physician. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):179-86.
5
Validation of a New Arabic Version of the Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4).新版阿拉伯语版神经性疼痛诊断问卷(DN4)的验证
Pain Pract. 2017 Jan;17(1):78-87. doi: 10.1111/papr.12419. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
6
Neuropathic Pain Assessment with the PainDETECT Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation to Hindi.使用疼痛检测问卷评估神经性疼痛:跨文化适应及印地语的心理测量学评价
Pain Pract. 2017 Nov;17(8):1042-1049. doi: 10.1111/papr.12562. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
7
Testing the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the painDETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain.测试疼痛 DETECT 问卷阿拉伯文版本在评估神经性疼痛中的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0194358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194358. eCollection 2018.
8
Validation study of the Chinese Identification Pain Questionnaire for neuropathic pain.中文识别疼痛问卷用于神经病理性疼痛的验证研究。
Hong Kong Med J. 2011 Aug;17(4):297-300.
9
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Identification Pain Questionnaire in the Assessment of Neuropathic Pain.土耳其语版识别疼痛问卷在神经性疼痛评估中的效度和信度
Arch Rheumatol. 2018 Nov 30;34(3):262-267. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2019.7117. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
[The Self -Complete of Leeds Assessment Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs: an attempt to adapt it for Polish population].[利兹神经病理性症状和体征自我评估量表:针对波兰人群的改编尝试]
Pomeranian J Life Sci. 2016;62(2):18-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Shedding light on neuropathic pain: Current and emerging tools for diagnosis, screening, and quantification.揭示神经性疼痛:当前及新兴的诊断、筛查和量化工具
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Feb 9;12:20503121231218985. doi: 10.1177/20503121231218985. eCollection 2024.
2
Possible Neuropathic Pain in Clinical Practice-Review on Selected Diagnostic Tools and Its Further Challenges.临床实践中可能存在的神经性疼痛——关于选定诊断工具及其进一步挑战的综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;13(1):108. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010108.
3
Scores of peripheral neuropathic pain predicting long-term mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study.
数十项周围神经性疼痛预测 2 型糖尿病患者长期死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 16;13:969149. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.969149. eCollection 2022.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the ID-Pain Questionnaire.ID疼痛问卷波斯语版本的心理测量学特性。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Feb;10(2):213-218. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.53348.2647.
5
Efficacy of Perioperative Intercostal Analgesia via a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Chronic Post-Thoracotomy Pain During Postoperative Follow-Up: A Big-Data, Intelligence Platform-Based Analysis.基于大数据智能平台分析围手术期多模式镇痛方案肋间镇痛对开胸术后慢性疼痛的疗效:术后随访研究
J Pain Res. 2021 Jul 5;14:2021-2028. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S303610. eCollection 2021.
6
Thoracic Paravertebral Blockade Reduces Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.胸段椎旁阻滞可减轻乳腺癌患者术后慢性疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Med. 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3539-3547. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa270.
7
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Identification Pain Questionnaire in the Assessment of Neuropathic Pain.土耳其语版识别疼痛问卷在神经性疼痛评估中的效度和信度
Arch Rheumatol. 2018 Nov 30;34(3):262-267. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2019.7117. eCollection 2019 Sep.