• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ID疼痛问卷波斯语版本的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the ID-Pain Questionnaire.

作者信息

Khodabandeh Behzad, Shafiee Erfan, Farzad Maryam, Smaeel Beygi Amirreza

机构信息

Occupational Therapy Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

School of Physical Therapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Feb;10(2):213-218. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.53348.2647.

DOI:10.22038/ABJS.2021.53348.2647
PMID:35655734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9117901/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Identification Pain questionnaire (IDPQ) is one of the recommended tools by the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain for neuropathic pain screening. This study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Persian version of the IDPQ.

METHODS

First, the IDPQ was translated based on the recommended guidelines. Afterward, the internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), construct validity (compared to the Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4] questionnaire), and discriminant validity (Receiver operating curve analysis) of the IDPQ-P were evaluated. A total of 90 patients with neuropathic (n=50) and nociceptive pain (n=40) were enrolled in the study. In the next 72 h after the initial assessment, 30 patients (15 with neuropathic and 15 with nociceptive pain) completed the IDPQ-P.

RESULTS

No modifications were needed in the process of translation and cultural adaptation. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was obtained at 0.47 for all patients, indicating poor internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficient was estimated at 0.97, showing excellent test-retest reliability. A high correlation was found between the DN4 questionnaire and IDPQ-P (0.74), showing acceptable construct validity. The area under the curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.99) when the physician's diagnosis and the DN4 cut-off value were used as the reference standard, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of ≥ 2 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (98%) and specificity (79%).

CONCLUSION

The IDPQ-P can be used in the clinical setting as an accurate and quick screening tool to diagnose patients with neuropathic pain. Sufficient test-retest reliability, construct validity, discriminant validity, and high diagnostic accuracy were found for the IDPQ-P.

摘要

背景

识别疼痛问卷(IDPQ)是国际疼痛研究协会神经病理性疼痛特别兴趣小组推荐的用于神经病理性疼痛筛查的工具之一。本研究旨在翻译、跨文化适应并验证IDPQ的波斯语版本。

方法

首先,根据推荐指南对IDPQ进行翻译。随后,评估IDPQ-P的内部一致性(Cronbach'sα系数)、重测信度(组内相关系数)、结构效度(与神经病理性疼痛4[DN4]问卷比较)和区分效度(受试者操作特征曲线分析)。共有90例神经病理性疼痛患者(n = 50)和伤害性疼痛患者(n = 40)纳入研究。在初始评估后的接下来72小时内,30例患者(15例神经病理性疼痛患者和15例伤害性疼痛患者)完成了IDPQ-P。

结果

在翻译和文化适应过程中无需修改。所有患者的Cronbach'sα系数为0.47,表明内部一致性较差。组内相关系数估计为0.97,显示出出色的重测信度。发现DN4问卷与IDPQ-P之间存在高度相关性(0.74),表明结构效度可接受。当以医生诊断和DN4临界值作为参考标准时,曲线下面积分别为0.94(95%CI:0.88 - 0.99)和0.92(95%CI:0.85 - 0.99)。≥2的最佳临界值显示出最高的敏感性(98%)和特异性(79%)。

结论

IDPQ-P可在临床环境中用作诊断神经病理性疼痛患者的准确、快速筛查工具。IDPQ-P具有足够的重测信度、结构效度、区分效度和高诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the ID-Pain Questionnaire.ID疼痛问卷波斯语版本的心理测量学特性。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Feb;10(2):213-218. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.53348.2647.
2
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the neuropathic pain questionnaire.波斯语版神经性疼痛问卷的心理测量特性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(20):6065-6069. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1955301. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
3
Development and validation of Arabic version of the douleur neuropathique 4 questionnaire.神经病理性疼痛4问卷阿拉伯语版本的开发与验证
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S31-S39. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_97_17.
4
Validation of a New Arabic Version of the Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4).新版阿拉伯语版神经性疼痛诊断问卷(DN4)的验证
Pain Pract. 2017 Jan;17(1):78-87. doi: 10.1111/papr.12419. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
5
Nepalese version of Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire for detection of neuropathic pain signs and symptoms: Translation and psychometric properties.尼泊尔版的疼痛神经病理性问卷 4(DN4)用于检测神经病理性疼痛的体征和症状:翻译和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 17;18(7):e0287737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287737. eCollection 2023.
6
Hindi version of short form of douleur neuropathique 4 (S-DN4) questionnaire for assessment of neuropathic pain component: a cross-cultural validation study.用于评估神经性疼痛成分的神经病理性疼痛4型简短问卷(S-DN4)的印地语版本:一项跨文化验证研究。
Korean J Pain. 2017 Jul;30(3):197-206. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.3.197. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
7
Validation of Complete Hindi Version of Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire for Assessment of Neuropathic Pain.用于评估神经性疼痛的《神经病理性疼痛4问卷》印地语完整版的验证
Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):257-263. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_340_20. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
8
Validity and reliability of the persian (Farsi) version of the DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions) questionnaire for differential diagnosis of neuropathic from non-neuropathic pains.用于区分神经性疼痛与非神经性疼痛的波斯语版DN4(神经病理性疼痛4个问题)问卷的有效性和可靠性。
Pain Pract. 2014 Jun;14(5):427-36. doi: 10.1111/papr.12088. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
9
Validity and reliability of the Arabic adapted version of the DN4 questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions) for differential diagnosis of pain syndromes with a neuropathic or somatic component.阿拉伯语适应版 DN4 问卷(DN4 问卷,即 4 个问题神经性疼痛问卷)用于鉴别诊断具有神经性或躯体性成分的疼痛综合征的有效性和可靠性。
Pain Pract. 2011 Mar-Apr;11(2):139-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00399.x.
10
Validation of the Korean Version of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Lumbar or Lumbar-Radicular Pain.韩国版DN4诊断问卷在腰椎或腰神经根性疼痛患者神经性疼痛中的效度验证。
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Mar;57(2):449-54. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.449.

引用本文的文献

1
Possible Neuropathic Pain in Clinical Practice-Review on Selected Diagnostic Tools and Its Further Challenges.临床实践中可能存在的神经性疼痛——关于选定诊断工具及其进一步挑战的综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;13(1):108. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010108.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Self-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Disability Following Hand and Upper Extremity Conditions in Persian Population.对波斯人群中评估手部和上肢疾病后残疾情况的自我报告结局指标的系统评价
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Mar;9(2):141-151. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.48859.2423.
2
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Identification Pain Questionnaire in the Assessment of Neuropathic Pain.土耳其语版识别疼痛问卷在神经性疼痛评估中的效度和信度
Arch Rheumatol. 2018 Nov 30;34(3):262-267. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2019.7117. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Neuropathic Pain Prevalence of Older Adults in an Urban Area of Iran: A Population-Based Study.伊朗某城市地区老年人神经性疼痛患病率:一项基于人群的研究。
Pain Res Treat. 2019 Jan 2;2019:9015695. doi: 10.1155/2019/9015695. eCollection 2019.
4
Validity and reliability of Arabic version of the ID Pain screening questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain.阿拉伯语版 ID 疼痛筛查问卷用于评估神经性疼痛的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0192307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192307. eCollection 2018.
5
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
Development and validation of a Taiwan version of the ID Pain questionnaire (ID Pain-T).开发并验证了台湾版 ID 疼痛问卷(ID Pain-T)。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2018 Jan;81(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
Neuropathic pain.神经性疼痛。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Feb 16;3:17002. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.2.
8
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
9
Neuropathic pain screening questionnaires have limited measurement properties. A systematic review.神经病理性疼痛筛查问卷的测量特性有限。系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;68(8):957-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
10
Neuropathic pain: principles of diagnosis and treatment.神经病理性疼痛:诊断与治疗原则。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Apr;90(4):532-45. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.01.018.