Noa Krawczyk (
Caroline E. Picher is a policy analyst at the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, in Washington, DC. At the time this study was developed, she was a master of public health student in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Dec;36(12):2046-2053. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0890.
People in the US criminal justice system experience high rates of opioid use disorder, overdose, and other adverse outcomes. Expanding treatment is a key strategy for addressing the opioid epidemic, but little is known about whether the criminal justice system refers people to the highest standard of treatment: the use of the opioid agonist therapies methadone or buprenorphine. We used 2014 data from the national Treatment Episode Data Set to examine the use of agonist treatment among justice-involved people referred to specialty treatment for opioid use disorder. Only 4.6 percent of justice-referred clients received agonist treatment, compared to 40.9 percent of those referred by other sources. Of all criminal justice sources, courts and diversionary programs were least likely to refer people to agonist treatment. Our findings suggest that an opportunity is being missed to promote effective, evidence-based care for justice-involved people who seek treatment for opioid use disorder.
在美国刑事司法系统中,阿片类药物使用障碍、过量用药和其他不良后果的发生率很高。扩大治疗是应对阿片类药物流行的关键策略,但人们对刑事司法系统是否将人们转介到最高标准的治疗方法(使用阿片类激动剂治疗药物美沙酮或丁丙诺啡)知之甚少。我们使用了 2014 年全国治疗经历数据集的数据,调查了被转介到专门治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的人员中使用激动剂治疗的情况。与其他来源转介的患者相比,只有 4.6%的被司法系统转介的患者接受了激动剂治疗。在所有刑事司法来源中,法院和分流项目最不可能将人们转介到激动剂治疗。我们的研究结果表明,对于寻求阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的涉及司法案件的人群,有机会错失了推广有效、基于证据的治疗方法的机会。