Gorges Julia, Grund Axel
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 16;8:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02011. eCollection 2017.
Multiple-goal pursuit and conflict between personal life-defining goals can be considered part of everyday business in most individuals' lives. Given the potentially detrimental effects of goal conflict-for example, impaired well-being or poor performance-the literature on goal conflict is surprisingly scattered due to heterogeneous methodological approaches and technical terms. Little empirical research has addressed the conceptualization of goal conflict against the background of differing understandings from a structure-like and a process-like perspective. In the present article, we outline theoretical foundations of goal conflict from two perspectives: a structure- and a process-like perspective. Based on a comparative analysis and integration of these two perspectives, we systematically review empirical studies on goal conflict over 30 years of research. In doing so, we identify and discuss important conceptual dimensions of goal conflict, namely, goal conflict as a cognitive construct and an experiential instance, a focus on goal interrelations or on specific goal properties, and resource vs. inherent conflict, and the potential of these distinctions to further research on goal conflict. Finally, we present major challenges and pose questions that need to be addressed by future research.
在大多数人的生活中,追求多个目标以及个人生活定义目标之间的冲突可被视为日常事务的一部分。鉴于目标冲突可能产生的有害影响,例如幸福感受损或表现不佳,由于方法学方法和技术术语的异质性,关于目标冲突的文献令人惊讶地分散。很少有实证研究从类似结构和类似过程的不同理解背景下探讨目标冲突的概念化。在本文中,我们从两个视角概述目标冲突的理论基础:类似结构的视角和类似过程的视角。基于对这两个视角的比较分析和整合,我们系统回顾了30多年来关于目标冲突的实证研究。在此过程中,我们识别并讨论目标冲突的重要概念维度,即作为认知结构和体验实例的目标冲突、对目标相互关系或特定目标属性的关注、资源冲突与内在冲突,以及这些区分对目标冲突进一步研究的潜力。最后,我们提出主要挑战并提出未来研究需要解决的问题。