• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对美国一家公立医院中前来接受不孕不育治疗的资源匮乏、社会文化多元的城市社区进行人口统计学分析。

Demographic analysis of a low resource, socioculturally diverse urban community presenting for infertility care in a United States public hospital.

作者信息

Ho Jacqueline R, Hoffman Jacquelyn R, Aghajanova Lusine, Smith James F, Cardenas Marisela, Herndon Christopher N

机构信息

Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA.

Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA.

出版信息

Contracept Reprod Med. 2017 May 3;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s40834-017-0044-7. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s40834-017-0044-7
PMID:29201422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5683225/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infertility is a prevalent disease of reproductive health that exerts an impact on an estimated 80 million people worldwide. For many, involuntary childlessness becomes a central and preoccupying issue in their lives, the impact of which is exacerbated by lack of access to basic care and treatment. These effects maybe further magnified among immigrant communities, a growing but highly marginalized population that has been shown in other areas of reproductive health to experience worse health outcomes and delays in access to care. To date, few studies have examined the unique medical and sociocultural considerations of infertility among immigrant populations in the United States.

METHODS

Our study is a cross-sectional analysis of women presenting for infertility evaluation at a county hospital serving a low resource, socioculturally diverse largely immigrant communities in comparison to infertile women from a largely affluent population presenting to a high resource, comprehensive fertility center. We employed surveys to evaluate demographics and socioeconomic parameters as well as abstracted data from medical records to obtain infertility diagnoses. Multivariate regression analysis was applied to examine impact of sociocultural factors as predictors of duration of untreated infertility disease burden experienced by patients.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven women were included in our analysis. In the county hospital/low resource clinic (LR), the mean age was 32.9 ± 4.9 vs 36.4 ± 6.3 years in the fee-for-service/high resource clinic (HR). The mean reported duration of infertility in LR and HR patients was 3.4 ± 3.0 vs 2.3 ± 1.5 years. 70% of LR patients were monolingual non-English speakers vs 5.4% of HR patients. 59% of LR patients reported an annual household income of less than $25,000 and 70% did not have a college degree. 81.1% of HR patients reported an income of higher than $100,000, and 81.1% had completed college or graduate school. The most common infertility diagnosis in the LR was anovulation (38%) and tubal factor (28%) compared to diminished ovarian reserve (37.8%) and male factor (51.4%) in the HR. After controlling for age at the initiation of pregnancy attempt, lower education level, lower income, and immigrant status were significantly correlated with a longer duration of infertility.

CONCLUSIONS

Women presenting for infertility care to a low resource county medical center represent immigrant communities and are generally of younger age, but with a longer duration of infertility. This study identifies lower educational level, income, and immigrant status as barriers in access to care.

摘要

背景

不孕症是一种常见的生殖健康疾病,全球约有8000万人受其影响。对许多人来说,非自愿不育成为他们生活中的核心和困扰问题,而缺乏基本护理和治疗则加剧了这种影响。在移民社区中,这些影响可能会进一步放大,移民社区人口不断增加,但高度边缘化,在其他生殖健康领域,他们的健康状况更差,获得护理的时间也更晚。迄今为止,很少有研究探讨美国移民人口不孕症的独特医学和社会文化因素。

方法

我们的研究是一项横断面分析,比较了在一家服务于资源匮乏、社会文化多样的大型移民社区的县医院接受不孕症评估的女性,与在一家资源丰富的综合生育中心就诊的来自富裕人群的不孕女性。我们采用调查问卷评估人口统计学和社会经济参数,并从病历中提取数据以获得不孕症诊断。应用多变量回归分析来检验社会文化因素作为患者未治疗不孕症疾病负担持续时间预测因素的影响。

结果

我们的分析纳入了87名女性。在县医院/资源匮乏诊所(LR),平均年龄为32.9±4.9岁,而在收费服务/资源丰富诊所(HR)为36.4±6.3岁。LR组和HR组患者报告的平均不孕持续时间分别为3.4±3.0年和2.3±1.5年。70%的LR组患者只会说一种语言且非英语,而HR组患者中这一比例为5.4%。59%的LR组患者报告家庭年收入低于25000美元,70%没有大学学历。81.1%的HR组患者报告收入高于100000美元,81.1%完成了大学或研究生学业。LR组最常见的不孕症诊断是无排卵(38%)和输卵管因素(28%),而HR组是卵巢储备功能减退(37.8%)和男性因素(51.4%)。在控制了开始尝试怀孕时的年龄后,较低的教育水平、较低的收入和移民身份与较长的不孕持续时间显著相关。

结论

在资源匮乏的县医疗中心寻求不孕症护理的女性代表移民社区,她们通常年龄较小,但不孕持续时间较长。本研究确定较低的教育水平、收入和移民身份是获得护理的障碍。

相似文献

1
Demographic analysis of a low resource, socioculturally diverse urban community presenting for infertility care in a United States public hospital.对美国一家公立医院中前来接受不孕不育治疗的资源匮乏、社会文化多元的城市社区进行人口统计学分析。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2017 May 3;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s40834-017-0044-7. eCollection 2017.
2
Disparities in fertility knowledge among women from low and high resource settings presenting for fertility care in two United States metropolitan centers.在美国两个大都市中心寻求生育治疗的资源匮乏和资源丰富地区的女性之间,生育知识存在差异。
Fertil Res Pract. 2020 Aug 15;6:15. doi: 10.1186/s40738-020-00084-1. eCollection 2020.
3
Outcomes from a university-based low-cost in vitro fertilization program providing access to care for a low-resource socioculturally diverse urban community.一项基于大学的低成本体外受精项目的成果,该项目为资源匮乏、社会文化多样的城市社区提供了获得医疗服务的机会。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Oct;108(4):642-649.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.035. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
4
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.丹麦的不孕症与辅助生殖。流行病学及心理社会后果。
Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417.
5
A Step Towards Equitable Access: Understanding the Use of Fertility Services by Immigrant Women in Toronto.迈向公平获取的一步:了解多伦多移民女性对生育服务的使用情况。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Mar;41(3):283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
6
Infertility in resource-constrained settings: moving towards amelioration.资源受限环境下的不孕不育:走向改善。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Feb;26(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.009. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
7
Quality of life of immigrant and non-immigrant infertile patients in a publicly funded in vitro fertilisation program: a cross-sectional study.在一项公共资助的体外受精计划中,移民和非移民不孕患者的生活质量:一项横断面研究。
BJOG. 2017 Nov;124(12):1841-1847. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14709. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
8
Estimating infertility prevalence in low-to-middle-income countries: an application of a current duration approach to Demographic and Health Survey data.估算低收入和中等收入国家的不孕症患病率:将当前病程方法应用于人口与健康调查数据。
Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1064-1074. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex025.
9
See one, do one, teach one: Reimagining reproductive endocrinology and infertility training programs to expand access to care.看一例,做一例,教一例:重新构想生殖内分泌与不孕症培训项目以扩大医疗服务可及性。
F S Rep. 2021 Oct 7;3(2 Suppl):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.10.001. eCollection 2022 May.
10
Behavioral risk factor and preventive health care practice survey of immigrants in the emergency department.急诊科移民的行为危险因素及预防性医疗保健实践调查
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Jun;9(6):599-608. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02297.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic and clinical associations with miscarriage and unsuccessful conception attempts among female Syrian refugees in Lebanon.黎巴嫩境内叙利亚女性难民流产及受孕尝试失败的人口统计学和临床关联。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):837. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07990-6.
2
GYNs at the REI gates: unsolvable conundrum or unambiguous opportunity?生殖医学前沿的妇科医生:是无法解决的难题还是明确的机遇?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Dec;41(12):3317-3321. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03344-x. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
3
Public opinions regarding infertility treatment insurance coverage among marginalized patient populations.

本文引用的文献

1
The management of anovulatory infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance.多囊卵巢综合征患者排卵障碍性不孕的管理:支持制定全球世卫组织指南的证据分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Nov;22(6):687-708. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw025. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
2
Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion.美国不孕症有效治疗可及性的差异:伦理委员会意见
Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1139. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
3
Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion.
公众对边缘人群不孕治疗保险覆盖范围的看法。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Mar;40(3):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02687-7. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
4
See one, do one, teach one: Reimagining reproductive endocrinology and infertility training programs to expand access to care.看一例,做一例,教一例:重新构想生殖内分泌与不孕症培训项目以扩大医疗服务可及性。
F S Rep. 2021 Oct 7;3(2 Suppl):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.10.001. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Public attitudes in the United States toward insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization and the provision of infertility services to lower income patients.美国公众对体外受精保险覆盖范围以及为低收入患者提供不孕不育服务的态度。
F S Rep. 2021 Sep 20;3(2 Suppl):122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.09.002. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Access to Fertility Care in Geographically Underserved Populations, a Second Look.地理上服务不足人群的生育护理获取,再探。
Reprod Sci. 2022 Jul;29(7):1983-1987. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-00991-2. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
7
Disparities in fertility knowledge among women from low and high resource settings presenting for fertility care in two United States metropolitan centers.在美国两个大都市中心寻求生育治疗的资源匮乏和资源丰富地区的女性之间,生育知识存在差异。
Fertil Res Pract. 2020 Aug 15;6:15. doi: 10.1186/s40738-020-00084-1. eCollection 2020.
8
The Influence of Diet on Fertility and the Implications for Public Health Nutrition in the United States.饮食对生育能力的影响及其对美国公共卫生营养的启示。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jul 31;6:211. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00211. eCollection 2018.
女性不孕的诊断评估:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):e44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
4
The social and cultural consequences of being childless in poor-resource areas.资源匮乏地区无子女的社会和文化后果。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009;1(2):106-21.
5
Infertility care and the introduction of new reproductive technologies in poor resource settings.资源匮乏地区的不孕不育治疗与新生殖技术的引入
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Sep 8;12:87. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-87.
6
Global access to infertility care in developing countries: a case of human rights, equity and social justice.发展中国家的全球不孕不育治疗可及性:人权、公平与社会正义问题
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3(4):257-66.
7
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 585: Health literacy.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.585:健康素养。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):380-383. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443277.06393.32.
8
Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.改良自然周期与控制性卵巢过度刺激 IVF:三种模拟治疗方案的成本效益评估。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Dec;28(12):3236-46. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det386. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
9
Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion.优化自然生育力:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.011.
10
Treatment differences by health insurance among outpatients with coronary artery disease: insights from the national cardiovascular data registry.冠心病门诊患者的医疗保险治疗差异:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 12;61(10):1069-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.058. Epub 2013 Jan 30.