Letterie Gerard
Seattle Reproductive Medicine, Suite 400, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Dec;41(12):3317-3321. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03344-x. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
Contemporary fertility care has matured from a restricted, special interest in women's health care where success sometimes made magazine covers to a well-honed start-to-finish process with ever-improving success rates and an ever-expanding panoply of treatment options. Innovations in both lab and clinic have been exponential and game changing. The specialty now finds itself in the enviable position of an extensive menu of highly successful treatment options but a complicated set of circumstances of access to these options. Emerging technology such as artificial intelligence could facilitate this transition and improve access. But a key corollary to access and leveraging new technology relates to having a credentialed team to deliver care on scale and maintain best practices and outcomes. The current debate focuses on this Rubik's cube of personnel needs in reproductive endocrinology (REI) and weighs how best to expand access and maintain the culture and spirit of REI. A model to include providers other than REI viz, GYNs or APPs is now front and center. The objective of this Opinion is to define the current context for fertility care and within that context evaluate options and consider what a collaborative model that incorporates a spectrum of non-REI providers including GYNs might look like. Such a model may be feasible (or not) to expand access to care on scale while maintaining high standards and best outcomes.
当代生育护理已从对女性医疗保健的一种受限的、特殊兴趣领域(成功案例有时能登上杂志封面)发展成为一个经过精心打磨的、从头到尾的过程,成功率不断提高,治疗选择也日益丰富。实验室和诊所的创新呈指数级增长且具有变革性。如今,该专业领域处于令人羡慕的地位,有一系列非常成功的治疗选择,但在获取这些选择方面存在复杂的情况。人工智能等新兴技术可以促进这一转变并改善获取途径。但获取和利用新技术的一个关键推论是要有一支具备资质的团队来大规模提供护理并保持最佳实践和成果。当前的辩论聚焦于生殖内分泌学(REI)中人员需求的这个魔方,并权衡如何最好地扩大获取途径并保持REI的文化和精神。一种纳入REI以外的提供者(即妇科医生或助理医师)的模式现在成为了焦点。本观点文章的目的是界定生育护理的当前背景,并在此背景下评估各种选择,同时思考一种纳入包括妇科医生在内的一系列非REI提供者的协作模式可能是什么样的。这样一种模式在大规模扩大护理获取途径的同时保持高标准和最佳成果方面可能可行(也可能不可行)。