Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 5th Floor, Room 550 Main Building, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Discipline of Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 4;6(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0634-0.
The indications for and the number of tracheostomy procedures has increased with advances in critical care. Studies are indicating likely continued increase in number of tracheostomies. Despite the important benefits of a tracheostomy, its presence is associated with adverse health complications and lowered patient quality of life. Hence, it must be decannulated as soon as it is no longer indicated in a safe and effective manner. There is, however, no agreed universal standard of care for tracheostomy decannulation (TD) in adults. The aims of our study are to systematically map the literature on the decannulation process, reveal knowledge gaps and inform further research.
The search strategy of this systematic scoping review will involve the following electronic databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Union Catalogue of Theses and Dissertations (UCTD) via SABINET Online and WorldCat Dissertations and Theses via OCLC. Articles will also be searched through the "Cited by" search as well as citations included in the reference lists of included articles. Studies from the databases will be title screened and duplicates removed followed by a parallel two-independent reviewer screening of abstracts followed by full articles of selected studies both guided by eligibility criteria. We will extract data from the included studies and the emerging themes will be analysed. The relationship of the emerging themes to the research question will be critically examined. The quality of the included studies will be determined by Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT). We will use NVIVO version 10 to extract the relevant outcomes and thematic analysis of the studies.
We anticipate to find studies that highlight evidence and preference as well as acceptability of TD methods and procedures. We hope to expose knowledge gaps and inform future research. Findings will be disseminated electronically, in print and through peer presentation, conferences and congresses.
Our systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO: CRD42017072050 .
随着重症监护的进步,气管切开术的适应证和数量有所增加。研究表明,气管切开术的数量可能会继续增加。尽管气管切开术有重要的益处,但它的存在与不良的健康并发症和降低患者的生活质量有关。因此,必须以安全有效的方式尽快将其拔管。然而,目前成人气管切开术拔管(TD)没有通用的标准护理。我们的研究旨在系统地绘制气管切开术拔管过程的文献图谱,揭示知识空白并为进一步研究提供信息。
本系统评价的检索策略将涉及以下电子数据库:PubMed/MEDLINE、Google Scholar、UCTD 通过 SABINET Online 和 WorldCat Dissertations and Theses 通过 OCLC。还将通过“引用”搜索以及包含在纳入文章参考文献中的引文搜索文章。数据库中的研究将经过标题筛选并删除重复项,然后平行进行两名独立审查员对摘要进行筛选,然后根据纳入标准筛选选定研究的全文。我们将从纳入研究中提取数据,并对出现的主题进行分析。将对出现的主题与研究问题的关系进行批判性审查。纳入研究的质量将通过混合方法评估工具(MMAT)确定。我们将使用 NVIVO 版本 10 提取相关结果并对研究进行主题分析。
我们预计会找到强调证据和偏好以及 TD 方法和程序可接受性的研究。我们希望能发现知识空白并为未来的研究提供信息。研究结果将通过电子、印刷和同行介绍、会议和大会进行传播。
我们的系统评价已在 PROSPERO:CRD42017072050 中注册。