Suppr超能文献

早期与晚期气管切开术对机械通气患者生存影响的随机对照试验(TracMan 研究)

Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial.

机构信息

Adult Intensive Care Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, England.

出版信息

JAMA. 2013 May 22;309(20):2121-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5154.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Tracheostomy is a widely used intervention in adult critical care units. There is little evidence to guide clinicians regarding the optimal timing for this procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether early vs late tracheostomy would be associated with lower mortality in adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation in critical care units.

DESIGN AND SETTING

An open multicentered randomized clinical trial conducted between 2004 and 2011 involving 70 adult general and 2 cardiothoracic critical care units in 13 university and 59 nonuniversity hospitals in the United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 1032 eligible patients, 909 adult patients breathing with the aid of mechanical ventilation for less than 4 days and identified by the treating physician as likely to require at least 7 more days of mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to early tracheostomy (within 4 days) or late tracheostomy (after 10 days if still indicated).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality and the analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

Of the 455 patients assigned to early tracheostomy, 91.9% (95% CI, 89.0%-94.1%) received a tracheostomy and of 454 assigned to late tracheostomy, 44.9% (95% CI, 40.4%-49.5%) received a tracheostomy. All-cause mortality 30 days after randomization was 30.8% (95% CI, 26.7%-35.2%) in the early and 31.5% (95% CI, 27.3%-35.9%) in the late group (absolute risk reduction for early vs late, 0.7%; 95% CI, -5.4% to 6.7%). Two-year mortality was 51.0% (95% CI, 46.4%-55.6%) in the early and 53.7% (95% CI, 49.1%-58.3%) in the late group (P = .74). Median critical care unit length of stay in survivors was 13.0 days in the early and 13.1 days in the late group (P = .74). Tracheostomy-related complications were reported for 6.3% (95% CI, 4.6%-8.5%) of patients (5.5% in the early group, 7.8% in the late group).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

For patients breathing with the aid of mechanical ventilation treated in adult critical care units in the United Kingdom, tracheostomy within 4 days of critical care admission was not associated with an improvement in 30-day mortality or other important secondary outcomes. The ability of clinicians to predict which patients required extended ventilatory support was limited.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN28588190.

摘要

重要性

气管切开术是成人重症监护病房中广泛使用的干预措施。几乎没有证据可以指导临床医生确定该手术的最佳时机。

目的

测试早期与晚期气管切开术在需要重症监护机械通气的成年患者中是否与死亡率降低相关。

设计和设置

这是一项于 2004 年至 2011 年期间进行的开放、多中心、随机临床试验,涉及英国 13 家大学和 59 家非大学医院的 70 名普通和 2 名心胸重症监护病房的成年患者。

参与者

在 1032 名符合条件的患者中,909 名成年患者在机械通气的辅助下呼吸时间少于 4 天,并且由主治医生确定至少还需要 7 天以上的机械通气。

干预措施

患者被随机分为 1:1 接受早期气管切开术(入住重症监护病房后 4 天内)或晚期气管切开术(如果仍有指征,入住重症监护病房 10 天后)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局指标是 30 天死亡率,分析采用意向治疗。

结果

455 名被分配到早期气管切开术的患者中,91.9%(95%CI,89.0%-94.1%)接受了气管切开术,而 454 名被分配到晚期气管切开术的患者中,44.9%(95%CI,40.4%-49.5%)接受了气管切开术。随机分组后 30 天的全因死亡率在早期组为 30.8%(95%CI,26.7%-35.2%),晚期组为 31.5%(95%CI,27.3%-35.9%)(早期与晚期的绝对风险降低 0.7%;95%CI,-5.4%至 6.7%)。早期组的 2 年死亡率为 51.0%(95%CI,46.4%-55.6%),晚期组为 53.7%(95%CI,49.1%-58.3%)(P=.74)。幸存者在重症监护病房的中位住院时间为早期组 13.0 天,晚期组 13.1 天(P=.74)。报告了 6.3%(95%CI,4.6%-8.5%)的患者(早期组为 5.5%,晚期组为 7.8%)发生与气管切开术相关的并发症。

结论和相关性

对于在英国成人重症监护病房中接受机械通气治疗的患者,入住重症监护病房后 4 天内进行气管切开术并未改善 30 天死亡率或其他重要次要结局。临床医生预测哪些患者需要延长通气支持的能力有限。

试验注册

国际标准随机对照试验注册平台(ISRCTN)标识符:ISRCTN84152464。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验