Suppr超能文献

跟腱长度测量法的开发与可靠性以及与跟腱断裂患者跟腱静息角的比较

Development and reliability of the Achilles Tendon Length Measure and comparison with the Achilles Tendon Resting Angle on patients with an Achilles tendon rupture.

作者信息

Hansen Maria Swennergren, Barfod Kristoffer Weisskirchner, Kristensen Morten Tange

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research-Copenhagen (PMR-C), Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegård allé 30, Hvidovre 2650, Denmark; Department of Physiotherapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegård allé 30, Hvidovre 2650, Denmark.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre, Kettegård allé 30, Hvidovre 2650, Denmark.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Dec;23(4):275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need for a valid, reliable, and easily applicable clinical measure of the length of the Achilles tendon (AT) after rupture. This study examines the reliability of a new ruler based measurement, the Achilles Tendon Length Measure (ATLM) in comparison with the goniometer-based Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA).

METHODS

Measurements were performed by two independent physiotherapists eight weeks after AT rupture on 28 patients treated non-operatively.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) injured ATLM was 56.5 (2.3)cm, ICC 0.91(CI [0.72-0.97]), SEM 0.7cm (SEM% 1.2), MDC 1.9cm (MDC% 3.4). Corresponding data for the injured ATRA was mean 64.4° (3.9°), ICC 0.84 (CI [0.68-0-92]), SEM 1.5° (SEM% 2.4), MDC 4.3° (MDC% 6.6).

CONCLUSION

Both ATLM and ATRA showed excellent inter-rater reliability with low measurement error. Both measurements seem easy to use in clinical practice and potentially providing an indirect measure of the length of the AT after rupture.

摘要

背景

需要一种有效、可靠且易于应用的测量跟腱断裂后长度的临床方法。本研究将一种基于新直尺的测量方法——跟腱长度测量法(ATLM)与基于量角器的跟腱静息角(ATRA)相比较,检验其可靠性。

方法

在28例非手术治疗的患者跟腱断裂8周后,由两名独立的物理治疗师进行测量。

结果

受伤后的ATLM均值(标准差)为56.5(2.3)cm,组内相关系数(ICC)为0.91(可信区间[0.72 - 0.97]),测量标准误(SEM)为0.7cm(SEM% 1.2),最小可检测变化值(MDC)为1.9cm(MDC% 3.4)。受伤后的ATRA相应数据为均值64.4°(3.9°),ICC为0.84(可信区间[0.68 - 0.92]),SEM为1.5°(SEM% 2.4),MDC为4.3°(MDC% 6.6)。

结论

ATLM和ATRA均显示出良好的评分者间可靠性和低测量误差。两种测量方法在临床实践中似乎都易于使用,并且有可能间接测量跟腱断裂后的长度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验