Krikke E H, Bell N R
Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
CMAJ. 1989 Mar 15;140(6):637-43.
To determine the relation of family physician or specialist care to intrapartum interventions and outcomes, we carried out a historical cohort study of 1456 obstetric patients at low risk admitted between Nov. 15, 1984, and Mar. 15, 1986, to a western Canadian teaching hospital. The patients were classified as being at low risk on admission by means of chart review. Family physicians and specialists were found to have similar rates for most of the interventions measured, although the interventions for which significantly different rates were found suggest a less interventionist style of intrapartum care by family physicians. There were no significant differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes except for a higher proportion of infants weighing less than 2500 g among primigravid women cared for by family physicians compared with those under the care of specialists. Self-selection of physician specialty by patients resulted in differences in the demographic characteristics of the two patient populations. The findings support the continued involvement of family physicians in the provision of obstetric care.
为了确定家庭医生或专科医生护理与分娩期干预措施及结局之间的关系,我们对1984年11月15日至1986年3月15日期间入住加拿大西部一家教学医院的1456名低风险产科患者进行了一项历史性队列研究。通过病历审查,患者在入院时被归类为低风险。发现家庭医生和专科医生在大多数所测量的干预措施方面的发生率相似,尽管发现发生率有显著差异的干预措施表明家庭医生在分娩期护理中采取的干预方式较少。除了由家庭医生护理的初产妇中体重低于2500克的婴儿比例高于专科医生护理的初产妇外,母婴结局没有显著差异。患者对医生专业的自我选择导致了这两组患者人群人口统计学特征的差异。这些发现支持家庭医生继续参与产科护理工作。