Suppr超能文献

在全膝关节置换翻修治疗过程中降低植入物成本的策略。

Strategies for reducing implant costs in the revision total knee arthroplasty episode of care.

作者信息

Elbuluk Ameer M, Old Andrew B, Bosco Joseph A, Schwarzkopf Ran, Iorio Richard

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2017 Apr 15;3(4):286-288. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.03.004. eCollection 2017 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implant price has been identified as a significant contributing factor to high costs associated with revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The goal of this study is to analyze the cost of implants used in rTKAs and to compare this pricing with 2 alternative pricing models.

METHODS

Using our institutional database, we identified 52 patients from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. Average cost of components for each case was calculated and compared to the total hospital cost for that admission. Costs for an all-component revision were then compared to a proposed "direct to hospital" (DTH) standardized pricing model and a fixed price revision option. Potential savings were calculated from these figures.

RESULTS

On average, 28% of the total hospital cost was spent on implants for rTKA. The average cost for revision of all components was $13,640 and ranged from $3000 to $28,000. On average, this represented 32.7% of the total hospital cost. Direct to hospital implant pricing could potentially save approximately $7000 per rTKA, and the fixed pricing model could provide a further $1000 reduction per rTKA-potentially saving $8000 per case on implants alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternative implant pricing models could help lower the total cost of rTKA, which would allow hospitals to achieve significant cost containment.

摘要

背景

植入物价格已被确定为与全膝关节置换翻修术(rTKA)相关的高成本的一个重要促成因素。本研究的目的是分析rTKA中使用的植入物成本,并将该定价与两种替代定价模型进行比较。

方法

利用我们机构的数据库,我们确定了2014年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间的52例患者。计算每个病例的组件平均成本,并与该次住院的总医院成本进行比较。然后将全组件翻修的成本与提议的“直接到医院”(DTH)标准化定价模型和固定价格翻修选项进行比较。从这些数字中计算出潜在的节省金额。

结果

平均而言,rTKA植入物花费了总医院成本的28%。所有组件翻修的平均成本为13,640美元,范围从3000美元到28,000美元。平均而言,这占总医院成本的32.7%。直接到医院的植入物定价可能为每个rTKA节省约7000美元,固定定价模型可为每个rTKA再减少1000美元——仅植入物方面每个病例可能节省8000美元。

结论

替代植入物定价模型有助于降低rTKA的总成本,这将使医院能够实现显著的成本控制。

相似文献

1
Strategies for reducing implant costs in the revision total knee arthroplasty episode of care.
Arthroplast Today. 2017 Apr 15;3(4):286-288. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.03.004. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty-Reducing Hospital Cost Through Fixed Implant Pricing.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S141-S143. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.082. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Reference Pricing Reduces Total Knee Implant Costs.
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Apr;36(4):1220-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
5
A dedicated revision total knee service: a surgeon’s perspective.
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6):675-681. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1504.R1.
6
Trends in Costs and Professional Reimbursements for Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Mar;39(3):612-618.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.062. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
7
Revision total knee arthroplasty results in financial deficits within the Swiss healthcare system.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5293-5298. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07574-x. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
8
Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty.
Int Orthop. 2013 Mar;37(3):415-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1739-7. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of isolated femoral revision in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty instability: A comparative study.
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Aug 20;12(3):e70337. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70337. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Clinical and Economic Case for Patient-Specific Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.
Cureus. 2025 Mar 8;17(3):e80270. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80270. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Episode-of-Care Costs for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasties by Decadal Age Groups.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 May 11;6(2):49. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6020049.
5
Rapid Recovery Is Feasible for Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty at an Academic Medical Center.
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Jan 15;7:109-113. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.11.001. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
A retrospective comparison of costs for the primary and revision total knee arthroplasty in Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Sep;54(5):541-545. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19114.

本文引用的文献

1
Physicians With Defined Clear Care Pathways Have Better Discharge Disposition and Lower Cost.
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):54-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 11.
2
Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 2;97(17):1386-97. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01141.
5
Do "premium" joint implants add value?: analysis of high cost joint implants in a community registry.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):48-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1436-z.
6
Increasing financial burden of revision total knee arthroplasty.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Jul;18(7):945-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1074-8. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
7
Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
8
The increasing financial burden of knee revision surgery in the United States.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May;446:221-6. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214424.67453.9a.
10
Comparison of the hospital cost of primary and revision total hip arthroplasty after cost containment.
Orthopedics. 1999 Feb;22(2):185-9. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19990201-07.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验