Suppr超能文献

土耳其初次和翻修全膝关节置换术费用的回顾性比较。

A retrospective comparison of costs for the primary and revision total knee arthroplasty in Turkey.

作者信息

Güngör Erdal, Başarır Kerem, Binnet Mehmet Serdar

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Ankara University, İbn-i Sina Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Sep;54(5):541-545. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19114.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the cost profiles of patients who underwent a primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to determine the effects of the length of hospital stay, comorbidities, and septic and aseptic revision rates on the treatment costs.

METHODS

A total of 1,487 patients who underwent primary (n=1,328; 1,131 females, 197 males) or revision TKA (n=159; 137 females, 22 males) between 2010 and 2017 at our institution were retrospectively included in the current study. The patients' demographics (age and gender), the length of hospital stay, comorbidities, and septic and aseptic revision rates were collected from our hospital database. The total costs of revision and primary TKAs were calculated based on the prostheses and surgical equipment used, hospital stay, and other administrative costs in both the Turkish lira (TRY) and US dollar (USD) based on the parity of the 2 currencies from 2010 to 2017.

RESULTS

The average cost per patient for primary TKAs was 7,985±2,927 TRY (5,265 USD) in 2010 and 7,070±1,775 TRY (1,852 USD) in 2017. The average cost for revision TKAs was 13,647±4,095 TRY (8,999 USD) in 2010 and 22,806±6,155 TRY (5,973 USD) in 2017. In terms of the total costs, significant differences existed over the years, with a significantly higher difference in 2015 compared with that from 2010 to 2013 (p<0.001); however, no difference was determined among the age groups (p=0.675). The difference between the total costs of the septic (n=34; 17,964±13,028 TRY) and aseptic revisions (n=125; 23,377±12,815 TRY) was significant (p=0.001), with a higher cost for patients with septic TKAs but with no significant difference between the total costs for the patients with and without comorbidities (p=0.254). Additionally, the length of hospital stay was 2 times higher in patients with revision TKAs than in those with primary TKAs (12.3 vs 6.2 days).

CONCLUSION

Revision TKAs cause higher costs than primary TKAs, with a prolonged hospital stay. The septic background seems to be an independent predictive factor for increased costs in revision TKAs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较初次或翻修全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者的成本概况,并确定住院时间、合并症以及感染性和无菌性翻修率对治疗成本的影响。

方法

回顾性纳入2010年至2017年在我院接受初次(n = 1328;女性1131例,男性197例)或翻修TKA(n = 159;女性137例,男性22例)的1487例患者。从我院数据库收集患者的人口统计学信息(年龄和性别)、住院时间、合并症以及感染性和无菌性翻修率。根据所用假体和手术设备、住院时间以及其他行政成本,以土耳其里拉(TRY)和美元(USD)计算翻修和初次TKA的总成本,汇率采用2010年至2017年两种货币的平价汇率。

结果

2010年初次TKA患者的平均成本为7985±2927 TRY(5265 USD),2017年为7070±1775 TRY(1852 USD)。2010年翻修TKA的平均成本为13647±4095 TRY(8999 USD),2017年为22806±6155 TRY(5973 USD)。就总成本而言,多年来存在显著差异,2015年与2010年至2013年相比差异显著(p < 0.001);然而,各年龄组之间未发现差异(p = 0.675)。感染性翻修(n = 34;17964±13028 TRY)和无菌性翻修(n = 125;23377±12815 TRY)的总成本差异显著(p = 0.001),感染性TKA患者的成本更高,但有合并症和无合并症患者的总成本之间无显著差异(p = 0.254)。此外,翻修TKA患者的住院时间是初次TKA患者的2倍(12.3天对6.2天)。

结论

翻修TKA比初次TKA成本更高,且住院时间延长。感染背景似乎是翻修TKA成本增加的一个独立预测因素。

相似文献

1
A retrospective comparison of costs for the primary and revision total knee arthroplasty in Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Sep;54(5):541-545. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19114.
2
Are Bundled Payments a Viable Reimbursement Model for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2714-2721. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4953-6. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
3
Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2131-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4078-8. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
4
Inpatient Hospital Costs, Emergency Department Visits, and Readmissions for Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S367-S373. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.032. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
5
6
Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2663-2668. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.066. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
7
Comorbidities in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: do they influence hospital costs and length of stay?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3943-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3918-x. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
9
Comparative Analysis of Direct Hospital Care Costs between Aseptic and Two-Stage Septic Knee Revision.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169558. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Revision total knee arthroplasty results in financial deficits within the Swiss healthcare system.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5293-5298. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07574-x. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
2
Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2040-2060.
Arthroplast Today. 2023 May 30;21:101152. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101152. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

2
Strategies for reducing implant costs in the revision total knee arthroplasty episode of care.
Arthroplast Today. 2017 Apr 15;3(4):286-288. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.03.004. eCollection 2017 Dec.
3
Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2663-2668. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.066. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
4
Comparative Analysis of Direct Hospital Care Costs between Aseptic and Two-Stage Septic Knee Revision.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169558. eCollection 2017.
5
Calculating the Cost and Risk of Comorbidities in Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):355-361.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.025. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
6
Toward the Turkish National Registry System: A Prevalence Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Turkey.
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):1878-84. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.033. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验