Henrichsen S, Christiansen J
Department of Surgery D, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Mar;32(3):214-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02554531.
In 375 patients who had curative resection for cancer of the rectum below the peritoneal reflection, prognosis was evaluated according to four currently used staging systems, i.e., Dukes' system, the modified TNM system described by the American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging, The Australian Clinicopathological Staging System, and The Astler-Coller Staging System. Dukes' Staging System, which originally was described for use in rectal cancer, gives as good a prognostic separation as any of the other staging systems, some of which include serosal involvement as a staging criteria, which cannot be used for cancer of the extraperitoneal part of the rectum. It is furthermore demonstrated that an important prognostic separation can be obtained by dividing the B group of Dukes' Staging System into tumors that reach the surface of the muscularis propria and those with demonstrable invasion of extrarectal structures, the latter having as bad a prognosis as Dukes' C tumors.
在375例腹膜返折以下直肠癌行根治性切除术的患者中,根据目前使用的四种分期系统对预后进行评估,即Dukes分期系统、美国癌症联合委员会描述的改良TNM系统、澳大利亚临床病理分期系统和Astler-Coller分期系统。Dukes分期系统最初用于直肠癌,其预后区分效果与其他分期系统相当,其中一些分期系统将浆膜受累作为分期标准,而这一标准不适用于直肠腹膜外部分的癌症。此外还表明,将Dukes分期系统的B组分为到达固有肌层表面的肿瘤和可证实侵犯直肠外结构的肿瘤,可以实现重要的预后区分,后者的预后与Dukes C期肿瘤一样差。