Enderlin F, Gloor F
Soz Praventivmed. 1986;31(2):85-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02091591.
Proper classification of colorectal cancer has been critical in determining prognosis. Dukes' staging and its modifications have created considerable confusion. The TNM system has never been widely accepted because of its complexity. The Australian clinico-pathological staging (ACPS) system corresponds closely to Dukes' A, B, C-classification, but it differs from Dukes' in separating a stage D for incurable metastatic disease. Evaluating the compatibility of these 3 different staging systems, a survival analysis is presented of a group of 800 non-selected patients, resected in curative or palliative intention and compiled from the cancer registry of St. Gall-Appenzell. The prognostic importance of accurate staging for colorectal cancer is confirmed. No matter which system is used, in order to give realistic statements it must be based on tumor penetration, lymph node involvement and distant metastasis.
结直肠癌的正确分类对于判断预后至关重要。Dukes分期及其改良版本造成了相当大的混淆。TNM系统因其复杂性从未被广泛接受。澳大利亚临床病理分期(ACPS)系统与Dukes的A、B、C分类密切对应,但在将无法治愈的转移性疾病单独分为D期方面与Dukes分期不同。为评估这三种不同分期系统的兼容性,对一组800例未经选择的患者进行了生存分析,这些患者以治愈或姑息为目的进行了切除,数据来自圣加仑-阿彭策尔癌症登记处。结直肠癌准确分期的预后重要性得到了证实。无论使用哪种系统,为了给出实际的判断,它都必须基于肿瘤浸润深度、淋巴结受累情况和远处转移情况。