Kim Seon-Ha, Jo Min-Woo, Ock Minsu, Lee Sang-Il
Department of Nursing, Dankook University College of Nursing, Cheonan, Korea.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2017 Nov;50(6):361-368. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.16.076.
This study aimed to explore dimensions in addition to the 5 dimensions of the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) that could satisfactorily explain variation in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the general population of South Korea.
Domains related to HRQoL were searched through a review of existing HRQoL instruments. Among the 28 potential dimensions, the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L and 7 additional dimensions (vision, hearing, communication, cognitive function, social relationships, vitality, and sleep) were included. A representative sample of 600 subjects was selected for the survey, which was administered through face-to-face interviews. Subjects were asked to report problems in 12 health dimensions at 5 levels, as well as their self-rated health status using the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and a 5-point Likert scale. Among subjects who reported no problems for any of the parameters in the EQ-5D-5L, we analyzed the frequencies of problems in the additional dimensions. A linear regression model with the EQ-VAS as the dependent variable was performed to identify additional significant dimensions.
Among respondents who reported full health on the EQ-5D-5L (n=365), 32% reported a problem for at least 1 additional dimension, and 14% reported worse than moderate self-rated health. Regression analysis revealed a R2 of 0.228 for the original EQ-5D-5L dimensions, 0.200 for the new dimensions, and 0.263 for the 12 dimensions together. Among the added dimensions, vitality and sleep were significantly associated with EQ-VAS scores.
This study identified significant dimensions for assessing self-rated health among members of the general public, in addition to the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L. These dimensions could be considered for inclusion in a new preference-based instrument or for developing a country-specific HRQoL instrument.
本研究旨在探索除了5级EQ-5D版本(EQ-5D-5L)的5个维度之外的维度,这些维度能够令人满意地解释韩国普通人群中与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)的差异。
通过回顾现有的HRQoL工具来搜索与HRQoL相关的领域。在28个潜在维度中,纳入了EQ-5D-5L的5个维度以及另外7个维度(视力、听力、沟通、认知功能、社会关系、活力和睡眠)。选取600名受试者作为代表性样本进行调查,通过面对面访谈进行。受试者被要求报告12个健康维度在5个水平上的问题,以及使用欧洲五维度健康量表视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)和5点李克特量表对自己健康状况的自评。在EQ-5D-5L中任何参数都未报告有问题的受试者中,我们分析了其他维度中问题的频率。以EQ-VAS为因变量进行线性回归模型,以确定其他重要维度。
在EQ-5D-5L上报告完全健康的受访者(n = 365)中,32%报告至少在1个其他维度上存在问题,14%报告自评健康状况比中度差。回归分析显示,原始EQ-5D-5L维度的R2为0.228,新维度的R2为0.200,12个维度一起的R2为0.263。在新增维度中,活力和睡眠与EQ-VAS评分显著相关。
本研究确定了除EQ-5D-5L的5个维度之外,用于评估普通公众自评健康状况的重要维度。这些维度可考虑纳入新的基于偏好的工具或用于开发特定国家的HRQoL工具。