Bardosh Kevin Louis, Murray Melanie, Khaemba Antony M, Smillie Kirsten, Lester Richard
Department of Anthropology & Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, 2055 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of British Columbia, E600B - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Global Health. 2017 Dec 6;13(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0311-z.
BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) applications have proliferated across the globe with much enthusiasm, although few have reached scale and shown public health impact. In this study, we explored how different contextual factors influenced the implementation, effectiveness and potential for scale-up of WelTel, an easy-to-use and evidence-based mHealth intervention. WelTel uses two-way SMS communication to improve patient adherence to medication and engagement in care, and has been developed and tested in Canada and Kenya. METHODS: We used a comparative qualitative case study design, which drew on 32 key informant interviews, conducted in 2016, with stakeholders involved in six WelTel projects. Our research was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a meta-theoretical framework, and our analysis relied on a modified approach to grounded theory, which allowed us to compare findings across these projects. RESULTS: We found that WelTel had positive influences on the "culture of care" at local clinics and hospitals in Canada and Kenya, many of which stretched beyond the immediate patient-client relationship to influence wider organizational systems. However, these were mediated by clinician norms and practices, the availability of local champion staff, the receptivity and capacity of local management, and the particular characteristics of the technology platform, including the ability for adaptation and co-design. We also found that scale-up was influenced by different forms of data and evidence, which played important roles in legitimization and partnership building. Even with robust research evidence, scale-up was viewed as a precarious and uncertain process, embedded within the wider politics and financing of Canadian and Kenyan health systems. Challenges included juggling different interests, determining appropriate financing pathways, maintaining network growth, and "packaging" the intervention for impact and relevance. CONCLUSIONS: Our comparative case study, of a unique transnational mobile health research network, revealed that moving from mHealth pilots to scale is a difficult, context-specific process that couples social and technological innovation. Fostering new organizational partnerships and ways of learning are paramount, as mHealth platforms straddle the world of research, industry and public health. Partnerships need to avoid the perils of the technological fix, and engage the structural barriers that mediate people's health and access to services.
背景:移动健康(mHealth)应用在全球范围内蓬勃发展,尽管很少有应用达到规模化并展现出对公共卫生的影响。在本研究中,我们探讨了不同的背景因素如何影响WelTel的实施、有效性及扩大规模的潜力。WelTel是一种易于使用且基于证据的移动健康干预措施,它利用双向短信通信来提高患者的用药依从性和参与护理的程度,已在加拿大和肯尼亚进行了开发和测试。 方法:我们采用了比较性定性案例研究设计,该设计基于2016年对参与六个WelTel项目的利益相关者进行的32次关键 informant访谈。我们的研究以实施研究综合框架(CFIR)这一元理论框架为指导,分析依赖于对扎根理论的一种改良方法,这使我们能够比较这些项目的研究结果。 结果:我们发现,WelTel对加拿大和肯尼亚当地诊所和医院的“护理文化”产生了积极影响,其中许多影响超出了直接的医患关系,进而影响更广泛的组织系统。然而,这些影响受到临床医生规范与实践、当地拥护者员工的可用性、当地管理层的接受度和能力,以及技术平台的特定特征(包括适应能力和协同设计能力)的调节。我们还发现,扩大规模受到不同形式的数据和证据的影响,这些数据和证据在合法化及建立伙伴关系方面发挥了重要作用。即便有强有力的研究证据,扩大规模仍被视为一个不稳定且不确定的过程,受制于加拿大和肯尼亚卫生系统更广泛的政治和融资情况。挑战包括协调不同利益、确定合适的融资途径、维持网络增长,以及“包装”干预措施以实现影响力和相关性。 结论:我们对一个独特的跨国移动健康研究网络的比较案例研究表明,从移动健康试点项目转向规模化是一个困难的、因具体情况而异的过程,它将社会创新与技术创新结合在一起。培养新的组织伙伴关系和学习方式至关重要,因为移动健康平台跨越了研究、产业和公共卫生领域。伙伴关系需要避免技术解决方案的风险,并应对那些调节人们健康和服务获取的结构性障碍。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016-2-6
BMC Public Health. 2025-2-14
J Med Internet Res. 2024-2-5
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016-1
Glob Health Action. 2014-10-27