• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人口腔面部肌功能评估方案:效度、心理测量特性以及与口腔健康和年龄的关联

Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation Protocol for older people: validity, psychometric properties, and association with oral health and age.

作者信息

Felício Cláudia Maria de, Lima Maria do Rosário Ferreira, Medeiros Ana Paula Magalhães, Ferreira José Tarcísio Lima

机构信息

Departamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.

Núcleo de Apoio à Pesquisa em Morfofisiologia Craniofacial, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.

出版信息

Codas. 2017 Dec 4;29(6):e20170042. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20172017042.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20172017042
PMID:29211113
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop a comprehensive assessment protocol for identifying, classifying and grading changes in stomatognathic system components and functions of older people, to determine its psychometric properties and verify its association with oral health and age.

METHODS

The content validity of the Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores for Elders protocol (OMES-Elders) was established based on the literature. The protocol contains three domains: appearance/posture, mobility, and functions of the stomatognathic system. Eighty-two healthy elder volunteers (mean age 69±7.24 years) were evaluated using the OMES-Elders. A test-screening for orofacial disorders (reference) was used to analyze the concurrent validity (correlation test), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve: ROC curve) of the OMES-Elders. The association of the OMES-Elders scores with the Oral Health Index (OHX) and age in the sample was tested.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between the OMES-Elders and the reference test (p < 0.001). Reliability coefficients ranged from good (0.89) to excellent (0.99). The OMES-Elders protocol had a sensitivity of 82.9%, specificity of 83.3% and accuracy of 0.83. The scores of the protocol were significantly lower in individuals with worse oral health (OHX ≤ 61%), although individuals with adequate oral health (OHX ≥ 90%) also had myofunctional impairments. The predictors OHX and age explained, respectively, 33% and 30% of the variance in the OMES-Elders total score.

CONCLUSION

As the first specific orofacial myofunctional evaluation of older people, the OMES-Elders protocol proved to be valid, reliable and its total score was associated with oral health and age.

摘要

目的

制定一项全面的评估方案,用于识别、分类和分级老年人口腔颌面部系统组成部分及功能的变化,确定其心理测量特性,并验证其与口腔健康和年龄的关联。

方法

基于文献确定了老年人口腔颌面肌功能评估评分方案(OMES-Elders)的内容效度。该方案包含三个领域:外观/姿势、活动度以及口腔颌面部系统的功能。使用OMES-Elders对82名健康老年志愿者(平均年龄69±7.24岁)进行评估。采用口腔颌面部疾病测试筛查(参考标准)来分析OMES-Elders的同时效度(相关性测试)、敏感性、特异性和准确性(受试者工作特征曲线:ROC曲线)。测试了样本中OMES-Elders评分与口腔健康指数(OHX)和年龄的关联。

结果

OMES-Elders与参考测试之间存在显著相关性(p < 0.001)。可靠性系数范围从良好(0.89)到优秀(0.99)。OMES-Elders方案的敏感性为82.9%,特异性为83.3%,准确性为0.83。口腔健康较差(OHX≤61%)的个体中该方案的得分显著较低,尽管口腔健康良好(OHX≥90%)的个体也存在肌功能损害。预测因素OHX和年龄分别解释了OMES-Elders总分变异的33%和30%。

结论

作为首个针对老年人的特定口腔颌面肌功能评估方案,OMES-Elders方案被证明是有效、可靠的,其总分与口腔健康和年龄相关。

相似文献

1
Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation Protocol for older people: validity, psychometric properties, and association with oral health and age.老年人口腔面部肌功能评估方案:效度、心理测量特性以及与口腔健康和年龄的关联
Codas. 2017 Dec 4;29(6):e20170042. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20172017042.
2
Protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores.带评分的口面部肌功能评估方案
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Mar;72(3):367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.11.012. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Italian Version of the Protocol of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (I-OMES).带评分的口面部肌功能评估协议意大利语版本(I-OMES)的信度和效度
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2018;70(1):8-12. doi: 10.1159/000488027. Epub 2018 May 30.
4
Validity and reliability of a protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation for patients with obstructive sleep apnea.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者口面部肌功能评估方案的有效性和可靠性
Eur J Oral Sci. 2015 Jun;123(3):165-72. doi: 10.1111/eos.12180. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
5
Expanded protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores: Validity and reliability.带评分的口面部肌功能评估扩展方案:效度与信度
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Nov;74(11):1230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.07.021. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
6
Validity of the 'protocol of oro-facial myofunctional evaluation with scores' for young and adult subjects.口腔面肌功能评估方案(评分版)在年轻和成年受试者中的有效性。
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Oct;39(10):744-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02336.x. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
7
Computerized protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores: usability and validity.带评分的口面部肌功能评估计算机化方案:可用性与有效性
Codas. 2014 Jul-Aug;26(4):322-7. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/201420140021.
8
Expanded Protocol of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores for Nursing Infants (6-24 months) (OMES-E Infants).口面肌功能评估扩展方案及评分标准(适用于护理婴儿(6-24 个月))(OMES-E Infants)。
Codas. 2021 May 14;33(2):e20190219. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019219. eCollection 2021.
9
Validation of the MBGR orofacial myofunctional assessment protocol for adults with temporomandibular disorders with disc displacement with reduction.用于患有可复性盘移位的颞下颌关节紊乱症成人的MBGR口面部肌功能评估方案的验证。
Codas. 2020 Apr 17;32(4):e20190132. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019132. eCollection 2020.
10
Correlation between findings of the oral myofunctional clinical assessment, pressure and electromyographic activity of the tongue during swallowing in individuals with different orofacial myofunctional disorders.不同口面肌功能障碍患者口腔肌功能临床评估结果、吞咽时舌压和肌电图活动的相关性。
Codas. 2023 Oct 9;35(6):e20220053. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022053pt. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Masticatory function in elderly compared to young adults.老年人与年轻人咀嚼功能的比较。
Codas. 2021 Oct 25;34(1):e20200364. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020364. eCollection 2021.