• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种简化版脑卒中专用生活质量量表结构效度的比较。

Comparison of construct validity of two short forms of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 6;12(12):e0188478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188478. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0188478
PMID:29211759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5718408/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No studies have compared the 2-factor structures of Wong's and Post's versions of the short-form Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (i.e., 12-item SSQOL) scale. This study compared the construct validity of 2 short-forms of the 12-item-SSQOL (not the 12-domain-SSQOL).

METHODS

Data were obtained from a previous validation study of the original 49-item SSQOL in 263 patients. Construct validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine whether the two-factor structure, including psychosocial and physical domains, was supported in both versions. The CFA tested the data-model fit by indices: chi-square χ2/df ratio, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), nonnormative fit index (NNFI), standard root mean square residual (SRMR), and parsimony normed fit index (PNFI). Item factor loadings (cutoffs: .50) were examined. Model fit was compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and consistent AIC (i.e., CAIC) values.

RESULTS

All model fit indices for Post's version fell within expected ranges: χ2/df ratio = 2.02, RMSEA = 0.05, CFI = 0.97, NNFI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.06, and PNFI = 0.76. In the psychosocial domain, the item factor loadings ranged from 0.46 to 0.63. In the physical domain, all items (except the language and vision items) had acceptable factor loadings (0.68 to 0.88). However, in Wong's version, none of the model indices met the criteria for good fit. In model fit comparisons, Post's version had smaller AIC and CAIC values than did Wong's version.

CONCLUSIONS

All fit indices supported Post's version, but not Wong's version. The construct validity of Post's version with a 2-factor structure was confirmed, and this version of the 12-item SSQOL is recommended.

摘要

背景

目前还没有研究比较 Wong 版和 Post 版简化型 Stroke-Specific Quality of Life(即 12 项 SSQOL 量表)的两因素结构。本研究比较了两种 12 项 SSQOL 简化版(而非 12 项 SSQOL 量表)的结构效度。

方法

数据来自先前对 49 项 SSQOL 原始量表在 263 名患者中的验证研究。结构效度通过验证性因子分析(CFA)进行检验,以确定两种版本是否均支持心理社会和身体两个因素结构。CFA 通过以下指标检验数据模型拟合度:卡方自由度比(χ2/df)、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)、比较拟合指数(CFI)、非规范拟合指数(NNFI)、标准均方根残差(SRMR)和简约规范拟合指数(PNFI)。还检查了项目因子负荷(标准:0.50)。通过比较赤池信息量准则(AIC)和一致 AIC(即 CAIC)值来比较模型拟合度。

结果

Post 版的所有模型拟合指数均在预期范围内:χ2/df 比值=2.02,RMSEA=0.05,CFI=0.97,NNFI=0.97,SRMR=0.06,PNFI=0.76。在心理社会领域,项目因子负荷范围为 0.46 至 0.63。在身体领域,除语言和视觉项目外,所有项目(0.68 至 0.88)的因子负荷均在可接受范围内。然而,在 Wong 版中,没有一个模型指数符合良好拟合的标准。在模型拟合度比较中,Post 版的 AIC 和 CAIC 值均小于 Wong 版。

结论

所有拟合指数均支持 Post 版,而不支持 Wong 版。Post 版具有两因素结构的结构效度得到了确认,推荐使用该版 12 项 SSQOL 量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/572c/5718408/8601800ae688/pone.0188478.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/572c/5718408/8601800ae688/pone.0188478.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/572c/5718408/8601800ae688/pone.0188478.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of construct validity of two short forms of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale.两种简化版脑卒中专用生活质量量表结构效度的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 6;12(12):e0188478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188478. eCollection 2017.
2
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
3
Measuring burden in dementia caregivers: Confirmatory factor analysis for short forms of the Zarit Burden Interview.衡量痴呆症照料者的负担: Zarit负担访谈简表的验证性因素分析
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Jan-Feb;68:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
4
LC-PROM: Validation of a patient reported outcomes measure for liver cirrhosis patients.LC-PROM:一项针对肝硬化患者的患者报告结局指标的验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 May 10;14:75. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0482-y.
5
Validation of the Chinese version of the Quality of Nursing Work Life scale.《护理工作生活质量量表》中文版的效度验证
PLoS One. 2015 May 7;10(5):e0121150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121150. eCollection 2015.
6
Validation of the patient measure of safety (PMOS) questionnaire in Australian public hospitals.验证患者安全量表(PMOS)问卷在澳大利亚公立医院中的适用性。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Feb 6;32(Supplement_1):67-74. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz097.
7
Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS): structural and criterion validity in Brazilian population with patellofemoral pain.前膝痛量表(AKPS):巴西髌股疼痛人群中的结构和标准效度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 8;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07164-z.
8
Multidimensional daily diary of fatigue-fibromyalgia-17 items (MDF-fibro-17): part 2 psychometric evaluation in fibromyalgia patients.疲劳-纤维肌痛多维日常日记-17项量表(MDF-纤维肌痛-17):第2部分:纤维肌痛患者的心理测量学评估
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 18;18(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1545-x.
9
15-item Roland-Morris disability questionnaire for general pain (RMDQ-g): Structural validity and criterion validity on Brazilian patients with chronic pain.15 项罗伦兹-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ-g)用于一般疼痛:对巴西慢性疼痛患者的结构有效性和标准有效性。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Aug;66:102823. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102823. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
10
Validation of the 25-Item Stanford Faculty Development Program Tool on Clinical Teaching Effectiveness.25项斯坦福大学教师发展计划工具在临床教学有效性方面的验证
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):174-81. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011645.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the short 12-item stroke-specific quality of life scale.简短的12项卒中特异性生活质量量表阿拉伯语版本的文化调适与效度验证
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1232602. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1232602. eCollection 2023.
2
Polish Validation of a 14-Item Version of the Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale (RSS-14): Factorial Structure, Psychometric Properties, and Clinical Correlates.波兰文版宗教与精神困扰量表(RSS-14)的 14 项版本的验证:因子结构、心理测量特性和临床相关性。
J Relig Health. 2023 Oct;62(5):3579-3603. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01816-5. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.结构模型评估与修正:一种区间估计方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
2
Construct Validity of the Chinese Version of the Activities of Daily Living Rating Scale III in Patients with Schizophrenia.日常生活评定量表III中文版在精神分裂症患者中的结构效度
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0130702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130702. eCollection 2015.
3
Exploring the factor structure of neurocognitive measures in older individuals.
Psychometric properties of the 12-item Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale among stroke survivors in Hong Kong.
香港脑卒中患者 12 项脑卒中特异性生活质量量表的心理测量特性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 27;13(1):1510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28636-7.
4
Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the stroke-specific quality of life (SSQOL) scale 2.0 into Amharic language.将中风专用生活质量量表(SSQOL)2.0 翻译成阿姆哈拉语,并进行跨文化翻译、改编和验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jan 23;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02092-3.
5
Disabled woman attitude scale: Reliability and validity study.残疾女性态度量表:信效度研究。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Oct 28;8(5):454-463. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.57701. eCollection 2021.
探索老年人神经认知测量的因素结构。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0124229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124229. eCollection 2015.
4
Psychometric comparisons of four disease-specific health-related quality of life measures for stroke survivors.针对中风幸存者的四种特定疾病的健康相关生活质量测量方法的心理测量学比较。
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Aug;29(8):816-29. doi: 10.1177/0269215514555137. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
5
Development of a short form of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale for patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.开发一种用于动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后患者的脑卒中特异性生活质量量表短式量表。
J Neurol Sci. 2013 Dec 15;335(1-2):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.09.033. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
6
Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians.用于统计分析的正态性检验:非统计学家指南。
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Spring;10(2):486-9. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
7
Validation of the Stroke-specific Quality of Life for patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and proposed summary subscores.验证用于颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的卒中特异性生活质量量表及拟议的综合亚量表。
J Neurol Sci. 2012 Sep 15;320(1-2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.06.025. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
8
Sample size and power estimates for a confirmatory factor analytic model in exercise and sport: a Monte Carlo approach.运动与体育领域验证性因子分析模型的样本量和功效估计:蒙特卡罗方法。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011 Sep;82(3):412-23. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599773.
9
Construct validity of the stroke-specific quality of life questionnaire in ischemic stroke patients.缺血性脑卒中患者脑卒中特异性生存质量量表的结构效度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jul;92(7):1113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.008.
10
Development and validation of a short version of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale.开发和验证 Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale 的简短版本。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;82(3):283-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.196394. Epub 2010 Aug 27.