Damasceno Benito Pereira
MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Neurology, Medical School, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas SP, Brazil.
Dement Neuropsychol. 2010 Oct-Dec;4(4):268-276. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642010DN40400004.
Research on cognitive disorders is challenging due to the complexity of functions studied and to the numerous variables involved. First, the concept of cognition as a mediated (semiotic) and systemic activity is reviewed. According to this concept, the result of a local lesion is not an isolated symptom but a syndrome, and the best neuropsychological approach is an analysis based on appropriate tests to disclose double dissociations and thereby provide clues to brain-behavior relationships. This approach takes into account the influence of task-relevant variables (confounders) related to the patient (e.g., age, education), to the lesion (size, etiology), and to the tests and testing conditions (ecological validity, examiner's experience), which need to be controlled and analyzed in multivariate statistical analyses, as illustrated in research on medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Other controversial issues such as single and double dissociations, single-case versus group studies, and the lesion method are also examined.
由于所研究功能的复杂性以及涉及的众多变量,认知障碍的研究具有挑战性。首先,回顾了认知作为一种中介(符号学)和系统性活动的概念。根据这一概念,局部损伤的结果不是孤立的症状,而是一种综合征,最佳的神经心理学方法是基于适当测试的分析,以揭示双重解离,从而为脑-行为关系提供线索。这种方法考虑了与患者(如年龄、教育程度)、损伤(大小、病因)以及测试和测试条件(生态效度、检查者经验)相关的任务相关变量(混杂因素)的影响,正如内侧颞叶癫痫的研究所表明的,这些变量需要在多变量统计分析中进行控制和分析。还探讨了其他有争议的问题,如单一和双重解离问题、单病例研究与群体研究以及损伤方法。