Suppr超能文献

皮质下血管性痴呆和阿尔茨海默病中NEUROPSI成套测试子测试剖面图

NEUROPSI battery subtest profile in subcortical vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Matioli Maria Niures P S, Caramelli Paulo

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, Lusíada University School of Medicine, Santos SP, Brazil.

Post-Graduate Program, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Dement Neuropsychol. 2012 Jul-Sep;6(3):170-174. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642012DN06030010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic value of subtests of the NEUROPSI battery for differentiating subcortical vascular dementia (SVaD) from Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

Thirteen patients with mild SVaD, 15 patients with mild probable AD, and 30 healthy controls, matched for age, education and dementia severity (in the case of patients), were submitted to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and NEUROPSI battery. The performance of AD and SVaD groups on NEUROPSI subtests was compared. The statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests. The results were interpreted at the 5% significance level (p<0.05). Bonferroni's correction was applied to multiple comparisons (α=0.02).

RESULTS

SVaD and AD patients showed no statistical difference in MMSE scores (SVaD=20.8 and AD=21.0; p=1.0) or in NEUROPSI total score (SVaD=65.0 and AD=64.3; p=0.56), suggesting a similar severity of dementia. The AD group performed worse on memory recall (<0.01) and SVaD group was worse in verbal fluency subtests (p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

NEUROPSI's memory and language subtests can be an auxiliary tool for differentiating SVaD from AD.

摘要

目的

探讨NEUROPSI成套测试的各个分测验对鉴别皮质下血管性痴呆(SVaD)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断价值。

方法

13例轻度SVaD患者、15例轻度可能的AD患者以及30名年龄、教育程度和痴呆严重程度(针对患者而言)相匹配的健康对照者接受简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和NEUROPSI成套测试。比较AD组和SVaD组在NEUROPSI分测验中的表现。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、卡方检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行统计分析。结果在5%显著性水平(p<0.05)下进行解读。对多重比较应用Bonferroni校正(α=0.02)。

结果

SVaD患者和AD患者在MMSE评分(SVaD=20.8,AD=21.0;p=1.0)或NEUROPSI总分(SVaD=65.0,AD=64.3;p=0.56)上无统计学差异,提示痴呆严重程度相似。AD组在记忆回忆方面表现较差(p<0.01),而SVaD组在语言流畅性子测验中表现较差(p=0.02)。

结论

NEUROPSI的记忆和语言分测验可作为鉴别SVaD与AD的辅助工具。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Clinical practice. Early Alzheimer's disease.临床实践。早期阿尔茨海默病。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 10;362(23):2194-201. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0910236.
8
[Brazilian version of the Cornell depression scale in dementia].[康奈尔痴呆抑郁量表巴西版]
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007 Sep;65(3B):912-5. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2007000500037.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验