Suppr超能文献

肾脏对比增强超声检查:单机构经验

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidney: a single-institution experience.

作者信息

Oon Sheng F, Foley Robert W, Quinn Deirdre, Quinlan David M, Gibney Robert G

机构信息

Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Urology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Aug;187(3):795-802. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1725-6. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Focal renal masses are typically evaluated by means of triphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scan but use of iodinated contrast or gadolinium is unsuitable for some patients. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an imaging alternative in this scenario but has limited availability in Ireland.

AIM

The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate experience with selective use of CEUS for non-invasive characterization of focal renal masses in a tertiary referral institution in Ireland, with a particular focus on cystic renal lesions and the influence of CEUS on final Bosniak classification and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

All cases of renal CEUS between 2009 and 2017 were identified. Imaging history, patient records, histopathology reports, urology conference notes, clinical follow-up details, details of lesion progression or stability on surveillance, biopsy and/or resection details and pre- and post-CEUS Bosniak scores were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients underwent renal CEUS (7 solid renal lesions, 21 cystic renal lesions and 3 'indeterminate' renal lesions). After CEUS, the CEUS-modified Bosniak score was upgraded in nine patients and downgraded in two patients. All three lesions upgraded from Bosniak III to IV were renal cell carcinomas. One of two lesions downgraded from Bosniak IV to III was resected (cystic nephroma) and the other showed no progression after 19 months of surveillance.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is a valuable alternative to CT in assessing complex cystic or solid renal lesions where iodinated CT contrast or gadolinium is inappropriate. CEUS can also refine the Bosniak category of atypical cystic renal lesions and help facilitate treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

局灶性肾肿块通常通过三相对比增强CT或MRI扫描进行评估,但对于某些患者而言,使用碘化造影剂或钆并不合适。在这种情况下,对比增强超声(CEUS)是一种成像替代方法,但在爱尔兰其可用性有限。

目的

本研究的目的是回顾性评估在爱尔兰一家三级转诊机构中选择性使用CEUS对局灶性肾肿块进行无创性特征分析的经验,特别关注肾囊性病变以及CEUS对最终博斯尼亚克分类和治疗结果的影响。

方法

确定了2009年至2017年间所有肾CEUS病例。记录成像史、患者记录、组织病理学报告、泌尿外科会议记录、临床随访细节、监测时病变进展或稳定性的细节、活检和/或切除细节以及CEUS前后的博斯尼亚克评分。

结果

31例患者接受了肾CEUS检查(7例实性肾病变、21例囊性肾病变和3例“不确定”肾病变)。CEUS检查后,9例患者的CEUS改良博斯尼亚克评分升高,2例患者评分降低。所有从博斯尼亚克III级升至IV级的三个病变均为肾细胞癌。从博斯尼亚克IV级降至III级的两个病变中的一个被切除(囊性肾瘤),另一个在监测19个月后未显示进展。

结论

在评估复杂的囊性或实性肾病变时,若碘化CT造影剂或钆不合适,CEUS是CT的一种有价值的替代方法。CEUS还可以细化非典型囊性肾病变的博斯尼亚克类别,并有助于促进治疗决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验