Suppr超能文献

用于准确预测左侧双腔气管导管最佳插入深度的胸部计算机断层扫描图像

Chest Computed Tomography Image for Accurately Predicting the Optimal Insertion Depth of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Tube.

作者信息

Liu Zhuo, Zhao Li, Jia Qianqian, Yang Xiaochun, Liang Shu Juan, He Wensheng

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.

Department of Emergency, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):855-859. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.09.025. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of measuring the distance between the vocal cord and carina using chest computer tomography (CT) as a guide for the intubation of a left-sided double-lumen tube (LDLT).

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Local hospital in China.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring an LDLT for one lung ventilation were enrolled in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to the following 2 groups: blind intubation group (B group, n = 30) or chest computed tomography-guided group (C group, n = 30). The placement of the LDLT was accomplished using 1 of the 2 intubation methods. After intubation, an independent anesthesiologist evaluated the position of the LDLT and carina and bronchial injuries using fiber optic bronchoscopy. The number of optimal positions, the time for LDLT intubation, the time for fiber optic bronchoscope confirmation, and carina and bronchial injuries were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 30 intubations in the B group were in optimal position, whereas 27 of 30 intubations in the C group were in optimal position; the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The time for intubation of the LDLT took 118.0 ± 26.2 seconds in the B group and 71.5 ± 8.7 seconds in the C group (p < 0.01). The time for position confirmation using fiber optic bronchoscope took 40.8 ± 15.8 seconds in the B group and 18.7 ± 7.9 seconds in the C group (p < 0.05). The incidences of carina and bronchial injuries were obviously lower in the C group (occurred in 3 of 30 cases) than in the B group (11 of 30 cases) p < 0.05. The incidences of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness showed no significant differences between the 2 groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the method of measuring the distance between the vocal cord and carina according to the chest CT as a guide for the intubation of LDLT is more effective and more accurate than the blind intubation method.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估以胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)为引导来测量声带与隆突之间的距离,以此作为左侧双腔气管导管(LDLT)插管的可行性和准确性。

设计

单中心、前瞻性、随机研究。

地点

中国当地医院。

参与者

60例接受择期胸外科手术且需要使用LDLT进行单肺通气的成年患者纳入本研究。

干预措施

患者被随机分为以下2组:盲插组(B组,n = 30)或胸部计算机断层扫描引导组(C组,n = 30)。使用两种插管方法中的一种完成LDLT的放置。插管后,由一名独立的麻醉医生使用纤维支气管镜评估LDLT和隆突的位置以及支气管损伤情况。记录最佳位置的数量、LDLT插管时间、纤维支气管镜确认时间以及隆突和支气管损伤情况。

结果

B组30次插管中有16次处于最佳位置,而C组30次插管中有27次处于最佳位置;差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。B组LDLT插管时间为118.0 ± 26.2秒,C组为71.5 ± 8.7秒(p < 0.01)。B组使用纤维支气管镜确认位置的时间为40.8 ± 15.8秒,C组为18.7 ± 7.9秒(p < 0.05)。C组隆突和支气管损伤的发生率(30例中有3例发生)明显低于B组(30例中有11例发生),p < 0.05。两组术后咽痛和声音嘶哑的发生率无显著差异(p > 0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,以胸部CT为引导测量声带与隆突之间的距离作为LDLT插管的方法比盲插法更有效、更准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验