Axelsson Erland, Lindsäter Elin, Ljótsson Brjánn, Andersson Erik, Hedman-Lagerlöf Erik
Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gustavsberg Primary Care Clinic, Gustavsberg, Sweden.
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Dec 8;4(4):e58. doi: 10.2196/mental.7497.
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a widespread measure of disability and functional impairment, which is bundled with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) for use in psychiatry. Administering psychometric scales via the Internet is an effective way to reach respondents and allow for convenient handling of data.
The aim was to study the psychometric properties of the 12-item self-report WHODAS 2.0 when administered online to individuals with anxiety and stress disorders. The WHODAS 2.0 was hypothesized to exhibit high internal consistency and be unidimensional. We also expected the WHODAS 2.0 to show high 2-week test-retest reliability, convergent validity (correlations approximately .50 to .90 with other self-report measures of functional impairment), that it would differentiate between patients with and without exhaustion disorder, and that it would respond to change in primary symptom domain.
We administered the 12-item self-report WHODAS 2.0 online to patients with anxiety and stress disorders (N=160) enrolled in clinical trials of cognitive behavior therapy, and analyzed psychometric properties within a classical test theory framework. Scores were compared with well-established symptom and disability measures, and sensitivity to change was studied from pretreatment to posttreatment assessment.
The 12-item self-report WHODAS 2.0 showed high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=.83-.92), high 2-week test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=.83), adequate construct validity, and was sensitive to change. We found preliminary evidence for a three-factorial structure, but one strong factor accounted for a clear majority of the variance.
We conclude that the 12-item self-report WHODAS 2.0 is a psychometrically sound instrument when administered online to individuals with anxiety and stress disorders, but that it is probably fruitful to also report the three subfactors to facilitate comparisons between studies.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02540317; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02540317 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6vQEdYAem); Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02314065; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02314065 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6vQEjlUU8).
世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0版(WHODAS 2.0)是一种广泛应用的残疾和功能障碍测量工具,它与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)配套使用于精神病学领域。通过互联网实施心理测量量表是接触受访者并便于数据处理的有效方式。
旨在研究在线施测于焦虑和应激障碍患者时,12项自评WHODAS 2.0的心理测量特性。假设WHODAS 2.0具有高内部一致性且为单维量表。我们还预期WHODAS 2.0能显示出高2周重测信度、收敛效度(与其他功能障碍自评测量的相关性约为0.50至0.90),能够区分患有和未患有衰竭障碍的患者,并且能对主要症状领域的变化做出反应。
我们对参与认知行为疗法临床试验的焦虑和应激障碍患者(N = 160)在线施测12项自评WHODAS 2.0,并在经典测试理论框架内分析心理测量特性。将得分与成熟的症状和残疾测量指标进行比较,并研究从治疗前到治疗后评估的变化敏感性。
12项自评WHODAS 2.0显示出高内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.83 - 0.92)、高2周重测信度(组内相关系数 = 0.83)、足够的结构效度,并且对变化敏感。我们发现了三因素结构的初步证据,但一个强因素占了大部分方差。
我们得出结论,当在线施测于焦虑和应激障碍患者时,12项自评WHODAS 2.0是一种心理测量学上可靠的工具,但报告三个子因素可能有助于促进研究间的比较。
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02540317;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02540317(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6vQEdYAem);Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02314065;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02314065(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6vQEjlUU8)。