• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同类相互作用对群体解决问题中多样性效应的影响。

The Influence of Homophilous Interactions on Diversity Effects in Group Problem-Solving.

作者信息

Estévez-Mujica Claudia P, Acero Andrés, Jiménez-Leal William, Garcia-Diaz César

机构信息

Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia.

出版信息

Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):77-102.

PMID:29223199
Abstract

Increasingly diversity researchers call for further studies of group micro-processes and dynamics to understand the paradoxical effects of diversity on group performance. In this study, based on analyses of in-group, networked, homophilous interactions, we aim to explain further the effects of diversity on group performance in a parallel problem-solving task, both experimentally and computationally. We developed a 'whodunit' problem-solving experiment with 116 participants assigned to different-sized groups. Experimental results show that low diversity and high homophily levels are associated with lower performance while the effects of group size are not significant. To investigate this further, we developed an agent-based computational model (ABM), through which we inspected (a) the effect of different homophily and diversity strengths on performance, and (b) the robustness of such effects across group size variations. Overall, modeling results were consistent with our experimental findings, and revealed that the strength of homophily can drive diversity towards a positive or negative impact on performance. We also observed that increasing group size has a very marginal effect. Our work contributes to a better understanding of the implications of diversity in-group problem-solving by providing an integration of both experimental and computational perspectives in the analysis of group processes.

摘要

越来越多的多样性研究人员呼吁进一步研究群体微观过程和动态,以理解多样性对群体绩效的矛盾影响。在本研究中,基于对群体内、网络化、同质化互动的分析,我们旨在通过实验和计算进一步解释多样性在并行问题解决任务中对群体绩效的影响。我们开展了一项“破案”问题解决实验,将116名参与者分配到不同规模的小组中。实验结果表明,低多样性和高同质化水平与较低的绩效相关,而群体规模的影响并不显著。为了进一步研究这一问题,我们开发了一个基于主体的计算模型(ABM),通过该模型我们考察了(a)不同同质化和多样性强度对绩效的影响,以及(b)这些影响在群体规模变化中的稳健性。总体而言,建模结果与我们的实验结果一致,并揭示了同质化强度可以使多样性对绩效产生积极或消极影响。我们还观察到,增加群体规模的影响非常微小。我们的工作通过在群体过程分析中整合实验和计算视角,有助于更好地理解多样性在群体问题解决中的影响。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Homophilous Interactions on Diversity Effects in Group Problem-Solving.同类相互作用对群体解决问题中多样性效应的影响。
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):77-102.
2
The more the merrier? Increasing group size may be detrimental to decision-making performance in nominal groups.人越多越热闹?在名义群体中,增加群体规模可能不利于决策表现。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 27;13(2):e0192213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192213. eCollection 2018.
3
Innovation, imitation, and problem-solving in a networked group.网络群体中的创新、模仿与问题解决
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2011 Apr;15(2):229-52.
4
The Power of a "Maverick" in Collaborative Problem Solving: An Experimental Investigation of Individual Perspective-Taking Within a Group.“特立独行者”在协作解决问题中的力量:关于群体内个体视角采择的实验研究
Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 1:69-104. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12587. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
The effects of group decision-making process and problem-situation complexity on implementation attempts.群体决策过程和问题情境复杂性对实施尝试的影响。
Adm Sci Q. 1980 Sep;25(3):428-40.
6
What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.差异为何有差异?组织中多元化团队的承诺与现实。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005 Oct;6(2):31-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x. Epub 2005 Oct 1.
7
BAYESIAN DECISION THEORY, GAME THEORY AND GROUP PROBLEM SOLVING. ESD-TDR-64-603.贝叶斯决策理论、博弈论与群体问题解决。ESD - TDR - 64 - 603。
Tech Doc Rep U S Air Force Syst Command Electron Syst Div. 1964 Oct;69:1-12.
8
Social learning strategies in networked groups.网络群体中的社会学习策略。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Nov-Dec;37(8):1383-425. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12052. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
9
Influence of network topology on cooperative problem-solving systems.网络拓扑结构对协同问题解决系统的影响。
Theory Biosci. 2016 Sep;135(3):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s12064-015-0219-1. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
10
The influence of positive affect on clinical problem solving.积极情绪对临床问题解决的影响。
Med Decis Making. 1991 Jul-Sep;11(3):221-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9101100313.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Cohesion, Role Equivalence, or Homophily: Which Process Best Explains Social Homogeneity?结构凝聚、角色等同还是相似相吸:哪个过程能最好地解释社会同质性?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;19(21):14471. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114471.