• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年肾衰竭患者瘘管位置、通畅性和成熟度的基于年龄的比较。

An age-based comparison of fistula location, patency, and maturation for elderly renal failure patients.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Division of Vascular Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2018 May;67(5):1491-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.080. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.080
PMID:29224945
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines do not incorporate age in determining autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis access placement, and the optimal initial configuration in elderly patients remains controversial. We compared patency, maturation, survival, and complications between several age cohorts (<65 years, 65-79 years, >80 years) to determine whether protocols should be modified to account for advanced age.

METHODS

All patients at two teaching hospitals undergoing a first autogenous arteriovenous access creation in either arm between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox hazards models were used to compare access patency and risk factors for failure.

RESULTS

There were 941 autogenous arteriovenous accesses (median follow-up, 23 months; range, 0-89 months) eligible for inclusion; 152 (15.3%) accesses were created in those >80 years, 397 (42.2%) in those 65 to 79 years, and 392 (41.8%) in those <65 years. Primary patencies in patients >80 years, 65 to 79 years, and <65 years were 40% ± 4%, 38% ± 3%, and 51% ± 3% at 12 months and 12% ± 5%, 13% ± 3%, and 27% ± 3% at 36 months (P < .001). Primary assisted patencies were 72% ± 4%, 70% ± 2%, and 78% ± 2% at 12 months and 52% ± 5%, 52% ± 3%, and 67% ± 3% at 36 months (P < .001). Secondary patencies were 72% ± 4%, 71% ± 2%, and 79% ± 2% at 12 months and 54% ± 5%, 55% ± 3%, and 72% ± 3% at 36 months (P < .001). Radiocephalic patencies were lowest among older cohorts; in those >80 years, 65 to 79 years, and <65 years, they were 65% ± 7%, 67% ± 4%, and 77% ± 3% at 12 months and 41% ± 8%, 51% ± 5%, and 68% ± 4% at 36 months (P = .019). Secondary brachiocephalic access patencies in these cohorts were 78% ± 5%, 80% ± 3%, and 82% ± 3% at 12 months and 68% ± 7%, 66% ± 5%, and 77% ± 4% at 36 months (P = .206). Both the age groups 65 to 79 years and >80 years demonstrated superior brachiocephalic vs radiocephalic secondary patencies (P = .048 and P = .015, respectively); however, no differences between configuration and secondary patency were observed within the cohort <65 years. Radiocephalic access maturation failure at 12 and 24 months was 25% ± 3% and 29% ± 4% in those <65 years, 32% ± 3% and 39% ± 4% in those 65 to 79 years, and 40% ± 7% and 48% ± 8% in those >80 years (P = .006). Brachiocephalic access maturation failures were 17% ± 3% and 20% ± 3% at 12 and 24 months in those <65 years, 21% ± 3% and 25% ± 4% in those 65 to 79 years, and 18% ± 5% and 21% ± 5% in those >80 years (P = .740). On multivariate analysis, coronary disease, female sex, previous ipsilateral or bilateral catheters, radiocephalic configuration, and age >65 years were associated with secondary patency loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients aged 65 to 79 years and >80 years had inferior primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency and maturation compared with those <65 years. When stratified by configuration, radiocephalic accesses demonstrated lower patency and maturation compared with brachiocephalic accesses for patients aged 65 to 79 years and >80 years and were an independent predictor of secondary patency loss.

摘要

目的

目前肾脏病预后质量倡议指南在确定自体动静脉血液透析通路的位置时并未考虑年龄因素,而在老年患者中最佳的初始构型仍存在争议。我们比较了几个年龄组(<65 岁、65-79 岁、>80 岁)的通畅率、成熟度、生存率和并发症,以确定是否需要修改方案以考虑高龄因素。

方法

我们从两个教学医院前瞻性维护的数据库中回顾性分析了 2007 年至 2013 年间在任一侧手臂首次进行自体动静脉通路创建的所有患者;使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存和 Cox 风险模型比较了通路通畅率和失败的危险因素。

结果

共纳入 941 例自体动静脉通路(中位随访时间 23 个月;范围 0-89 个月);152 例(15.3%)在>80 岁的患者中建立,397 例(42.2%)在 65-79 岁的患者中建立,392 例(41.8%)在<65 岁的患者中建立。>80 岁、65-79 岁和<65 岁的患者 12 个月时的原发通畅率分别为 40%±4%、38%±3%和 51%±3%,36 个月时分别为 12%±5%、13%±3%和 27%±3%(P<0.001)。原发辅助通畅率在 12 个月时分别为 72%±4%、70%±2%和 78%±2%,36 个月时分别为 52%±5%、52%±3%和 67%±3%(P<0.001)。继发性通畅率在 12 个月时分别为 72%±4%、71%±2%和 79%±2%,36 个月时分别为 54%±5%、55%±3%和 72%±3%(P<0.001)。桡动脉通路在老年患者中的通畅率最低;在>80 岁、65-79 岁和<65 岁的患者中,12 个月时分别为 65%±7%、67%±4%和 77%±3%,36 个月时分别为 41%±8%、51%±5%和 68%±4%(P=0.019)。这些患者的继发性头臂动脉通路通畅率在 12 个月时分别为 78%±5%、80%±3%和 82%±3%,36 个月时分别为 68%±7%、66%±5%和 77%±4%(P=0.206)。65-79 岁和>80 岁的两个年龄组的头臂动脉继发性通畅率均优于桡动脉(P=0.048 和 P=0.015);然而,<65 岁的患者中,在配置和继发性通畅率之间没有差异。12 个月和 24 个月时桡动脉通路成熟失败率在<65 岁患者中分别为 25%±3%和 29%±4%,在 65-79 岁患者中分别为 32%±3%和 39%±4%,在>80 岁患者中分别为 40%±7%和 48%±8%(P=0.006)。12 个月和 24 个月时头臂动脉通路成熟失败率在<65 岁患者中分别为 17%±3%和 20%±3%,在 65-79 岁患者中分别为 21%±3%和 25%±4%,在>80 岁患者中分别为 18%±5%和 21%±5%(P=0.740)。多变量分析显示,冠心病、女性、同侧或双侧导管史、桡动脉构型和年龄>65 岁与继发性通畅率丧失相关。

结论

65-79 岁和>80 岁的患者与<65 岁的患者相比,原发性、原发性辅助性和继发性通畅率和成熟度较低。在按构型分层时,桡动脉通路在 65-79 岁和>80 岁的患者中与头臂动脉通路相比,其通畅率和成熟度较低,是继发性通畅率丧失的独立预测因素。

相似文献

1
An age-based comparison of fistula location, patency, and maturation for elderly renal failure patients.老年肾衰竭患者瘘管位置、通畅性和成熟度的基于年龄的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 May;67(5):1491-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.080. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
2
Influence of artery and vein diameters on autogenous arteriovenous access patency.动脉和静脉直径对自体动静脉通路通畅性的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):158-172.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.075. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
A comparison of outcomes between open and endovascular arteriovenous access creation for hemodialysis.开放性与血管内动静脉通路建立用于血液透析的结局比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):238-247.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.104. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
4
The Significance of Inflow Artery and Tourniquet Derived Cephalic Vein Diameters on Predicting Successful Use and Patency of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Haemodialysis.流入动脉及止血带法获取的头静脉直径对预测血液透析动静脉内瘘成功使用及通畅性的意义
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;53(6):870-878. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
5
Clinical effectiveness of open thrombectomy for thrombosed autogenous arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.自体动静脉瘘和移植物血栓形成的开放式血栓切除术的临床效果。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.050. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
Improved outcomes with proximal radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas compared with brachial-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas.与肱动脉-头静脉动静脉内瘘相比,桡动脉-头静脉近心端动静脉内瘘的治疗效果更佳。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1497-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.075. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
7
Vascular access in hemodialysis patients older than 80 years.80 岁以上血液透析患者的血管通路。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
8
Patient-related factors influencing patency of autogenous brachiocephalic haemodialysis fistulas.影响自体肱头臂动静脉内瘘通畅性的患者相关因素。
J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 6;18(Suppl. 1):104-109. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000675. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
9
A comparison of the outcomes of one-stage and two-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas.一期和两期肱动脉-贵要静脉动静脉内瘘术的结果比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Nov;58(5):1300-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.030. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
10
Increased minimum vein diameter on preoperative mapping with duplex ultrasound is associated with arteriovenous fistula maturation and secondary patency.术前双功能超声检查中静脉最小直径的增加与动静脉瘘成熟和二次通畅有关。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.092. Epub 2014 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Patency and effectiveness of vascular access for hemodialysis patients: a descriptive study.血液透析患者血管通路的通畅性和有效性:一项描述性研究。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2025 Jun 18;22(2):94-99. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2025.152244. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for autologous arteriovenous fistula thrombosis in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.维持性血液透析患者自体动静脉内瘘血栓形成风险预测模型的开发与验证
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2477832. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2477832. Epub 2025 May 13.
3
Shared decision making in elderly patients with kidney failure.
老年肾衰竭患者的共同决策
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 Apr 26;39(5):742-751. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad211.
4
Management of Immature Arteriovenous Fistulas.不成熟动静脉瘘的处理。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Sep;46(9):1125-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03440-y. Epub 2023 May 4.
5
Strategies to counteract adverse remodeling of vascular graft: A 3D view of current graft innovations.对抗血管移植物不良重塑的策略:当前移植物创新的三维视角。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jan 10;10:1097334. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1097334. eCollection 2022.
6
The association of erythropoietin-stimulating agents and increased risk for AV-fistula dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. A retrospective analysis.促红细胞生成素刺激剂与血液透析患者动静脉瘘功能障碍风险增加的关联。一项回顾性分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2021 Jan 18;22(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02209-6.
7
Arteriovenous Fistula Placement, Maturation, and Patency Loss in Older Patients Initiating Hemodialysis.老年血液透析患者动静脉瘘的建立、成熟和失功。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Oct;76(4):480-489.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.02.449. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Radial artery diameterand and age related functional maturation of the radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula.桡动脉直径与头臂静脉动静脉瘘的年龄相关功能成熟度。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Jun 22;21(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01883-w.
9
A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility study.一项评估老年晚期肾病患者移植物与瘘管血管通路策略的随机试验性研究:可行性研究结果
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Jun 17;6:86. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00619-9. eCollection 2020.
10
Arteriovenous access in hemodialysis: A multidisciplinary perspective for future solutions.血液透析中的动静脉通路:未来解决方案的多学科视角
Int J Artif Organs. 2021 Jan;44(1):3-16. doi: 10.1177/0391398820922231. Epub 2020 May 22.