Suppr超能文献

初次与翻修前交叉韧带重建:患者人口统计学、影像学发现和相关损伤。

Primary Versus Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Patient Demographics, Radiographic Findings, and Associated Lesions.

机构信息

Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin, U.S.A.; Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.

The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 Mar;34(3):695-703. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.305. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in intra-articular pathology, demographic characteristics, and radiographic characteristics of the knee associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus revision ACLR at the time of initial presentation with either a native anterior cruciate ligament tear or an anterior cruciate ligament graft tear. Secondarily, we aimed to investigate risk factors for concomitant medial and lateral meniscal tears and cartilage injuries at the time of ACLR.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent primary or revision ACLR by a single surgeon. The exclusion criteria were as follows: skeletally immature patients; patients with an intra-articular fracture; patients with an ipsilateral knee infection; or patients who underwent an osteotomy, cartilage restoration procedure, or meniscal transplantation either previously or concomitantly with the ACLR. Detailed patient demographic data, radiographic long-standing alignment, tibial slope, and intraoperative findings including articular cartilage injury grade and meniscus integrity were documented at surgery.

RESULTS

There were 487 patients included in this study (363 with primary ACLR and 124 with revision ACLR). There were no significant differences in age (P = .119), sex (P = .917), body mass index (P = .468), allograft versus autograft reconstruction (P = .916), or prevalence of meniscal tears (P = .142) between the primary and revision groups. Patients who underwent revision ACLR had a significantly increased medial tibial slope (P = .048) and a higher prevalence of chondral defects on both the medial (P < .001) and lateral (P = .003) femoral condyles when compared with primary ACLR patients. Logistic regression showed that a decreased tibial slope was correlated with femoral medial-sided chondral injuries and that varus or valgus coronal-plane malalignment was correlated with lateral meniscal tears in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study show that patients undergoing a revision ACLR have significantly more chondral lesions, as well as higher-grade chondral lesions, at the time of presentation. Furthermore, coronal malalignment and a decreased tibial slope may contribute to injury patterns of the lateral meniscus and medial compartment cartilage, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估初次就诊时伴或不伴前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂的原发性和复发性 ACL 重建(ACLR)患者的关节内病理、人口统计学特征和膝关节影像学特征的差异。其次,我们旨在研究 ACLR 时并发内侧和外侧半月板撕裂以及软骨损伤的危险因素。

方法

这是对一位外科医生进行的原发性或复发性 ACLR 患者进行的回顾性研究。排除标准如下:骨骼未成熟的患者;关节内骨折的患者;同侧膝关节感染的患者;或既往或同时行关节切开术、软骨修复术或半月板移植术的患者。在手术时详细记录了患者的详细人口统计学数据、放射学长期对线、胫骨斜率以及术中发现,包括关节软骨损伤程度和半月板完整性。

结果

本研究共纳入 487 例患者(363 例原发性 ACLR 和 124 例复发性 ACLR)。两组在年龄(P=0.119)、性别(P=0.917)、体重指数(P=0.468)、同种异体移植物与自体移植物重建(P=0.916)或半月板撕裂的发生率(P=0.142)方面无显著差异。与原发性 ACLR 患者相比,行复发性 ACLR 的患者的内侧胫骨斜率显著增加(P=0.048),并且内侧(P<0.001)和外侧(P=0.003)股骨髁的软骨缺损发生率更高。Logistic 回归显示,胫骨斜率降低与股骨内侧软骨损伤相关,而冠状面内翻或外翻畸形与两组的外侧半月板撕裂相关。

结论

本研究结果表明,行复发性 ACLR 的患者在初次就诊时,软骨损伤明显更多,且软骨损伤程度更严重。此外,冠状面对线不良和胫骨斜率降低可能分别导致外侧半月板和内侧间室软骨的损伤模式。

证据等级

三级,回顾性病例对照研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验