Riva Giulia, Marvaso Giulia, Augugliaro Matteo, Zerini Dario, Fodor Cristiana, Musi Gennaro, De Cobelli Ottavio, Orecchia Roberto, Jereczek-Fossa Barbara Alicja
Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2017 Nov 30;11:786. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.786. eCollection 2017.
The current standard of care for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) at diagnosis is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without anti-androgen and chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to define the role of a local radiotherapy (RT) treatment in the mPCa setting.
We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with PCa and bone oligometastases at diagnosis treated in our institution with ADT followed by cytoreductive prostate-RT with or without RT on metastases. Biochemical and clinical failure (BF, CF), overall survival (OS) and RT-toxicity were assessed.
We identified 22 patients treated with ADT and external-beam RT on primary between June 2008 and March 2016. All of them but four were also treated for bone metastases. RT on primary with moderately and extremely hypofractionated regimes started after 10.3 months (3.9-51.7) from ADT. After a median follow-up of 26.4 months (10.3-55.5), 20 patients are alive. Twelve patients showed BF after a median time of 23 months (14.5-104) and CF after a median of 23.6 months (15.3-106.1) from the start of ADT. Three patients became castration resistant, starting a new therapy; median time to castration resistance was 31.03 months (range: 29.9-31.5 months). According to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC), only one patient developed acute grade 3 genitourinary toxicity. No late grade >2 adverse events were observed.
Prostate RT in oligometastatic patients is safe and offers long-lasting local control. When compared to ADT alone, RT on primary seems to improve biochemical control and long-term survival; however, this hypothesis should be investigated in prospective studies. Further research is warranted.
转移性前列腺癌(mPCa)患者确诊时的当前标准治疗方案是雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT),可联合或不联合抗雄激素药物及化疗。本研究的目的是明确局部放疗(RT)在mPCa治疗中的作用。
我们回顾性分析了我院确诊时患有前列腺癌和骨寡转移的患者数据,这些患者接受了ADT治疗,随后接受了减瘤性前列腺RT,部分患者还接受了或未接受转移灶RT。评估了生化和临床失败(BF、CF)、总生存期(OS)以及RT毒性。
我们确定了22例在2008年6月至2016年3月期间接受ADT及原发灶外照射RT的患者。除4例患者外,其余患者均接受了骨转移灶治疗。原发灶采用中度和极度低分割放疗方案在ADT开始后10.3个月(3.9 - 51.7)开始。中位随访26.4个月(10.3 - 55.5)后,20例患者存活。12例患者在ADT开始后中位23个月(14.5 - 104)出现BF,中位23.6个月(15.3 - 106.1)出现CF。3例患者出现去势抵抗,开始新的治疗;去势抵抗的中位时间为31.03个月(范围:29.9 - 31.5个月)。根据放射治疗肿瘤学组/欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(RTOG/EORTC)标准,仅1例患者出现3级急性泌尿生殖系统毒性。未观察到晚期>2级不良事件。
寡转移患者的前列腺RT安全且能提供持久的局部控制。与单纯ADT相比,原发灶RT似乎能改善生化控制和长期生存;然而,这一假设应在前瞻性研究中进行调查。有必要进行进一步研究。