Suppr超能文献

按自杀方法分类的特征:老年人分析。

Profiles by suicide methods: an analysis of older adults.

机构信息

a Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, Griffith University , Brisbane.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2019 Mar;23(3):385-391. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1411884. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate choice of suicide method in individuals aged 65 years and over.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Queensland Suicide Register, Australia. Univariate and multi-variate logistic regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The predominant methods in older adults were hanging (21.5%), firearms and explosives (20.9%), drug poisoning (18.5%), followed by other poisoning (mainly MVCO) (12.6%), suffocation by plastic bag (8.5%), and drowning (6%). Some methods (e.g. firearms and explosives, drug poisoning, suffocation) appeared characterised by profiles (e.g., socio-demographic and clinical aspects), meanwhile others were not well distinguishable. Compared to other methods, those who died by firearms and explosives were significantly more likely to be males, Australian born, live in rural and remote areas, and less likely to have a mental illness, previous suicide attempt(s) or leave a suicide note. Those who died by drug poisoning were more likely to be females, leave a suicide note, experience interpersonal conflict and live in urban areas. Similarly, those who chose suffocation by plastic bag were more likely to be older females, leave a suicide note, and pay attention to suicide in the media, but less likely to experience interpersonal conflict.

CONCLUSION

Acceptability, availability and lethality are important factors impacting choice of means and should be considered when designing suicide prevention activities in older adults.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨 65 岁及以上人群的自杀方法选择。

方法

数据来自澳大利亚昆士兰州自杀登记处。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。

结果

老年人中主要的自杀方法是上吊(21.5%)、使用枪支和爆炸物(20.9%)、药物中毒(18.5%),其次是其他中毒(主要是 MVCO)(12.6%)、塑料袋窒息(8.5%)和溺水(6%)。有些方法(如枪支和爆炸物、药物中毒、窒息)似乎具有特征(如社会人口统计学和临床方面),而其他方法则不太容易区分。与其他方法相比,使用枪支和爆炸物自杀的人更有可能是男性、澳大利亚出生、居住在农村和偏远地区,且不太可能患有精神疾病、有过自杀企图或留下遗书。药物中毒自杀的人更有可能是女性、留下遗书、经历人际冲突和居住在城市地区。同样,选择塑料袋窒息自杀的人更有可能是年长的女性、留下遗书、关注媒体上的自杀事件,但不太可能经历人际冲突。

结论

可接受性、可用性和致命性是影响手段选择的重要因素,在为老年人设计自杀预防活动时应加以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验