Matthaiou D K, Dimopoulos G, Taccone F S, Bulpa P, Van den Abeele A M, Misset B, Meersseman W, Spapen H, Cardoso T, Charles P E, Vogelaers D, Blot S
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Med Mycol. 2018 Aug 1;56(6):668-678. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx117.
Data regarding the epidemiology and diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in the critically ill population are limited, with data regarding elderly patients (≥75 years old) even scarcer. We aimed to further compare the epidemiology, characteristics and outcome of elderly versus nonelderly critically ill patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA) Prospective, international, multicenter observational study (AspICU) including adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients, with a culture and/or direct examination and/or histopathological sample positive for Aspergillus spp. at any site. We compared clinical characteristics and outcome of IA in ICU patients using two different diagnostic algorithms. Elderly and nonelderly ICU patients with IA differed in a number of characteristics, including comorbidities, clinical features of the disease, mycology testing, and radiological findings. No difference regarding mortality was found. According to the clinical algorithm, elderly patients were more likely to be diagnosed with putative IA. Elderly patients had less diagnostic radiological findings and when these findings were present they were detected late in the disease course. The comparison between elderly survivors and nonsurvivors demonstrated differences in clinical characteristics of the disease, affected sites and supportive therapy needed. All patients who were diagnosed with proven IA died. Increased vigilance combined with active search for mycological laboratory evidence and radiological confirmation are necessary for the timely diagnosis of IA in the elderly patient subset. Although elderly state per se is not a particular risk factor for mortality, a high SOFA score and the decision not to administer antifungal therapy may have an impact on survival of elderly patients.
关于重症患者侵袭性曲霉病的流行病学和诊断的数据有限,关于老年患者(≥75岁)的数据更为稀少。我们旨在进一步比较老年与非老年重症侵袭性曲霉病(IA)患者的流行病学、特征和结局。前瞻性、国际性、多中心观察性研究(AspICU),纳入成年重症监护病房(ICU)患者,其任何部位的培养和/或直接检查和/或组织病理学样本中曲霉属呈阳性。我们使用两种不同的诊断算法比较了ICU患者IA的临床特征和结局。老年和非老年IA患者在许多特征上存在差异,包括合并症、疾病的临床特征、真菌学检测和影像学表现。未发现死亡率方面的差异。根据临床算法,老年患者更有可能被诊断为疑似IA。老年患者的诊断性影像学表现较少,且当这些表现出现时,在病程后期才被发现。老年幸存者与非幸存者之间的比较显示出疾病的临床特征、受累部位和所需支持治疗方面的差异。所有被诊断为确诊IA的患者均死亡。提高警惕并积极寻找真菌学实验室证据和影像学确认对于老年患者亚组中IA的及时诊断是必要的。虽然老年本身不是死亡的特定危险因素,但高序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和不给予抗真菌治疗的决定可能会影响老年患者的生存。