• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术中无钳主动脉吻合围手术期卒中的发生率。

Incidence of perioperative stroke in clampless aortic anastomosis during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

作者信息

Formica Francesco, Tata Giuseppe, Singh Gurmeet, Mariani Serena, D'Alessandro Stefano, Messina Luigi Amerigo, Sangalli Fabio, Paolini Giovanni

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Surgery, Cardiac Surgery Clinic, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via G.B. Pergolesi 33, 20052, Monza, MB, Italy.

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2018 Jun;33(6):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-1106-0. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00380-017-1106-0
PMID:29230573
Abstract

This study aimed to assess if clampless off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) decreases the incidence of perioperative stroke (POS) rate and in-hospital mortality. The secondary aim was to evaluate 12-year rates of overall mortality. Between January 2003 to December 2015, data of 645 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG were retrospectively collected. 363 underwent aortic no-touch OPCAB (No-touch group) and 282 underwent OPCAB with the Heartstring device (HS group). In-hospital mortality and perioperative stroke rate as primary endpoint, as well as long-term follow-up outcome were analysed. In-hospital mortality was lower into No-touch group compared with HS group but without significant statistical difference (1.7 vs. 3.2%, p = 0.19, respectively); the rate of postoperative stroke was higher in No-touch group compared with HS group, although this difference did not reach statistically significance. Delirium was reported with higher presentation rate in HS group (3.9 vs. 0.8%, p = 0.01). Blood transfusions rate was higher in HS subjects (23.4 vs. 16.1%, p = 0.01). Intubation time, ICU, and hospital length of stay were increased in the HS group (p = 0.008, p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Over a 12-year follow-up period, survival probabilities at 1, 5, and 10 years were 93.6 ± 1.3 vs. 93.2 ± 1.5, 80.4 ± 2.6 vs. 80.3 ± 2.2, and 57.9 ± 5 vs. 58.4 ± 3.8% in the No-touch and HS group, respectively (p = 0.97). In this retrospective study, clampless off-pump CABG lowers perioperative stroke rate whose incidence is, however, not inferior compared with No-touch technique, and no statistically significance was detected. Delirium has a higher presentation rate in clampless off-pump CABG.

摘要

本研究旨在评估非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)无钳夹操作是否能降低围手术期卒中(POS)发生率和院内死亡率。次要目的是评估12年总体死亡率。在2003年1月至2015年12月期间,回顾性收集了645例连续接受单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的数据。363例行主动脉非接触式OPCAB(非接触组),282例行使用Heartstring装置的OPCAB(HS组)。分析院内死亡率和围手术期卒中率作为主要终点,以及长期随访结果。非接触组的院内死亡率低于HS组,但无显著统计学差异(分别为1.7%对3.2%,p = 0.19);非接触组术后卒中率高于HS组,尽管这种差异未达到统计学显著性。HS组谵妄发生率较高(3.9%对0.8%,p = 0.01)。HS组患者输血率较高(23.4%对16.1%,p = 0.01)。HS组插管时间、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间均延长(分别为p = 0.008、p = 0.001和p = 0.003)。在12年的随访期内,非接触组和HS组1年、5年和10年的生存概率分别为93.6±1.3%对93.2±1.5%、80.4±2.6%对80.3±2.2%、57.9±5%对58.4±3.8%(p = 0.97)。在这项回顾性研究中,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术无钳夹操作可降低围手术期卒中率,但其发生率与非接触技术相比并不低,且未检测到统计学显著性。非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术无钳夹操作谵妄发生率较高。

相似文献

1
Incidence of perioperative stroke in clampless aortic anastomosis during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术中无钳主动脉吻合围手术期卒中的发生率。
Heart Vessels. 2018 Jun;33(6):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-1106-0. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
2
Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.主动脉非接触技术使非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术有所不同。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;142(6):1499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
3
Clampless off-pump versus conventional coronary artery revascularization: a propensity score analysis of 788 patients.无夹闭非体外循环与传统冠状动脉血运重建术的比较:788 例患者的倾向性评分分析。
Circulation. 2012 Sep 11;126(11 Suppl 1):S176-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084285.
4
Clampless off-pump surgery reduces stroke in patients with left main disease.无夹闭非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术降低左主干病变患者的中风发生率。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):2097-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.116. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
5
Partially anaortic clampless off-pump coronary artery bypass prevents neurologic injury compared to on-pump coronary surgery: a propensity score-matched study on 286 patients.与体外循环冠状动脉手术相比,部分主动脉无钳夹非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术可预防神经损伤:一项对286例患者的倾向评分匹配研究。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Sep;31(9):1412-7. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0748-z. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Effects of a Proximal Seal System on Neurologic Outcomes of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.近端封闭系统对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术神经学结局的影响。
Int Heart J. 2019 May 30;60(3):593-600. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-283. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Manipulation of the Ascending Aorta: A Network Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术联合与不联合升主动脉操作:一项网状 Meta 分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 28;69(8):924-936. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.071.
8
Off-pump no-touch technique: 3-year results compared with the SYNTAX trial.非体外循环非接触技术:与SYNTAX试验相比的3年结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 May;20(5):601-4. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv012. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
9
No-touch aorta off-pump coronary surgery: the effect on stroke.非接触式不停跳冠状动脉搭桥手术:对中风的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Feb;129(2):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.06.013.
10
Anaortic off-pump versus clampless off-pump using the PAS-Port device versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: mid-term results from a matched propensity score analysis of 5422 unselected patients.非体外循环主动脉根部无接触与 PAS-Port 装置无接触非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与传统冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:5422 例未经选择患者倾向性评分匹配分析的中期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):760-767. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx235.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequential left internal mammary artery grafting in combination with the aortic no-touch technique.序贯性左乳内动脉移植联合主动脉非接触技术。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2022 Sep;19(3):135-140. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2022.119761. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Operative strategies to reduce cerebral embolic events during on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A stratified, prospective randomized trial.在不停跳和停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术中减少脑栓塞事件的手术策略:分层、前瞻性随机试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;154(4):1278-1285.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.04.089. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
2
Patency of Saphenous Vein Grafts Using the PAS-Port System During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术中使用PAS-Port系统时隐静脉移植物的通畅性
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Aug;104(2):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.014. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
3
The impact of surgical left atrial appendage amputation/ligation on stroke prevention in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
手术切除/结扎左心耳对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者预防卒中的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2017 Jun;32(6):726-734. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0915-x. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
4
Cerebrovascular Events After No-Touch Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Conventional Side-Clamp Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass, and Proximal Anastomotic Devices: A Meta-Analysis.非接触式不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术、传统侧钳夹不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术及近端吻合器械术后脑血管事件:一项荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 18;5(2):e002802. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002802.
5
Is off-pump technique a safer procedure for coronary revascularization? A propensity score analysis of 20 years of experience.非体外循环技术用于冠状动脉血运重建是否更安全?一项基于20年经验的倾向评分分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 May;22(5):612-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw005. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Partially anaortic clampless off-pump coronary artery bypass prevents neurologic injury compared to on-pump coronary surgery: a propensity score-matched study on 286 patients.与体外循环冠状动脉手术相比,部分主动脉无钳夹非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术可预防神经损伤:一项对286例患者的倾向评分匹配研究。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Sep;31(9):1412-7. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0748-z. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Meta-analysis.与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术相比,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术可改善高危患者的短期预后:荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):60-77.e1-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.042. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
8
Total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was not associated with inferior outcomes for diabetic when compared with non-diabetic patients.与非糖尿病患者相比,全动脉非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与糖尿病患者较差的预后无关。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec;21(6):705-11. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv234. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
9
Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16,900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials†.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的当前证据:一项对超过16900例患者进行随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Apr;49(4):1031-41; discussion 1041. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv268. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
10
Stroke associated with coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术相关的中风
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;63(9):487-95. doi: 10.1007/s11748-015-0572-5. Epub 2015 Jul 8.