Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.
Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;154(4):1278-1285.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.04.089. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
To determine the impact of different aortic clamping strategies on the incidence of cerebral embolic events during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Between 2012 and 2015, 142 patients with low-grade aortic disease (epiaortic ultrasound grade I/II) undergoing primary isolated CABG were studied. Those undergoing off-pump CABG were randomized to a partial clamp (n = 36) or clampless facilitating device (CFD; n = 36) strategy. Those undergoing on-pump CABG were randomized to a single-clamp (n = 34) or double-clamp (n = 36) strategy. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) was performed to identify high-intensity transient signals (HITS) in the middle cerebral arteries during periods of aortic manipulation. Neurocognitive testing was performed at baseline and 30-days postoperatively. The primary endpoint was total number of HITS detected by TCD. Groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.
In the off-pump group, the median number of total HITS were higher in the CFD subgroup (30.0; interquartile range [IQR], 22-43) compared with the partial clamp subgroup (7.0; IQR, 0-16; P < .0001). In the CFD subgroup, the median number of total HITS was significantly lower for patients with 1 CFD compared with patients with >1 CFD (12.5 [IQR, 4-19] vs 36.0 [IQR, 25-47]; P = .001). In the on-pump group, the median number of total HITS was 10.0 (IQR, 3-17) in the single-clamp group, compared with 16.0 (IQR, 4-49) in the double-clamp group (P = .10). There were no differences in neurocognitive outcomes across the groups.
For patients with low-grade aortic disease, the use of CFDs was associated with an increased rate of cerebral embolic events compared with partial clamping during off-pump CABG. A single-clamp strategy during on-pump CABG did not significantly reduce embolic events compared with a double-clamp strategy.
确定在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)期间不同主动脉夹闭策略对脑栓塞事件发生率的影响。
在 2012 年至 2015 年期间,对 142 例患有低等级主动脉疾病(主动脉上超声分级 I/II)的患者进行了研究,这些患者接受了单纯的 CABG 手术。其中,接受非体外循环 CABG 的患者被随机分为部分夹闭(n=36)或无夹闭辅助装置(CFD;n=36)策略组。接受体外循环 CABG 的患者被随机分为单夹(n=34)或双夹(n=36)策略组。在主动脉操作期间,经颅多普勒超声(TCD)用于识别大脑中动脉中的高强度短暂信号(HITS)。在基线和术后 30 天时进行神经认知测试。主要终点是 TCD 检测到的总 HITS 数量。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较各组。
在非体外循环组中,CFD 亚组的总 HITS 中位数(30.0;四分位距[IQR],22-43)明显高于部分夹闭亚组(7.0;IQR,0-16;P<.0001)。在 CFD 亚组中,与 1 个 CFD 的患者相比,≥1 个 CFD 的患者的总 HITS 中位数明显更低(12.5 [IQR,4-19] 与 36.0 [IQR,25-47];P=.001)。在体外循环组中,单夹组的总 HITS 中位数为 10.0(IQR,3-17),而双夹组为 16.0(IQR,4-49)(P=.10)。各组之间的神经认知结果无差异。
对于患有低等级主动脉疾病的患者,与非体外循环 CABG 期间的部分夹闭相比,使用 CFD 与更高的脑栓塞事件发生率相关。与双夹策略相比,体外循环 CABG 期间的单夹策略并未显著减少栓塞事件。