Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 4250 Plymouth Road, SPC 5763, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2700, USA.
Center for Research on Ethnicity, Culture and Health, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Urban Health. 2018 Feb;95(1):21-35. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0217-3.
The protective effect of family structure and socioeconomic status (SES) on physical and mental health is well established. There are reports, however, documenting a smaller return of SES among Blacks compared to Whites, also known as Blacks' diminished return. Using a national sample, this study investigated race by gender differences in the effects of family structure and family SES on subsequent body mass index (BMI) over a 15-year period. This 15-year longitudinal study used data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS), in-home survey. This study followed 1781 youth from birth to age 15. The sample was composed of White males (n = 241, 13.5%), White females (n = 224, 12.6%), Black males (n = 667, 37.5%), and Black females (n = 649, 36.4%). Family structure and family SES (maternal education and income to need ratio) at birth were the independent variables. BMI at age 15 was the outcome. Race and gender were the moderators. Linear regression models were run in the pooled sample, in addition to race by gender groups. In the pooled sample, married parents, more maternal education, and income to need ratio were all protective against high BMI of youth at 15 years of age. Race interacted with family structure, maternal education, and income to need ratio on BMI, indicating smaller effects for Blacks compared to Whites. Gender did not interact with SES indicators on BMI. Race by gender stratified regressions showed the most consistent associations between family SES and future BMI for White females followed by White males. Family structure, maternal education, and income to need ratio were not associated with lower BMI in Black males or females. The health gain received from family economic resources over time is smaller for male and female Black youth than for male and female White youth. Equalizing access to economic resources may not be enough to eliminate health disparities in obesity. Policies should address qualitative differences in the lives of Whites and Blacks which result in diminished health returns with similar SES resources. Policies should address structural and societal barriers that hold Blacks against translation of their SES resources to health outcomes.
家庭结构和社会经济地位(SES)对身心健康的保护作用已得到充分证实。然而,有报道称,与白人相比,黑人的 SES 回报较小,也称为黑人回报减少。本研究使用全国样本,调查了家庭结构和家庭 SES 对随后 15 年内身体质量指数(BMI)的影响在性别方面的种族差异。这项为期 15 年的纵向研究使用了脆弱家庭和儿童福利研究(FFCWS)的入户调查数据。这项研究跟踪了 1781 名从出生到 15 岁的青少年。样本由白人男性(n=241,13.5%)、白人女性(n=224,12.6%)、黑人男性(n=667,37.5%)和黑人女性(n=649,36.4%)组成。出生时的家庭结构和家庭 SES(母亲的教育程度和收入需求比)为自变量。15 岁时的 BMI 为因变量。种族和性别为调节变量。在总样本中运行线性回归模型,以及按种族和性别分组运行。在总样本中,已婚父母、母亲受教育程度较高和收入需求比均能保护青少年在 15 岁时的 BMI 不高。种族与家庭结构、母亲教育程度和收入需求比在 BMI 上相互作用,表明黑人的影响较小。性别与 SES 指标对 BMI 没有相互作用。按种族和性别分层回归显示,家庭 SES 与未来 BMI 之间的关联最一致的是白人女性,其次是白人男性。家庭结构、母亲教育程度和收入需求比与黑人男性或女性较低的 BMI 无关。与白人青年相比,黑人男性和女性青年从家庭经济资源中获得的健康收益随着时间的推移会减少。平等获得经济资源可能不足以消除肥胖方面的健康差距。政策应解决导致 SES 资源相同但健康回报减少的白人和黑人生活中的定性差异。政策应解决阻碍黑人将 SES 资源转化为健康结果的结构性和社会障碍。