Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of MDHS, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Developmental Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Mar;60(3):230-243. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13631. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
To systematically review the measurement properties of instruments assessing participation in young people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
A search was performed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed combining three constructs ('ASD', 'test of participation', 'measurement properties'). Results were restricted to articles including people aged 6 to 29 years. The 2539 identified articles were independently screened by two reviewers. For the included articles, data were extracted using standard forms and their risk of bias was assessed.
Nine studies (8 cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria, providing information on seven different instruments. The total sample included 634 participants, with sex available for 600 (males=494; females=106) and age available for 570, with mean age for these participants 140.58 months (SD=9.11; range=36-624). Included instruments were the school function assessment, vocational index, children's assessment of participation and enjoyment/preferences for activities of children, experience sampling method, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, Computer Adaptive Test, adolescent and young adult activity card sort, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System parent-proxy peer relationships. Seven studies assessed reliability and validity; good properties were reported for half of the instruments considered. Most studies (n=6) had high risk of bias. Overall the quality of the evidence for each tool was limited.
Validation of these instruments, or others that comprehensively assess participation, is needed. Future studies should follow recommended methodological standards.
Seven instruments have been used to assess participation in young people with autism. One instrument, with excellent measurement properties in one study, does not comprehensively assess participation. Studies of three instruments that incorporate a more comprehensive assessment of participation have methodological limitations. Overall, limited evidence exists regarding measurement properties of participation assessments for young people with autism.
系统评价评估自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)青少年参与度的工具的测量特性。
在 MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 PubMed 中进行了一次搜索,将三个结构(“ASD”、“参与测试”和“测量特性”)结合起来。结果仅限于包括 6 至 29 岁人群的文章。2539 篇鉴定文章由两位评审员独立筛选。对于纳入的文章,使用标准表格提取数据,并评估其偏倚风险。
符合纳入标准的有 9 项研究(8 项为横断面研究),提供了 7 种不同工具的信息。总样本包括 634 名参与者,其中 600 名(男性=494;女性=106)的性别信息可用,570 名的年龄信息可用,这些参与者的平均年龄为 140.58 个月(标准差=9.11;范围=36-624)。纳入的工具包括学校功能评估、职业指数、儿童参与和享受/活动偏好评估、体验抽样法、残疾儿童评估量表、计算机自适应测试、青少年和年轻成人活动卡片分类、患者报告的结果测量信息系统家长-代理同伴关系。有 7 项研究评估了可靠性和有效性;一半被认为的工具具有良好的特性。大多数研究(n=6)存在高偏倚风险。总体而言,每种工具的证据质量有限。
需要对这些工具或其他全面评估参与度的工具进行验证。未来的研究应遵循推荐的方法学标准。
有七种工具被用于评估自闭症青少年的参与度。一种工具在一项研究中具有优异的测量特性,但没有全面评估参与度。有三项工具的研究纳入了对参与度的更全面评估,但存在方法学限制。总体而言,自闭症青少年参与度评估的测量特性的证据有限。