Vanhecke Dimitri, Kuhn Dagmar A, Jimenez de Aberasturi Dorleta, Balog Sandor, Milosevic Ana, Urban Dominic, Peckys Diana, de Jonge Niels, Parak Wolfgang J, Petri-Fink Alke, Rothen-Rutishauser Barbara
Adolphe Merkle Institute, Université de Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, CH 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
CIC Biomagune, Miramon Ibilbidea 182, 20014 Donostia, Gipuzkoa, San Sebastian, Spain.
Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2017 Nov 14;8:2396-2409. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.8.239. eCollection 2017.
Little is known about the simultaneous uptake of different engineered nanoparticle types, as it can be expected in our daily life. In order to test such co-exposure effects, murine macrophages (J774A.1 cell line) were incubated with gold (AuNPs) and iron oxide nanoparticles (FeO NPs) either alone or combined. Environmental scanning electron microscopy revealed that single NPs of both types bound within minutes on the cell surface but with a distinctive difference between FeO NPs and AuNPs. Uptake analysis studies based on laser scanning microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry revealed intracellular appearance of both NP types in all exposure scenarios and a time-dependent increase. This increase was higher for both AuNPs and FeO NPs during co-exposure. Cells treated with endocytotic inhibitors recovered after co-exposure, which additionally hinted that two uptake mechanisms are involved. Cross-talk between uptake pathways is relevant for toxicological studies: Co-exposure acts as an uptake accelerant. If the goal is to maximize the cellular uptake, e.g., for the delivery of pharmaceutical agents, this can be beneficial. However, co-exposure should also be taken into account in the case of risk assessment of occupational settings. The demonstration of co-exposure-invoked pathway interactions reveals that synergetic nanoparticle effects, either positive or negative, must be considered for nanotechnology and nanomedicine in particular to develop to its full potential.
对于不同类型的工程纳米颗粒在日常生活中可能出现的同时摄取情况,人们了解甚少。为了测试这种共同暴露效应,将小鼠巨噬细胞(J774A.1细胞系)分别与金纳米颗粒(AuNPs)和氧化铁纳米颗粒(FeO NPs)单独或联合孵育。环境扫描电子显微镜显示,两种类型的单个纳米颗粒在数分钟内就结合在细胞表面,但FeO NPs和AuNPs之间存在明显差异。基于激光扫描显微镜、透射电子显微镜和电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法的摄取分析研究表明,在所有暴露情况下,两种纳米颗粒类型均在细胞内出现,且呈时间依赖性增加。在共同暴露期间,AuNPs和FeO NPs的这种增加幅度更大。用内吞抑制剂处理的细胞在共同暴露后恢复,这进一步暗示涉及两种摄取机制。摄取途径之间的相互作用与毒理学研究相关:共同暴露起摄取促进剂的作用。如果目标是最大化细胞摄取,例如用于药物递送,这可能是有益的。然而,在职业环境风险评估的情况下,也应考虑共同暴露。共同暴露引发的途径相互作用的证明表明,特别是对于纳米技术和纳米医学,要充分发挥其潜力,必须考虑纳米颗粒的协同效应,无论是正面还是负面的。