• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于模拟器的航空决策训练方法。

A simulator-based approach to training in aeronautical decision making.

作者信息

Connolly T J, Blackwell B B, Lester L F

机构信息

Department of Aeronautical Science, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL 32014.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989 Jan;60(1):50-2.

PMID:2923595
Abstract

The effectiveness of a simulator-based approach to training pilot skills in risk assessment and decision making was evaluated in a sample of pilots enrolled in a university aviation science program. The 16 experimental group subjects received 4 hours (h) of classroom instruction designed to enhance pilot judgment skills, followed by 4 simulated cross-country flights during which several critical inflight events occurred. Subjects in the control group received classroom instruction in basic instrument flying, followed by simulator sessions emphasizing instrument flight. Measures of pilot judgment were obtained on all subjects before and after the training, and subjects in the experimental judgment-trained group performed significantly better on the posttraining simulation than did control group subjects. The findings suggest that significant gains in pilot decision-making skill can be obtained through the use of the judgment training materials along with simulator practice.

摘要

在一个大学航空科学项目的飞行员样本中,评估了一种基于模拟器的方法在培训飞行员风险评估和决策技能方面的有效性。16名实验组受试者接受了4小时旨在提高飞行员判断技能的课堂教学,随后进行了4次模拟越野飞行,期间发生了几次关键的飞行事件。对照组受试者接受了基本仪表飞行的课堂教学,随后进行了强调仪表飞行的模拟器训练。在训练前后对所有受试者进行了飞行员判断测试,实验性判断训练组的受试者在训练后的模拟测试中的表现明显优于对照组受试者。研究结果表明,通过使用判断训练材料和模拟器练习,可以显著提高飞行员的决策技能。

相似文献

1
A simulator-based approach to training in aeronautical decision making.一种基于模拟器的航空决策训练方法。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989 Jan;60(1):50-2.
2
Autogenic Feedback Training Exercise and pilot performance: enhanced functioning under search-and-rescue flying conditions.自生反馈训练练习与飞行员表现:在搜救飞行条件下功能增强
Int J Aviat Psychol. 2001;11(3):303-15. doi: 10.1207/S15327108IJAP1103_04.
3
Aeronautical decision making: instructor-pilot evaluation of five mnemonic methods.航空决策:教员飞行员对五种记忆方法的评估。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Dec;76(12):1156-61.
4
A study of decision-making behavior of aircraft pilots deviating from a planned flight.一项关于偏离计划航线的飞机飞行员决策行为的研究。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1982 Oct;53(10):958-63.
5
Pilot behaviors in the face of adverse weather: A new look at an old problem.面对恶劣天气时的飞行员行为:对一个老问题的新审视。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Jun;76(6):552-9.
6
Pilots' perception of risks and hazards in general aviation.飞行员对通用航空中风险与危害的认知
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990 Jul;61(7):599-603.
7
Flight leads and crisis decision-making.飞行领导与危机决策。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1993 May;64(5):359-62.
8
Selecting pilots with crew resource management skills.选拔具备机组资源管理技能的飞行员。
Int J Aviat Psychol. 2000 Oct;10(4):377-92. doi: 10.1207/S15327108IJAP1004_5.
9
Risk tolerance and pilot involvement in hazardous events and flight into adverse weather.风险承受能力以及飞行员参与危险事件和飞入恶劣天气的情况。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(4):403-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.05.009. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
10
Situational and personal characteristics associated with adverse weather encounters by pilots.飞行员遭遇恶劣天气的情境和个人特征。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):176-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Ecological Dynamics as an Accurate and Parsimonious Contributor to Applied Practice: A Critical Appraisal.生态动力学作为应用实践的准确而简约的贡献因素:批判性评估
Sports Med. 2025 Apr;55(4):799-810. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02161-7. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
2
Framework and Schema are False Synonyms: Defining Terms to Improve Learning.框架和模式并非同义词:定义术语以促进学习。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jul 28;12(1):294-303. doi: 10.5334/pme.947. eCollection 2023.