Suppr超能文献

生态动力学作为应用实践的准确而简约的贡献因素:批判性评估

Ecological Dynamics as an Accurate and Parsimonious Contributor to Applied Practice: A Critical Appraisal.

作者信息

Collins Dave, Carson Howie J, Rylander Pär, Bobrownicki Ray

机构信息

Human Performance Science Research Group, Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Grey Matters Performance Ltd, Stratford-Upon-Avon, UK.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2025 Apr;55(4):799-810. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02161-7. Epub 2024 Dec 21.

Abstract

With sport coaches adopting and working toward increasingly evidence-grounded approaches to practice, skill acquisition has appropriately become a critical area for consideration. As part of this growing interest in skill acquisition, the ecological dynamics approach has garnered attention amongst scholars and practitioners with myriad media (e.g. peer-reviewed articles, books, podcasts and social-media outputs) extolling its benefits. In doing this, however, the available guidance, advice and scholarship have typically positioned ecological dynamics as a direct competitor to existing or traditional cognitive approaches, advising against practical integration of approaches due to theoretical incompatibility. As a standalone approach, we are concerned that there are mechanistic and epistemological issues and inconsistencies that prevent experimental comparisons and limit its applicability, novelty and capability to comprehensively address real-world athlete and coach needs. Based on this, in this Current Opinion paper, we lay out these concerns and critically examine the clarity, coherence and consistency of the approach and its associated literature. In concluding, we also suggest that a more evidence-based and mechanistically driven approach that draws upon a wider set of theoretical perspectives can offer greater benefit to athletes, coaches and practitioners in real-world sport.

摘要

随着体育教练采用并致力于越来越多地基于证据的实践方法,技能习得已理所当然地成为一个关键的考量领域。作为对技能习得日益增长的兴趣的一部分,生态动力学方法在学者和从业者中引起了关注,众多媒体(如同行评议文章、书籍、播客和社交媒体产出)都称赞其益处。然而,在这样做的过程中,现有的指导、建议和学术研究通常将生态动力学定位为现有或传统认知方法的直接竞争对手,由于理论上的不相容性,建议不要将这些方法实际整合。作为一种独立的方法,我们担心存在机械论和认识论问题以及不一致之处,这些问题阻碍了实验比较,并限制了其适用性、新颖性以及全面满足现实世界中运动员和教练需求的能力。基于此,在本篇述评文章中,我们阐述这些担忧,并批判性地审视该方法及其相关文献的清晰度、连贯性和一致性。在结论部分,我们还建议,一种更基于证据且由更广泛的理论视角驱动的方法,可以为现实世界中的运动员、教练和从业者带来更大的益处。

相似文献

9
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.

本文引用的文献

1
Is premature theorizing hurting skill acquisition research?过早进行理论化是否正在损害技能习得研究?
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Oct 10;5:1185734. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1185734. eCollection 2023.
3
Learning motor actions via imagery-perceptual or motor learning?通过意象-感知学习还是运动学习来掌握运动动作?
Psychol Res. 2024 Sep;88(6):1820-1832. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01787-4. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验