Stern Anat, Skalsky Keren, Avni Tomer, Carrara Elena, Leibovici Leonard, Paul Mical
Division of Infectious Diseases, Rambam Health Care Campus, Ha-aliya 8 St, Haifa, Israel, 33705.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 13;12(12):CD007720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007720.pub3.
Pneumonia is a common and potentially serious illness. Corticosteroids have been suggested for the treatment of different types of infection, however their role in the treatment of pneumonia remains unclear. This is an update of a review published in 2011.
To assess the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in the treatment of pneumonia.
We searched the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS on 3 March 2017, together with relevant conference proceedings and references of identified trials. We also searched three trials registers for ongoing and unpublished trials.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed systemic corticosteroid therapy, given as adjunct to antibiotic treatment, versus placebo or no corticosteroids for adults and children with pneumonia.
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We estimated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled data using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model when possible.
We included 17 RCTs comprising a total of 2264 participants; 13 RCTs included 1954 adult participants, and four RCTs included 310 children. This update included 12 new studies, excluded one previously included study, and excluded five new trials. One trial awaits classification.All trials limited inclusion to inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with or without healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP). We assessed the risk of selection bias and attrition bias as low or unclear overall. We assessed performance bias risk as low for nine trials, unclear for one trial, and high for seven trials. We assessed reporting bias risk as low for three trials and high for the remaining 14 trials.Corticosteroids significantly reduced mortality in adults with severe pneumonia (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84; moderate-quality evidence), but not in adults with non-severe pneumonia (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.00). Early clinical failure rates (defined as death from any cause, radiographic progression, or clinical instability at day 5 to 8) were significantly reduced with corticosteroids in people with severe and non-severe pneumonia (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.7; and RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.83, respectively; high-quality evidence). Corstocosteroids reduced time to clinical cure, length of hospital and intensive care unit stays, development of respiratory failure or shock not present at pneumonia onset, and rates of pneumonia complications.Among children with bacterial pneumonia, corticosteroids reduced early clinical failure rates (defined as for adults, RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.70; high-quality evidence) based on two small, clinically heterogeneous trials, and reduced time to clinical cure.Hyperglycaemia was significantly more common in adults treated with corticosteroids (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.14). There were no significant differences between corticosteroid-treated people and controls for other adverse events or secondary infections (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.93).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid therapy reduced mortality and morbidity in adults with severe CAP; the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome was 18 patients (95% CI 12 to 49) to prevent one death. Corticosteroid therapy reduced morbidity, but not mortality, for adults and children with non-severe CAP. Corticosteroid therapy was associated with more adverse events, especially hyperglycaemia, but the harms did not seem to outweigh the benefits.
肺炎是一种常见且可能严重的疾病。有人建议使用皮质类固醇治疗不同类型的感染,然而其在肺炎治疗中的作用仍不明确。这是对2011年发表的一篇综述的更新。
评估皮质类固醇治疗肺炎的疗效和安全性。
我们于2017年3月3日检索了Cochrane急性呼吸道感染小组的专业注册库、Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、Embase和LILACS,以及相关会议论文集和已识别试验的参考文献。我们还检索了三个试验注册库以查找正在进行和未发表的试验。
我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验评估了全身性皮质类固醇疗法作为抗生素治疗的辅助手段,与安慰剂或不使用皮质类固醇相比,用于治疗成人和儿童肺炎的效果。
我们采用Cochrane预期的标准方法程序。两位综述作者独立评估偏倚风险并提取数据。我们联系研究作者以获取更多信息。我们估计风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI),并在可能的情况下使用Mantel-Haenszel固定效应模型汇总数据。
我们纳入了17项RCT,共2264名参与者;13项RCT纳入了1954名成年参与者,4项RCT纳入了310名儿童。本次更新纳入了12项新研究,排除了一项先前纳入的研究,并排除了5项新试验。一项试验待分类。所有试验将纳入对象限制为社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患者,无论有无医疗相关肺炎(HCAP)。我们评估选择偏倚和失访偏倚的风险总体为低或不明确。我们评估9项试验的执行偏倚风险为低,1项试验不明确,7项试验为高。我们评估3项试验的报告偏倚风险为低,其余14项试验为高。皮质类固醇显著降低了重症肺炎成人的死亡率(RR 0.58,95%CI 0.40至0.84;中等质量证据),但对非重症肺炎成人无效(RR 0.95,95%CI 0.45至2.00)。皮质类固醇显著降低了重症和非重症肺炎患者的早期临床失败率(定义为任何原因导致的死亡、影像学进展或第5至8天的临床不稳定)(RR分别为0.32,95%CI 0.15至0.7;以及RR 0.68,95%CI 0.56至0.83;高质量证据)。皮质类固醇缩短了临床治愈时间、住院和重症监护病房住院时间,降低了肺炎发病时不存在的呼吸衰竭或休克的发生率以及肺炎并发症发生率。在患有细菌性肺炎的儿童中,基于两项小型、临床异质性试验,皮质类固醇降低了早期临床失败率(定义与成人相同,RR 0.41,95%CI 0.24至0.70;高质量证据),并缩短了临床治愈时间。接受皮质类固醇治疗的成人中高血糖症明显更常见(RR 1.72,95%CI 1.38至2.14)。在其他不良事件或继发感染方面,接受皮质类固醇治疗的人与对照组之间无显著差异(RR 1.19,95%CI 0.73至1.93)。
皮质类固醇疗法降低了重症CAP成人的死亡率和发病率;为获得额外有益结果所需治疗的人数为18名患者(95%CI 12至49)以预防1例死亡。皮质类固醇疗法降低了非重症CAP成人和儿童的发病率,但未降低死亡率。皮质类固醇疗法与更多不良事件相关,尤其是高血糖症,但危害似乎并未超过益处。