Sato Takuya, Sasabuchi Yusuke, Inokuchi Ryota, Aso Shotaro, Yasunaga Hideo, Doi Kent
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 1138655, Japan.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 1138655, Japan.
J Intensive Care. 2025 Jul 15;13(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00810-1.
Corticosteroids improve the outcomes of severe pneumonia; however, the most effective type remains unknown. In this study, we compared the mortality rates of patients with severe pneumonia who were treated with methylprednisolone versus those treated with hydrocortisone.
In this retrospective observational study, we utilized a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database to include adult patients with severe pneumonia who were admitted to hospitals between April 2017 and March 2022 and received either methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for measured confounders, with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome.
Among the 5,084 eligible patients, 623 matched pairs were analyzed. In-hospital mortality rates were 23.9% in the hydrocortisone group and 19.4% in the methylprednisolone group (risk difference [RD], 4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.082 to 9.1; p = 0.054). Subgroup analysis of patients with shock demonstrated significantly higher mortality in the hydrocortisone group than in the methylprednisolone group (44.7% versus 30.1%; RD, 14.6%; 95% CI 1.4-27.8; p = 0.031).
No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between patients with severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone and those treated with hydrocortisone. Nevertheless, patients experiencing severe pneumonia-induced septic shock may derive benefits from methylprednisolone treatment.
皮质类固醇可改善重症肺炎的治疗效果;然而,最有效的类型尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们比较了接受甲泼尼龙治疗与接受氢化可的松治疗的重症肺炎患者的死亡率。
在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们利用了日本全国诊断程序组合住院患者数据库,纳入了2017年4月至2022年3月期间入院并接受甲泼尼龙或氢化可的松治疗的成年重症肺炎患者。倾向评分匹配用于调整测量的混杂因素,以住院死亡率作为主要结局。
在5084例符合条件的患者中,分析了623对匹配病例。氢化可的松组的住院死亡率为23.9%,甲泼尼龙组为19.4%(风险差异[RD],4.5%;95%置信区间[CI]-0.082至9.1;p=0.054)。对休克患者的亚组分析显示,氢化可的松组的死亡率显著高于甲泼尼龙组(44.7%对30.1%;RD,14.6%;95%CI 1.4-27.8;p=0.031)。
接受甲泼尼龙治疗的重症肺炎患者与接受氢化可的松治疗的患者在住院死亡率方面未观察到显著差异。然而,经历重症肺炎诱导的感染性休克的患者可能从甲泼尼龙治疗中获益。