• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网站设计用于传达香烟烟雾中的化学物质信息。

Website Designs for Communicating About Chemicals in Cigarette Smoke.

机构信息

a School of Media and Journalism , University of North Carolina.

b Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health , University of North Carolina.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2019 Mar;34(3):333-342. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1407276. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2017.1407276
PMID:29236552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6031476/
Abstract

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act requires the US government to inform the public about the quantities of toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke. A website can accomplish this task efficiently, but the site's user interface must be usable to benefit the general public. We conducted online experiments with national convenience samples of 1,451 US adult smokers and nonsmokers to examine the impact of four interface display elements: the chemicals, their associated health effects, quantity information, and a visual risk indicator. Outcomes were perceptions of user experience (perceived clarity and usability), motivation (willingness to use), and potential impact (elaboration about the harms of smoking). We found displaying health effects as text with icons, providing quantity information for chemicals (e.g., ranges), and showing a visual risk indicator all improved the user experience of a webpage about chemicals in cigarette smoke (all p < .05). Displaying a combination of familiar and unfamiliar chemicals, providing quantity information for chemicals, and showing a visual risk indicator all improved motivation to use the webpage (all p < .05). Displaying health effects or quantity information increased the potential impact of the webpage (all p < .05). Overall, interface designs displaying health effects of chemicals in cigarette smoke as text with icons and with a visual risk indicator had the greatest impact on the user experience, motivation, and potential impact of the website. Our findings provide guidance for accessible website designs that can inform consumers about the toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke.

摘要

《家庭吸烟预防和烟草控制法案》要求美国政府向公众通报香烟烟雾中有毒化学物质的含量。一个网站可以有效地完成这项任务,但网站的用户界面必须是可用的,才能使广大公众受益。我们对全国 1451 名美国成年吸烟者和不吸烟者的便利样本进行了在线实验,以检验四种界面显示元素的影响:化学物质、它们与健康相关的影响、数量信息和视觉风险指标。结果是对用户体验(感知清晰度和可用性)、动机(使用意愿)和潜在影响(对吸烟危害的阐述)的看法。我们发现,用图标显示健康影响、提供化学物质的数量信息(例如,范围)以及显示视觉风险指标都可以改善关于香烟烟雾中化学物质的网页的用户体验(所有 p 值均小于 0.05)。显示熟悉和不熟悉的化学物质组合、提供化学物质的数量信息以及显示视觉风险指标都可以提高使用网页的动机(所有 p 值均小于 0.05)。显示健康影响或数量信息增加了网页的潜在影响(所有 p 值均小于 0.05)。总的来说,以图标和视觉风险指标显示香烟烟雾中化学物质的健康影响的界面设计对网站的用户体验、动机和潜在影响产生了最大的影响。我们的研究结果为能够告知消费者香烟烟雾中有毒化学物质的可访问网站设计提供了指导。

相似文献

1
Website Designs for Communicating About Chemicals in Cigarette Smoke.网站设计用于传达香烟烟雾中的化学物质信息。
Health Commun. 2019 Mar;34(3):333-342. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1407276. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
2
Communicating about chemicals in cigarette smoke: impact on knowledge and misunderstanding.关于香烟烟雾中化学物质的沟通:对知识和误解的影响。
Tob Control. 2020 Sep;29(5):556-563. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054863. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
3
Public Understanding of Cigarette Smoke Chemicals: Longitudinal Study of US Adults and Adolescents.公众对香烟烟雾化学物质的认知:美国成年人和青少年的纵向研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):747-755. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz035.
4
Effective Formats for Communicating Risks from Cigarette Smoke Chemicals.传达香烟烟雾化学物质风险的有效形式。
Tob Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;4(2):16-29. doi: 10.18001/TRS.4.2.2.
5
Design cues for tobacco communication: Heuristic interpretations and usability of online health information about harmful chemicals.烟草传播设计线索:关于有害化学物质的在线健康信息的启发式解释和可用性。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104177. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104177. Epub 2020 May 17.
6
Communicating about cigarette smoke constituents: an experimental comparison of two messaging strategies.关于香烟烟雾成分的沟通:两种信息传递策略的实验比较。
J Behav Med. 2017 Apr;40(2):352-359. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9795-x. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
7
"My First Thought was Croutons": Perceptions of Cigarettes and Cigarette Smoke Constituents Among Adult Smokers and Nonsmokers.“我的第一反应是油煎面包块”:成年吸烟者和非吸烟者对香烟及香烟烟雾成分的认知
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jul;18(7):1566-74. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv281. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Public understanding of cigarette smoke constituents: three US surveys.美国三项关于公众对香烟烟雾成分了解情况的调查。
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):592-599. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052897. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
9
Identifying principles for effective messages about chemicals in cigarette smoke.确定关于香烟烟雾中化学物质的有效信息的原则。
Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
10
How people think about the chemicals in cigarette smoke: a systematic review.人们如何看待香烟烟雾中的化学物质:一项系统综述。
J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;40(4):553-564. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9823-5. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating Numeric Risk Information to Patients.向患者传达数字风险信息。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09520-8.
2
Impact of warning pictorials and size on perceived effectiveness of cigar warning labels in a nationally representative between-subjects experiment.在一项具有全国代表性的组间实验中,警示图片和尺寸对雪茄警示标签感知有效性的影响。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e088482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088482.
3
Clearing the air: evaluating institutions' social media health messaging on wildfire and smoke risks in the US Pacific Northwest.净化空气:评估美国太平洋西北地区各机构在社交媒体上发布的有关野火和烟雾风险的健康信息
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17907-1.
4
Youth and adult understanding of public displays of information about harmful constituents in cigarette smoke.青少年和成年人对香烟烟雾中有害物质成分的公共信息展示的理解。
Prev Med. 2023 Apr;169:107458. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107458. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
Is a cigarette brand with fewer chemicals safer? Public perceptions in two national US experiments.是一个含化学物质较少的香烟品牌更安全吗?来自两个美国全国性实验的公众认知。
J Behav Med. 2022 Oct;45(5):812-817. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00329-y. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
6
Evidence-based recommendations for communicating the impacts of climate change on health.循证建议用于沟通气候变化对健康的影响。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 May 25;12(4):543-553. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac029.
7
Development and Application of an Interdisciplinary Rapid Message Testing Model for COVID-19 in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州新冠病毒跨学科快速信息检测模型的开发与应用
Public Health Rep. 2021 Jul-Aug;136(4):413-420. doi: 10.1177/00333549211018676. Epub 2021 May 19.
8
Design cues for tobacco communication: Heuristic interpretations and usability of online health information about harmful chemicals.烟草传播设计线索:关于有害化学物质的在线健康信息的启发式解释和可用性。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104177. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104177. Epub 2020 May 17.
9
Communicating about chemicals in cigarette smoke: impact on knowledge and misunderstanding.关于香烟烟雾中化学物质的沟通:对知识和误解的影响。
Tob Control. 2020 Sep;29(5):556-563. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054863. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
10
Do Smokers Recall Source or Quitline on Cigarette Constituent Messages?吸烟者会记得香烟成分信息的来源或戒烟热线吗?
Tob Regul Sci. 2018 Nov;4(6):66-82. doi: 10.18001/TRS.4.6.7.

本文引用的文献

1
Public understanding of cigarette smoke constituents: three US surveys.美国三项关于公众对香烟烟雾成分了解情况的调查。
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):592-599. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052897. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
2
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
3
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.评估亚马逊土耳其机器人作为实验行为研究工具。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
4
Tables or bar graphs? Presenting test results in electronic medical records.表格还是条形图?在电子病历中呈现检验结果。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):545-53. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12441395. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
5
Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk.提高乳腺癌复发风险的沟通。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):553-61. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1791-9. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
6
Usability and accessibility in consumer health informatics current trends and future challenges.消费者健康信息学中的可用性和可访问性:当前趋势和未来挑战。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5 Suppl 2):S187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.009.
7
Impact of the new Malaysian cigarette pack warnings on smokers' awareness of health risks and interest in quitting smoking.新马来西亚烟盒警示对烟民健康风险意识和戒烟意愿的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Nov;7(11):4089-99. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7114089. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
8
Current Challenge in Consumer Health Informatics: Bridging the Gap between Access to Information and Information Understanding.消费者健康信息学当前面临的挑战:弥合信息获取与信息理解之间的差距。
Biomed Inform Insights. 2009 Jan 1;2(1):1-10. doi: 10.4137/bii.s2223.
9
Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies.协调人类吸烟行为和机器吸烟模式:对理解吸烟行为和对实验室研究影响的启示。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Dec;18(12):3305-20. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1014.
10
Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions.赋予数字意义:评价类别对决策的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Sep;15(3):213-27. doi: 10.1037/a0016978.