• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定关于香烟烟雾中化学物质的有效信息的原则。

Identifying principles for effective messages about chemicals in cigarette smoke.

机构信息

School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.

School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.005
PMID:28890353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5764803/
Abstract

US law requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to disclose information on harmful and potentially harmful chemicals in cigarette smoke (i.e., constituents) to the public. To inform this effort, we sought to identify principles for creating constituent messages that effectively discourage smoking. Participants were an online convenience sample of 1148 US smokers ages 18+. We developed a library of 76 messages about constituents only and constituents plus contextualizing information (i.e., toxic products that also contain the chemical, health effects, or both). We randomized smokers to receive 1 message from each of 7 message panels in a mixed between-/within-subjects experiment. Participants rated each message on perceived message effectiveness. Results indicated that smokers perceived messages about arsenic, formaldehyde, lead, uranium, and ammonia as more effective than messages about nitrosamines. Messages that contained information on toxic products, health effects, or both received higher effectiveness ratings than constituent-only messages. Among constituent-only messages, those that referenced multiple constituents received higher effectiveness ratings than those with fewer constituents. We conclude that chemical messages may have more impact if they pair known constituents with toxic product or health effect information. These message principles can be used to inform studies examining the impact of constituent messages on smoking beliefs and behavior.

摘要

美国法律要求食品和药物管理局(FDA)向公众披露香烟烟雾中有害和潜在有害化学物质(即成分)的信息。为了支持这一工作,我们试图确定制定有效劝阻吸烟的成分信息的原则。参与者是一个由 1148 名年龄在 18 岁以上的美国吸烟者组成的在线便利样本。我们开发了一个包含 76 条关于成分和上下文信息(即含有该化学物质的有毒产品、健康影响或两者兼有)的信息库。我们在混合的被试间/被试内实验中,将吸烟者随机分配到 7 个信息面板中的每个面板接收 1 条信息。参与者对每条信息的感知信息有效性进行了评分。结果表明,吸烟者认为关于砷、甲醛、铅、铀和氨的信息比关于亚硝胺的信息更有效。包含关于有毒产品、健康影响或两者的信息的信息比仅包含成分的信息收到更高的有效性评分。在仅包含成分的信息中,那些提到多种成分的信息比那些提到较少成分的信息收到更高的有效性评分。我们得出结论,如果化学信息将已知成分与有毒产品或健康影响信息结合起来,可能会产生更大的影响。这些信息原则可以用于研究成分信息对吸烟信念和行为的影响。

相似文献

1
Identifying principles for effective messages about chemicals in cigarette smoke.确定关于香烟烟雾中化学物质的有效信息的原则。
Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
2
Effective Message Elements for Disclosures About Chemicals in Cigarette Smoke.关于香烟烟雾中化学物质披露的有效信息要素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Aug 14;20(9):1047-1054. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx109.
3
Effect of Cigarette Constituent Messages With Engagement Text on Intention to Quit Smoking Among Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.香烟成分信息与参与式文本对有吸烟习惯的成年人戒烟意愿的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210045. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0045.
4
An Eye Tracking Study of Anti-Smoking Messages on Toxic Chemicals in Cigarettes.一项关于香烟中有毒化学物质反吸烟信息的眼动追踪研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 12;16(22):4435. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224435.
5
Cigarette Constituent Health Communications for Smokers: Impact of Chemical, Imagery, and Source.香烟成分对吸烟者的健康影响:化学物质、图像和来源的作用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 May 21;21(6):841-845. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx226.
6
Public understanding of cigarette smoke constituents: three US surveys.美国三项关于公众对香烟烟雾成分了解情况的调查。
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):592-599. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052897. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
7
Public Understanding of Cigarette Smoke Chemicals: Longitudinal Study of US Adults and Adolescents.公众对香烟烟雾化学物质的认知:美国成年人和青少年的纵向研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):747-755. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz035.
8
Communicating about cigarette smoke constituents: an experimental comparison of two messaging strategies.关于香烟烟雾成分的沟通:两种信息传递策略的实验比较。
J Behav Med. 2017 Apr;40(2):352-359. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9795-x. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
9
Brand switching and toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke: A national study.香烟烟雾中的品牌转换与有毒化学物质:一项全国性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0189928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189928. eCollection 2018.
10
Online Information About Harmful Tobacco Constituents: A Content Analysis.关于有害烟草成分的在线信息:一项内容分析
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1209-1215. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw220.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying attributes of effective cigar warnings: a choice-based conjoint experiment in an online survey of US adults who smoke cigars.识别有效雪茄警示的属性:一项针对美国成年雪茄吸烟者的在线调查中的基于选择的联合实验。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e088525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088525.
2
Messages About Tobacco and Alcohol Co-Users.关于烟草和酒精共同使用者的信息。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025 Jan;86(1):140-148. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00415. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
How Do Behavioral Framing, Linguistic Certainty, and Target Specification Impact Responses to Vaping Prevention Messages?行为框架、语言确定性和目标说明如何影响对电子烟预防信息的反应?
J Health Commun. 2024 Jul 2;29(7):420-431. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2024.2355299. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
Identifying promising themes and messages for youth vaping prevention: A national study.确定有前途的青年吸电子烟预防主题和信息:一项全国性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 May;348:116864. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116864. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
Youth and adult understanding of public displays of information about harmful constituents in cigarette smoke.青少年和成年人对香烟烟雾中有害物质成分的公共信息展示的理解。
Prev Med. 2023 Apr;169:107458. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107458. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
6
Cannabis use among adolescents and emerging adults who use e-cigarettes: Findings from an online, national U.S. Sample.青少年和电子烟使用者中的大麻使用情况:来自美国全国在线样本的发现。
Addict Behav. 2023 May;140:107620. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107620. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
7
A review of research on cigarette smoking in Preventive Medicine in recognition of the journal's 50th anniversary.预防医学领域中关于吸烟问题的研究综述,以庆祝该杂志创刊 50 周年。
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107335. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107335. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
8
Preferences, use, and perceived access to flavored e-cigarettes among United States adolescents and young adults.美国青少年和年轻人对调味电子烟的偏好、使用情况及感知可得性。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Jun;3. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100068. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Mindfulness and Mobile Health for Quitting Smoking: A Qualitative Study Among Predominantly African American Adults with Low Socioeconomic Status.正念与移动健康助力戒烟:对社会经济地位较低的非裔美国成年人的定性研究
Am J Qual Res. 2022;6(1):19-41. doi: 10.29333/ajqr/11427.
10
Awareness of and reactions to health and environmental harms of red meat among parents in the United States.美国父母对红色肉类的健康和环境危害的认识及反应。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Apr;25(4):893-903. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003098. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Strengthening Cigarette Pack Warnings on Attention and Message Processing: A Systematic Review.加强香烟包装警示对注意力和信息处理的影响:一项系统综述。
Journal Mass Commun Q. 2017 Jun 1;94(2):416-442. doi: 10.1177/1077699016674188. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
2
Effective Message Elements for Disclosures About Chemicals in Cigarette Smoke.关于香烟烟雾中化学物质披露的有效信息要素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Aug 14;20(9):1047-1054. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx109.
3
How people think about the chemicals in cigarette smoke: a systematic review.人们如何看待香烟烟雾中的化学物质:一项系统综述。
J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;40(4):553-564. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9823-5. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
4
Public understanding of cigarette smoke constituents: three US surveys.美国三项关于公众对香烟烟雾成分了解情况的调查。
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):592-599. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052897. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
5
Communicating about cigarette smoke constituents: an experimental comparison of two messaging strategies.关于香烟烟雾成分的沟通:两种信息传递策略的实验比较。
J Behav Med. 2017 Apr;40(2):352-359. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9795-x. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
Perceived Effectiveness of Antismoking Ads and Association with Quit Attempts Among Smokers: Evidence from the Tips From Former Smokers Campaign.《从“前烟民倡议”看戒烟广告的感知有效性及其与戒烟尝试的关联》
Health Commun. 2017 Aug;32(8):931-938. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1196413. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.强化香烟包装警示的影响:纵向观察性研究的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:118-129. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
Reactance to Health Warnings Scale: Development and Validation.健康警示抗拒量表:编制与验证
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):736-750. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9799-3.
9
American Spirit Pack Descriptors and Perceptions of Harm: A Crowdsourced Comparison of Modified Packs.美国精神烟包描述与危害认知:改良烟包的众包比较
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Aug;18(8):1749-56. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw097. Epub 2016 May 10.
10
"My First Thought was Croutons": Perceptions of Cigarettes and Cigarette Smoke Constituents Among Adult Smokers and Nonsmokers.“我的第一反应是油煎面包块”:成年吸烟者和非吸烟者对香烟及香烟烟雾成分的认知
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jul;18(7):1566-74. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv281. Epub 2015 Dec 17.