• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双次再处理高水平消毒方案无法清除十二指肠镜电梯内的阳性培养物。

A double-reprocessing high-level disinfection protocol does not eliminate positive cultures from the elevators of duodenoscopes.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2018 Jun;50(6):588-596. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122378. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-122378
PMID:29237202
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

Duodenoscopes have been the source of serious infection, despite correct performance of high-level disinfection (HLD). This study aimed to observe the impact of performing HLD twice on the rate of positive cultures from duodenoscope elevators.

METHODS

We performed double HLD (DHLD; i. e. complete manual cleaning followed by automated reprocessing, with the entire process repeated) and then randomly cultured the elevators of our duodenoscopes on about 30 % of occasions.

RESULTS

DHLD was associated with positive elevator cultures for any microorganism in 9.4 % of cases, with a 0.8 % rate of known pathogens (627 cultures) between May 2015 and February 2016. After February 2016, and in association with changing the precleaning fluid, as well as use of a new FDA-recommended cleaning brush, the rate of positive cultures for any microorganism after DHLD was 4.8 % and 0.2 % for known pathogens (420 cultures). In a third phase, characterized by a change in personnel performing DHLD and retirement of a duodenoscope with a high rate of positive cultures, the rate of positive cultures for any microorganism was 4.9 % (783 cultures) and the rate of positive culture for known pathogens was 0.3 %. To our knowledge, no duodenoscope transmission of infection occurred during the study interval.

CONCLUSIONS

DHLD resulted in a low rate of positive cultures for known pathogens and for organisms of low pathogenic potential, but did not eliminate these, from duodenoscope elevators. Additional improvements in HLD protocols and/or duodenoscope design are needed.

摘要

背景与研究目的

尽管已正确执行高水平消毒(HLD),但十二指肠镜仍是严重感染的源头。本研究旨在观察对十二指肠镜抬臂执行两次 HLD 对培养阳性率的影响。

方法

我们对抬臂执行了两次 HLD(即先彻底手动清洁,再进行自动化处理,整个过程重复),然后在大约 30%的情况下对抬臂进行随机培养。

结果

在 2015 年 5 月至 2016 年 2 月期间,DHLD 与任何微生物阳性抬臂培养相关,阳性率为 9.4%,已知病原体的检出率为 0.8%(627 个培养物)。2016 年 2 月之后,由于改变了预清洁液,并且使用了新的美国食品药品监督管理局推荐的清洁刷,两次 HLD 后任何微生物阳性培养的检出率为 4.8%,已知病原体的检出率为 0.2%(420 个培养物)。在第三阶段,特征为执行两次 HLD 的人员发生改变以及一台阳性培养率较高的十二指肠镜退役,任何微生物阳性培养的检出率为 4.9%(783 个培养物),已知病原体的检出率为 0.3%。据我们所知,在研究期间未发生十二指肠镜传播感染。

结论

DHLD 可降低十二指肠镜抬臂已知病原体和低致病潜能病原体的阳性培养率,但不能消除这些病原体。需要进一步改进 HLD 方案和/或十二指肠镜设计。

相似文献

1
A double-reprocessing high-level disinfection protocol does not eliminate positive cultures from the elevators of duodenoscopes.双次再处理高水平消毒方案无法清除十二指肠镜电梯内的阳性培养物。
Endoscopy. 2018 Jun;50(6):588-596. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122378. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
2
Randomized Comparison of 3 High-Level Disinfection and Sterilization Procedures for Duodenoscopes.随机比较十二指肠镜的 3 种高水平消毒和灭菌程序。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153(4):1018-1025. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.052. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Double high-level disinfection versus liquid chemical sterilization for reprocessing of duodenoscopes used for ERCP: a prospective randomized study.双高水平消毒与液体化学灭菌用于 ERCP 的十二指肠镜再处理的前瞻性随机研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Apr;93(4):927-931. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.057. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
4
Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence for bacteriologic surveillance and reprocessing strategies for minimizing risk of infection transmission by duodenoscopes.用于细菌学监测的三磷酸腺苷生物发光法以及十二指肠镜感染传播风险最小化的再处理策略。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1180-1187.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
5
A randomized trial of single versus double high-level disinfection of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes using standard automated reprocessing.一项使用标准自动化处理对单根和双根十二指肠镜和线性超声内镜行单双高水消毒的随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):306-313.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound endoscope reprocessing: Variables impacting contamination risk.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术和内镜超声内镜内镜再处理:影响污染风险的变量。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;44(9):1485-1489. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.319. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
7
Results of duodenoscope culture and quarantine after manufacturer-recommended cleaning process.十二指肠镜培养结果和制造商推荐清洗后隔离。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jun;91(6):1328-1333. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.050. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Optimizing duodenoscope reprocessing: rigorous assessment of a culture and quarantine protocol.优化十二指肠镜再处理:严格评估培养和隔离方案。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Current Practice of Duodenoscope Reprocessing.十二指肠镜再处理的当前实践。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Oct;18(10):54. doi: 10.1007/s11894-016-0528-7.
10
A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli.一种用于解决十二指肠镜相关多重耐药性大肠杆菌传播问题的隔离流程。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of single use duodenoscopes in comparison to reusable duodenoscopes for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A single center experience.一次性使用十二指肠镜与可重复使用十二指肠镜用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的疗效和安全性:单中心经验
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jun 16;17(6):105298. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.105298.
2
Current status and trends of green endoscopy.绿色内镜检查的现状与趋势
Clin Endosc. 2025 Jul;58(4):493-502. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.332. Epub 2025 May 21.
3
Microbiological surveillance result of endoscopes after INTERCEPT Foam Spray: a quasi-experimental pilot study in Singapore.
INTERCEPT泡沫喷雾处理后内窥镜的微生物监测结果:新加坡的一项准实验性初步研究。
Clin Endosc. 2024 Nov;57(6):821-831. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.030. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
4
Comparative Analysis of Antibiotic Resistance in Acute Cholangitis Patients with Stent Placement and Sphincterotomy Interventions.急性胆管炎患者支架置入与括约肌切开术干预后抗生素耐药性的比较分析
Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 13;13(11):2205. doi: 10.3390/life13112205.
5
Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues.一次性十二指肠镜:证据与未决问题。
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 5;13(8):1694. doi: 10.3390/life13081694.
6
A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research.一种用于转化研究的动态流动模型,模拟细菌污染后十二指肠镜的再处理过程。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Sep 13;2(1):e153. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.294. eCollection 2022.
7
Single-Use Duodenoscopes for ERCP: Rationale, Feasibility, Cost, and Environmental Impact.用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的一次性十二指肠镜:基本原理、可行性、成本及环境影响
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2022 May;18(5):248-291.
8
Performance and applicability of a first generation single-use duodenoscope: a single-center cohort study.第一代一次性十二指肠镜的性能与适用性:一项单中心队列研究。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul-Aug;35(4):368-375. doi: 10.20524/aog.2022.0723. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
9
Microbiology of bile aspirates obtained at ERCP in patients with suspected acute cholangitis.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)获取的疑似急性胆管炎患者胆汁抽吸物的微生物学。
Endoscopy. 2022 Nov;54(11):1045-1052. doi: 10.1055/a-1790-1314. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
10
Contamination Rates in Duodenoscopes Reprocessed Using Enhanced Surveillance and Reprocessing Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用强化监测和再处理技术对十二指肠镜进行再处理的污染率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Endosc. 2022 Jan;55(1):33-40. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.212. Epub 2022 Jan 3.