Suppr超能文献

[医学考试——在欲望与现实之间——医学执照考试第二部分(IMPP)与外科学基于专业知识的学习目标国家目录(NKLC)之间的共识分析]

[The Medical Examination - Between Desire and Reality - Analysis of Consensus Between the Second Part of the Medical Licensing Exam (IMPP) and the National Catalogue of Expertise-based Learning Goals in Surgery (NKLC)].

作者信息

Sterz Jasmina, Rüsseler Miriam, Britz Vanessa, Stefanescu Christina, Hoefer Sebastian H, Adili Farzin, Schreckenbach Teresa, Schleicher Iris, Weber Roxane, Hofmann Hans-Stefan, Voß Friedericke, König Sarah, Heinemann Markus K, Kadmon Martina

机构信息

Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Deutschland.

Klinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Deutschland.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 2017 Dec;142(6):614-621. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119995. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

Abstract

The working party of the German Society for Surgery (DGCH) on undergraduate surgical education has developed a national expertise-based catalogue of learning goals in surgery (NKLC). This study analyses the extent to which the questions of the German second medical licensing examination compiled by the IMPP are congruent with the NKLC and which thematic focus is emphasised. Firstly, a guideline and evaluation sheet were developed in order to achieve documentation of the individual examination questions of the second licensing examination with respect to the learning goals of the NKLC. In a retrospective analysis from autumn 2009 to autumn 2014, eleven licensing examinations in human medicine were screened independently by three different reviewers. In accordance with the guideline, the surgical questions were identified and subsequently matched to the learning goals of the NKLC. The analysis included the number of surgical learning goals as well as the number of surgical questions for each examination, learning goal, and different levels of expertise (LE). Thirteen reviewers from six surgical disciplines participated in the analysis. On average, reviewers agreed on the differentiation between surgical and non-surgical questions in 79.1% of all 3480 questions from 11 licensing examinations. For each examination (n = 320 questions), 98.8 ± 22.6 questions (min.: 69, max.: 150) were rated as surgical. For each surgical learning goal addressed, 2.2 ± 0.3 questions (min.: 1, max.: 16) were asked. For each examination, 23.5 ± 6.3 questions (min.: 11; max.: 31) referred to learning goals of LE 3, 52.5 ± 16.7 questions (min.: 34; max.: 94) addressed learning goals of LE 2 and 22.8 ± 7.7 questions (min.: 9; max.: 34) were related to learning goals of LE 1. 64 learning goals (27.8% of all learning goals of the NKLC) were not reflected in the examinations. With a total of 70 questions, the most frequently examined surgical topic was "disorders of the rheumatic spectrum". The number of surgical examination questions in the German second medical licensing examination seems to be sufficient. However, the questions seem to be unevenly distributed between different surgical areas of undergraduate education. In order to achieve a more homogenous representation of relevant surgical topics, improved alignment is needed between the state examination with existing catalogues of learning goals by the IMPP.

摘要

德国外科学会(DGCH)本科外科教育工作小组制定了一份基于国家专业知识的外科学学习目标目录(NKLC)。本研究分析了IMPP编制的德国第二次医学执照考试的问题与NKLC的契合程度以及强调的主题重点。首先,制定了一份指南和评估表,以便根据NKLC的学习目标记录第二次执照考试的各个考试问题。在2009年秋季至2014年秋季的回顾性分析中,三位不同的评审员独立筛选了11次人类医学执照考试。按照指南,确定外科问题,随后将其与NKLC的学习目标进行匹配。分析包括每次考试、学习目标和不同专业水平(LE)的外科学学习目标数量以及外科问题数量。来自六个外科学科的13名评审员参与了分析。在11次执照考试的所有3480个问题中,评审员平均在79.1%的问题上对外科问题和非外科问题的区分达成一致。每次考试(n = 320个问题),有98.8±22.6个问题(最少:69个,最多:150个)被评为外科问题。针对每个涉及的外科学学习目标,提出了2.2±0.3个问题(最少:1个,最多:16个)。每次考试,有23.5±6.3个问题(最少:11个;最多:31个)涉及LE 3的学习目标,52.5±16.7个问题(最少:34个;最多:94个)涉及LE 2的学习目标,22.8±7.7个问题(最少:9个;最多:34个)与LE 1的学习目标相关。64个学习目标(占NKLC所有学习目标的27.8%)在考试中未得到体现。“风湿性疾病谱”以总共70个问题成为最常考查的外科主题。德国第二次医学执照考试中的外科考试问题数量似乎足够。然而,这些问题在本科教育的不同外科领域之间的分布似乎不均衡。为了更均匀地呈现相关外科主题,国家考试与IMPP现有的学习目标目录之间需要更好地保持一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验